Temporal Analysis of Transaction Ego Networks with Different Labels on Ethereum

Due to the widespread use of smart contracts, Ethereum has become the second-largest blockchain platform after Bitcoin. Many different types of Ethereum accounts (ICO, Mining, Gambling, etc.) also have quite active trading activities on Ethereum. Studying the transaction records of these specific Ethereum accounts is very important for understanding their particular transaction characteristics, and further labeling the pseudonymous accounts. However, traditional methods are generally based on static and global transaction networks to conduct research, ignoring useful information about dynamic changes. Our work chooses six kinds of important account labels, and builds ego networks for each kind of Ethereum account. We focus on the interaction between the target node and neighbor nodes with temporal analysis. Experiments show that there is a significant difference between various types of accounts in terms of several network features, helping us better understand their transaction patterns. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to analyze the dynamic characteristics of Ethereum labeled accounts from the perspective of transaction ego networks.

[1]  Yi Li,et al.  VW-DBG: A Dynamically Evolving Bitcoin Transaction Network Model , 2022, IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering.

[2]  Zibin Zheng,et al.  Evolution of Ethereum Transaction Relationships: Toward Understanding Global Driving Factors From Microscopic Patterns , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems.

[3]  Sourav Sengupta,et al.  Temporal Analysis of the Entire Ethereum Blockchain Network , 2021, WWW.

[4]  Zibin Zheng,et al.  Sequential Restorations of Complex Networks After Cascading Failures , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[5]  Zibin Zheng,et al.  Analysis of Cryptocurrency Transactions from a Network Perspective: An Overview , 2020, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[6]  Xi Zhang,et al.  Detecting Phishing Scams on Ethereum Based on Transaction Records , 2020, International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[7]  Zibin Zheng,et al.  Phishing Scam Detection on Ethereum: Towards Financial Security for Blockchain Ecosystem , 2020, IJCAI.

[8]  Anis Jarboui,et al.  How the cryptocurrency market has performed during COVID 19? A multifractal analysis , 2020, Finance Research Letters.

[9]  Zibin Zheng,et al.  Modeling and Understanding Ethereum Transaction Records via a Complex Network Approach , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs.

[10]  Zibin Zheng,et al.  Detecting Mixing Services via Mining Bitcoin Transaction Network With Hybrid Motifs , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[11]  Zibin Zheng,et al.  Who Are the Phishers? Phishing Scam Detection on Ethereum via Network Embedding , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[12]  Friedhelm Victor,et al.  Measuring Ethereum-Based ERC20 Token Networks , 2019, Financial Cryptography.

[13]  Marco Conti,et al.  Analysis of Ego Network Structure in Online Social Networks , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing.

[14]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Microscopic evolution of social networks , 2008, KDD.

[15]  Daniel Davis Wood,et al.  ETHEREUM: A SECURE DECENTRALISED GENERALISED TRANSACTION LEDGER , 2014 .

[16]  S. Nakamoto,et al.  Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System , 2008 .

[17]  Francesca Odella,et al.  Using Ego-network in surveys : methodological and empirical research issues , 2006 .