An investigation of perceived exertion via whole body exertion and direct muscle force indicators during the determination of the maximum acceptable weight of lift

The objective of this study was to identify the perceived exertion mechanisms (direct muscle force and whole body exertion) associated with the decision to change the weight of lift during the determination of the maximum acceptable weight of lift (MAWL). Fifteen males lifted a box of unknown weight at a rate of 4.3 lifts/min, and adjusted the weight until their MAWL was reached. Variables such as the predicted muscle forces and heart rate were measured during the lifting exertion, as well as the predicted spinal loading in three dimensions using an EMG-assisted biomechanical model. Multiple logistic regression techniques were used to identify variables that were associated with the decision to change the weights up and down prior to a subsequent lift. Results indicated that the force in the left erector spinae, right internal oblique, and left latissimus dorsi muscles as well as heart rate were associated with decreases in the weight prior to the next lift. It appears that a combination of local factors (muscle force) and whole body exertion factors (heart rate) provide the feedback for the perceived exertion when decreasing the weight. The up-change model indicated that the forces of the right erector spinae, left internal oblique, and the right latissimus dorsi muscles were associated with the decision to increase the weight prior to the next lift. Thus, local factors provide feedback during the decision to increase the weight when starting from light weights. Collectively, these ® ndings indicate that psychophysically determined weight limits may be more sensitive to muscular strain rather than spinal loading.

[1]  P M Mihevic,et al.  Sensory cues for perceived exertion: a review. , 1981, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  W. G. Allread,et al.  The Role of Dynamic Three-Dimensional Trunk Motion in Occupationally-Related Low Back Disorders: The Effects of Workplace Factors, Trunk Position, and Trunk Motion Characteristics on Risk of Injury , 1993, Spine.

[3]  W. Marras,et al.  An EMG-assisted model of loads on the lumbar spine during asymmetric trunk extensions. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  V Putz-Anderson,et al.  Back pain among workers in the United States: national estimates and workers at high risk. , 1995, American journal of industrial medicine.

[5]  S J Legg,et al.  Maximum acceptable repetitive lifting workloads for an 8-hour work-day using psychophysical and subjective rating methods. , 1981, Ergonomics.

[6]  D. McCloskey,et al.  Interpretation of perceived motor commands by reference to afferent signals. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  D. McCloskey.  Kinesthetic sensibility. , 1978, Physiological reviews.

[8]  G D Herrin,et al.  Prediction of overexertion injuries using biomechanical and psychophysical models. , 1986, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[9]  D B Chaffin,et al.  Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[10]  Gary A. Mirka,et al.  Accuracy of a three-dimensional lumbar motion monitor for recording dynamic trunk motion characteristics , 1992 .

[11]  D. Spengler,et al.  Back Injuries in Industry: A Retrospective Study: I. Overview and Cost Analysis , 1986, Spine.

[12]  W S Marras,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Motion Model of Loads on the Lumbar Spine: I. Model Structure , 1991, Human factors.

[13]  S. Gandevia.  The perception of motor commands or effort during muscular paralysis. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  D. Spengler,et al.  Back Injuries in Industry: A Retrospective Study: II. Injury Factors , 1986, Spine.

[15]  S. McGill.  The biomechanics of low back injury: implications on current practice in industry and the clinic. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  S. Snook.  The design of manual handling tasks. , 1978, Ergonomics.

[17]  Effect of muscle tendon vibration on the perception of force , 1985, Experimental Neurology.

[18]  D. Chaffin,et al.  A proposed standard procedure for static muscle strength testing. , 1974, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[19]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[20]  W. Marras,et al.  Spine loading during trunk lateral bending motions. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  P. Roland.  Do muscular receptors in man evoke sensations of tension and kinaesthesia? , 1975, Brain Research.

[22]  W. Marras,et al.  A Biomechanical Assessment and Model of Axial Twisting in the Thoracolumbar Spine , 1995, Spine.

[23]  R J Robertson,et al.  Central signals of perceived exertion during dynamic exercise. , 1982, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[24]  W. Marras,et al.  An EMG-assisted model of trunk loading during free-dynamic lifting. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  I. W. Hunter,et al.  Effect of fatigue on force sensation , 1983, Experimental Neurology.

[26]  W. Marras,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Motion Model of Loads on the Lumbar Spine: II. Model Validation , 1991, Human factors.

[27]  S H Snook,et al.  The effects of task duration on psychophysically-determined maximum acceptable weights and forces. , 1990, Ergonomics.

[28]  S H Snook,et al.  Further Studies of Psychophysically Determined Maximum Acceptable Weights and Forces , 1993, Human factors.

[29]  Kermit G. Davis,et al.  Is Changing Box Weight an Effective Ergonomic Control? , 1998 .

[30]  M. M. Ayoub,et al.  Fuzzy modelling of stresses in manual lifting tasks. , 1984, Ergonomics.

[31]  W S Marras,et al.  Electromyographic studies of the lumbar trunk musculature during the generation of low‐level trunk acceleration , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[32]  R. Armstrong,et al.  Mechanisms of Exercise-Induced Muscle Fibre Injury , 1991, Sports medicine.

[33]  K B Pandolf,et al.  ADVANCES IN THE STUDY AND APPLICATION OF PERCEIVED EXERTION , 1983, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[34]  K. Killian,et al.  The effect of increased ventilation on resistive load discrimination. , 1979, The American review of respiratory disease.

[35]  R. Armstrong,et al.  Mechanisms of exercise-induced delayed onset muscular soreness: a brief review. , 1984, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[36]  K P Granata,et al.  A method for measuring external spinal loads during unconstrained free-dynamic lifting. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  Avis,et al.  Signi ® cance of biomechanical and physiological variables during the determination of maximum acceptable weight of lift , 2001 .

[38]  D. McCloskey,et al.  Effects of related sensory inputs on motor performances in man studied through changes in perceived heaviness , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[39]  K B Pandolf,et al.  Influence of Local and Central Factors in Dominating Rated Perceived Exertion during Physical Work , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[40]  S H Snook,et al.  The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[41]  R. Armstrong,et al.  Initial events in exercise-induced muscular injury. , 1990, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[42]  Lina Santaguida,et al.  Measurement of the trunk musculature from T5 to L5 using MRI scans of 15 young males corrected for muscle fibre orientation. , 1993, Clinical biomechanics.