Time to contact and the control of manual prehension

Abstract In the present study, a kinematic analysis was made of unconstrained, natural prehension movements directed toward an object approaching the observer on a conveyor belt at one of three constant velocities, from one of three different directions (head-on or along the fronto-parallel plane coming either from the subject′s left or right). Subjects were required to grasp the object when it reached a target located 20 cm directly in front of the hand′s start position. The kinematic analysis revealed that both the transport and grasp components of the movement changed in response to the experimental manipulations, but did so in a manner that guaranteed that, for objects approaching from a given direction, hand closure would begin at a constant time prior to object contact (regardless of the object’s approach speed). The kinematic analysis also revealed, however, that the onset of hand closure began earlier with objects approaching from the right than from other directions – an effect which would not be predicted if time to contact was the key variable controlling the onset of hand closure. These results, then, lend only partial support to the theory that temporal coordination between the transport and grasp components of prehension is ensured through their common dependence on time to contact information.

[1]  Doreen Kimura,et al.  Nontrivial sex differences in throwing and intercepting: Relation to psychometrically-defined spatial functions , 1991 .

[2]  Reinoud J. Bootsma,et al.  Spatio-temporal organisation of natural prehension , 1992 .

[3]  R J Bootsma,et al.  Visual information about time-to-collision between two objects. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  L. Fogassi,et al.  Prehension movements directed to approaching objects: Influence of stimulus velocity on the transport and the grasp components , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  Perceptual Structures and Distributed Motor Control , 1981 .

[6]  John P. Wann,et al.  Anticipating arrival: is the tau margin a specious theory? , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Paul Milgram,et al.  A spectacle-mounted liquid-crystal tachistoscope , 1987 .

[9]  J. Kelso,et al.  The timing of articulatory gestures: evidence for relational invariants. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  F. C. Bakker,et al.  Catching balls: how to get the hand to the right place at the right time. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Control of multimovement coordination: sensorimotor mechanisms in speech motor programming. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  Accepted April,et al.  Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension , 1991 .

[13]  M. Jeannerod The timing of natural prehension movements. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[14]  P. Viviani,et al.  32 Space-Time Invariance in Learned Motor Skills , 1980 .

[15]  M A Arbib,et al.  Schemas for the temporal organization of behaviour. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[16]  M G Fischman,et al.  Skill level, vision, and proprioception in simple one-hand catching. , 1985, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  Ann F VanSant Motor Learning and Control: A Behavioral Emphasis, ed 3. Schmidt RA. Champaign, IL, Human Kinetics, 1988, cloth, 578 pp, $38.50. , 1993 .

[18]  M. A. Arbib,et al.  Models of Trajectory Formation and Temporal Interaction of Reach and Grasp. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[19]  E Brenner,et al.  Is Judging Time-to-Contact Based on ‘Tau’? , 1996, Perception.

[20]  M. Jeannerod Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects , 1981 .

[21]  V Cavallo,et al.  Visual Information and Skill Level in Time-To-Collision Estimation , 1988, Perception.

[22]  Christine L. MacKenzie,et al.  Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task , 1990 .

[23]  A. Wing,et al.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. , 1986, Journal of motor behavior.

[24]  W Schiff,et al.  Accuracy of judging time to arrival: effects of modality, trajectory, and gender. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[26]  J. Kelso,et al.  Multifunctionality and switching in the coordination dynamics of reaching and grasping , 1994 .