In vivo chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging allows early detection of a therapeutic response in glioblastoma

Significance The prognosis and management of patients with glioma is vastly different depending on whether one detects tumor progression or treatment effects. Although the gold standard in the evaluation of treatment efficacy involves MRI, the currently available imaging methods often do not suffice to make the final decision. Our study demonstrated that amide proton transfer (APT) imaging, one subset of chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging, can detect molecular signals in glioma induced by short-term chemotherapy with temozolomide. These molecular events precede morphologic changes. The APT signal did not decrease in tumors resistant to chemotherapy. APT imaging may provide a useful prognostic biomarker of treatment response or tumor progression in glioma. Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), which account for more than 50% of all gliomas, is among the deadliest of all human cancers. Given the dismal prognosis of GBM, it would be advantageous to identify early biomarkers of a response to therapy to avoid continuing ineffective treatments and to initiate other therapeutic strategies. The present in vivo longitudinal study in an orthotopic mouse model demonstrates quantitative assessment of early treatment response during short-term chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ) by amide proton transfer (APT) imaging. In a GBM line, only one course of TMZ (3 d exposure and 4 d rest) at a dose of 80 mg/kg resulted in substantial reduction in APT signal compared with untreated control animals, in which the APT signal continued to increase. Although there were no detectable differences in tumor volume, cell density, or apoptosis rate between groups, levels of Ki67 (index of cell proliferation) were substantially reduced in treated tumors. In another TMZ-resistant GBM line, the APT signal and levels of Ki67 increased despite the same course of TMZ treatment. As metabolite changes are known to occur early in the time course of chemotherapy and precede morphologic changes, these results suggest that the APT signal in glioma may be a useful functional biomarker of treatment response or degree of tumor progression. Thus, APT imaging may serve as a sensitive biomarker of early treatment response and could potentially replace invasive biopsies to provide a definitive diagnosis. This would have a major impact on the clinical management of patients with glioma.

[1]  V. L. Doyle,et al.  Metabolic profiles of human brain tumors using quantitative in vivo 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  O. Togao,et al.  Characterization of Lung Cancer by Amide Proton Transfer (APT) Imaging: An In-Vivo Study in an Orthotopic Mouse Model , 2013, PloS one.

[3]  A. Goldberg,et al.  Protein degradation and the generation of MHC class I-presented peptides. , 2002, Advances in immunology.

[4]  P. Loehrer Radiotherapy Plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma , 2006 .

[5]  L. Recht,et al.  Advances in the management of glioblastoma: the role of temozolomide and MGMT testing , 2012, Clinical pharmacology : advances and applications.

[6]  Xavier Golay,et al.  Amide proton transfer imaging of human brain tumors at 3T , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[8]  M. Mrugala,et al.  Mechanisms of Disease: temozolomide and glioblastoma—look to the future , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Oncology.

[9]  Dorothee P. Auer,et al.  Quantitative imaging biomarkers in neuro-oncology , 2009, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[10]  T. Mak,et al.  Regulation of cancer cell metabolism , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[11]  Wei Chen,et al.  Predicting treatment response of malignant gliomas to bevacizumab and irinotecan by imaging proliferation with [18F] fluorothymidine positron emission tomography: a pilot study. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  Hiroto Hatabu,et al.  MR imaging at high magnetic fields. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[13]  O. Togao,et al.  Modulation of water exchange in Eu(III) DOTA-tetraamide complexes: considerations for in vivo imaging of PARACEST agents. , 2009, Contrast media & molecular imaging.

[14]  E. Maher,et al.  The Telomerase Antagonist, Imetelstat, Efficiently Targets Glioblastoma Tumor-Initiating Cells Leading to Decreased Proliferation and Tumor Growth , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[15]  Jinyuan Zhou,et al.  Practical data acquisition method for human brain tumor amide proton transfer (APT) imaging , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Dieta Brandsma,et al.  Clinical features, mechanisms, and management of pseudoprogression in malignant gliomas. , 2008, The Lancet. Oncology.

[17]  M. Okada,et al.  Targeting JNK for therapeutic depletion of stem-like glioblastoma cells , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[18]  J. Bryant,et al.  Pathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel (NSABP) protocol B-18. , 2002, Cancer.

[19]  K. Anderson,et al.  Intracellular Protein Degradation and Its Therapeutic Implications , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[20]  Jinyuan Zhou,et al.  Amide proton transfer imaging of 9L gliosarcoma and human glioblastoma xenografts , 2008, NMR in biomedicine.

[21]  J. Bryant,et al.  Pathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy , 2002 .

[22]  R. Shah,et al.  Role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in rapid intracellular acidification induced by alkylating DNA damage , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Jinyuan Zhou,et al.  Amide proton transfer (APT) contrast for imaging of brain tumors , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  R. Deberardinis,et al.  Glucose metabolism via the pentose phosphate pathway, glycolysis and Krebs cycle in an orthotopic mouse model of human brain tumors , 2012, NMR in biomedicine.

[25]  Comparison of spin-echo MR pulse sequences for imaging of the brain. , 1997, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[26]  J. Gore,et al.  Amide proton transfer imaging of the human breast at 7T: development and reproducibility , 2013, NMR in biomedicine.

[27]  R. Mirimanoff,et al.  Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[28]  Santosh Kesari,et al.  Malignant gliomas in adults. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  Jinyuan Zhou,et al.  MR imaging of high-grade brain tumors using endogenous protein and peptide-based contrast , 2010, NeuroImage.

[30]  R. Mirimanoff,et al.  MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  Jinyuan Zhou,et al.  Using the amide proton signals of intracellular proteins and peptides to detect pH effects in MRI , 2003, Nature Medicine.

[32]  D. Born,et al.  Pseudoprogression: Relevance With Respect to Treatment of High-Grade Gliomas , 2011, Current treatment options in oncology.

[33]  Robert E Lenkinski,et al.  CEST: from basic principles to applications, challenges and opportunities. , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[34]  H. Sambrook Molecular cloning : a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY , 1989 .

[35]  Koji Yamashita,et al.  Amide proton transfer imaging of adult diffuse gliomas: correlation with histopathological grades. , 2014, Neuro-oncology.

[36]  A G Sorensen,et al.  Pseudoprogression and Pseudoresponse: Imaging Challenges in the Assessment of Posttreatment Glioma , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[37]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  R. Bjerkvig,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma multiforme , 2012, Expert review of anticancer therapy.

[39]  D. Heitjan,et al.  31P and 1H MRS of DB‐1 melanoma xenografts: lonidamine selectively decreases tumor intracellular pH and energy status and sensitizes tumors to melphalan , 2013, NMR in biomedicine.

[40]  Erik Tryggestad,et al.  Differentiation between glioma and radiation necrosis using molecular magnetic resonance imaging of endogenous proteins and peptides , 2010, Nature Medicine.

[41]  A. Sherry,et al.  Imaging the tissue distribution of glucose in livers using a PARACEST sensor , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[42]  R. Mirimanoff,et al.  Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  J. H. Price,et al.  Morphological effects of chemotherapy on ovarian carcinoma. , 2002, Journal of clinical pathology.

[44]  C. Bailly,et al.  Relation between intracellular acidification and camptothecin-induced apoptosis in leukemia cells. , 2000, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[45]  A. Seth,et al.  The ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation pathway in cancer: therapeutic implications. , 2004, European journal of cancer.

[46]  Susumu Mori,et al.  Mechanism of magnetization transfer during on‐resonance water saturation. A new approach to detect mobile proteins, peptides, and lipids , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[47]  A. Eastman,et al.  Etoposide-induced apoptosis in human HL-60 cells is associated with intracellular acidification. , 1993, Cancer research.

[48]  Peter C M van Zijl,et al.  MRI detection of glycogen in vivo by using chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging (glycoCEST) , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  H. Uramoto,et al.  Cellular pH regulators: potentially promising molecular targets for cancer chemotherapy. , 2003, Cancer treatment reviews.

[50]  Maria I. Argyropoulou,et al.  Glioma recurrence versus radiation necrosis: accuracy of current imaging modalities , 2009, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.