Towards Adaptive Information Visualization - A Study of Information Visualization Aids and the Role of User Cognitive Style

Information Visualization systems have traditionally followed a one-size-fits-all model, whereby the same visualization is shown to each user, without taking into consideration an individual user’s preferences, abilities, or context. By contrast, given the considerable cognitive effort involved in using Information Visualizations, this paper investigates the effect of an individual user’s cognitive style on Information Visualization performance. In addition, this paper studies several interactive “visualization aids” (i.e. interactive overlays that can aid in visualization comprehension), as well as the effect of cognitive style on aid choices and preferences. The results from a user study show that cognitive style plays a significant role when performing tasks with Information Visualizations in general, and that there are clear differences in terms of individual aid choices and preferences. These findings also provide motivation for the development of adaptive and personalized Information Visualization systems that could better assist users according to their individual cognitive style.

[1]  Edward E. Cureton,et al.  The upper and lower twenty-seven per cent rule , 1957 .

[2]  Maneesh Agrawala,et al.  Graphical Overlays: Using Layered Elements to Aid Chart Reading , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[3]  Cristina Conati,et al.  Inferring Visualization Task Properties, User Performance, and User Cognitive Abilities from Eye Gaze Data , 2014, ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst..

[4]  Cristina Conati,et al.  Highlighting interventions and user differences: informing adaptive information visualization support , 2014, CHI.

[5]  Cristina Conati,et al.  Towards adaptive information visualization: on the influence of user characteristics , 2012, UMAP.

[6]  Cristina Conati,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of User Characteristics and Different Layouts on an Interactive Visualization for Decision Making , 2014, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[7]  Maneesh Agrawala,et al.  Extracting references between text and charts via crowdsourcing , 2014, CHI.

[8]  Cristina Conati,et al.  An Analysis of Attention to Student - Adaptive Hints in an Educational Game , 2012, ITS.

[9]  Nikolaos M. Avouris,et al.  Do Field Dependence-Independence Differences of Game Players Affect Performance and Behaviour in Cultural Heritage Games? , 2016, CHI PLAY.

[10]  Richard Riding,et al.  The Nature and Effects of Cognitive Style , 2014 .

[11]  Marilyn Tremaine,et al.  Understanding visualization through spatial ability differences , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..

[12]  John J. Bertin,et al.  The semiology of graphics , 1983 .

[13]  Beate Grawemeyer,et al.  Evaluation of ERST - An External Representation Selection Tutor , 2006, Diagrams.

[14]  William Ribarsky,et al.  How locus of control influences compatibility with visualization style , 2011, 2011 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST).

[15]  Alan Richardson,et al.  Verbalizer-visualizer: A cognitive style dimension. , 1977 .

[16]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Influence of cognitive style on information processing and selection of yogurt labels: Insights from an eye-tracking study. , 2015, Food research international.

[17]  Balint Hegedüs.  Information Visualisation , 2022, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[18]  Marios Belk,et al.  Using Eye Gaze Data and Visual Activities to Infer Human Cognitive Styles: Method and Feasibility Studies , 2017, UMAP.

[19]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Low-level components of analytic activity in information visualization , 2005, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2005. INFOVIS 2005..

[20]  Panagiotis Germanakos,et al.  Toward an Adaptive and Personalized Web Interaction Using Human Factors , 2009 .

[21]  Brian D. Fisher,et al.  Towards the Personal Equation of Interaction: The impact of personality factors on visual analytics interface interaction , 2010, 2010 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology.

[22]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  Narrative Visualization: Telling Stories with Data , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[23]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[24]  A. Jameson.  Adaptive interfaces and agents , 2002 .

[25]  C. A. Moore,et al.  Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications , 1977 .

[26]  Wenhong Luo,et al.  User choice of interactive data visualization format: The effects of cognitive style and spatial ability , 2019, Decis. Support Syst..

[27]  Zhen Wen,et al.  Behavior-driven visualization recommendation , 2009, IUI.

[28]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Elements of graph design , 1993 .

[29]  Thomas W. Calvert,et al.  Moticons: : detection, distraction and task , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[30]  H Carter,et al.  Group Embedded-Figures Test: Psychometric Data , 1980, Perceptual and motor skills.

[31]  Colin Ware,et al.  Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .

[32]  Vibhu O. Mittal.  Visual Prompts and Graphical Design: A Framework for Exploring the Design Space of 2-D Charts and Graphs , 1997, AAAI/IAAI.

[33]  Vincent P. Wade,et al.  A comparative survey of Personalised Information Retrieval and Adaptive Hypermedia techniques , 2012, Inf. Process. Manag..