Initial assessment of the COMPASS/BeiDou-3: new-generation navigation signals

The successful launch of five new-generation experimental satellites of the China’s BeiDou Navigation Satellite System, namely BeiDou I1-S, I2-S, M1-S, M2-S, and M3-S, marks a significant step in expanding BeiDou into a navigation system with global coverage. In addition to B1I (1561.098 MHz) and B3I (1269.520 MHz) signals, the new-generation BeiDou-3 experimental satellites are also capable of transmitting several new navigation signals in space, namely B1C at 1575.42 MHz, B2a at 1176.45 MHz, and B2b at 1207.14 MHz. For the first time, we present an initial characterization and performance assessment for these new-generation BeiDou-3 satellites and their signals. The L1/L2/L5 signals from GPS Block IIF satellites, E1/E5a/E5b signals from Galileo satellites, and B1I/B2I/B3I signals from BeiDou-2 satellites are also evaluated for comparison. The characteristics of the B1C, B1I, B2a, B2b, and B3I signals are evaluated in terms of observed carrier-to-noise density ratio, pseudorange multipath and noise, triple-frequency carrier-phase ionosphere-free and geometry-free combination, and double-differenced carrier-phase and code residuals. The results demonstrate that the observational quality of the new-generation BeiDou-3 signals is comparable to that of GPS L1/L2/L5 and Galileo E1/E5a/E5b signals. However, the analysis of code multipath shows that the elevation-dependent code biases, which have been previously identified to exist in the code observations of the BeiDou-2 satellites, seem to be not obvious for all the available signals of the new-generation BeiDou-3 satellites. This will significantly benefit precise applications that resolve wide-lane ambiguity based on Hatch–Melbourne–Wübbena linear combinations and other applications such as single-frequency precise point positioning (PPP) based on the ionosphere-free code–carrier combinations. Furthermore, with regard to the triple-frequency carrier-phase ionosphere-free and geometry-free combination, it is found that different from the BeiDou-2 and GPS Block IIF satellites, no apparent bias variations could be observed in all the new-generation BeiDou-3 experimental satellites, which shows a good consistency of the new-generation BeiDou-3 signals. The absence of such triple-frequency biases simplifies the potential processing of multi-frequency PPP using observations from the new-generation BeiDou-3 satellites. Finally, the precise relative positioning results indicate that the additional observations from the new-generation BeiDou-3 satellites can improve ambiguity resolution performance with respect to BeiDou-2 only positioning, which indicates that observations from the new-generation BeiDou-3 satellites can contribute to precise relative positioning.

[1]  Jinling Wang,et al.  Modeling and assessment of triple-frequency BDS precise point positioning , 2016, Journal of Geodesy.

[2]  O. Montenbruck,et al.  Characterization of Compass M-1 signals , 2011, GPS Solutions.

[3]  Sandra Verhagen,et al.  The GNSS ambiguity ratio-test revisited: a better way of using it , 2009 .

[4]  Harald Schuh,et al.  Precise positioning with current multi-constellation Global Navigation Satellite Systems: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and BeiDou , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Yuanxi Yang,et al.  Contribution of the Compass satellite navigation system to global PNT users , 2011 .

[6]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Initial assessment of the COMPASS/BeiDou-2 regional navigation satellite system , 2013, GPS Solutions.

[7]  Xiaohong Zhang,et al.  Characteristics of systematic errors in the BDS Hatch–Melbourne–Wübbena combination and its influence on wide-lane ambiguity resolution , 2016, GPS Solutions.

[8]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Apparent clock variations of the Block IIF-1 (SVN62) GPS satellite , 2012, GPS Solutions.

[9]  Xin Li,et al.  Mitigating BeiDou Satellite-Induced Code Bias: Taking into Account the Stochastic Model of Corrections , 2016, Sensors.

[10]  Maorong Ge,et al.  A method for improving uncalibrated phase delay estimation and ambiguity-fixing in real-time precise point positioning , 2013, Journal of Geodesy.

[11]  Qile Zhao,et al.  Multipath analysis of code measurements for BeiDou geostationary satellites , 2014, GPS Solutions.

[12]  Bofeng Li,et al.  Stochastic modeling of triple-frequency BeiDou signals: estimation, assessment and impact analysis , 2016, Journal of Geodesy.

[13]  Jinling Wang,et al.  Stochastic Modeling for Static GPS Baseline Data Processing , 1998 .

[14]  Zhigang Hu,et al.  Precise relative positioning using real tracking data from COMPASS GEO and IGSO satellites , 2012, GPS Solutions.

[15]  Wu Bin,et al.  Estimation of the inter-frequency clock bias for the satellites of PRN25 and PRN01 , 2012 .

[16]  Xingxing Li,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of multi-GNSS real-time precise positioning: GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, and Galileo , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[17]  Vazquez Becerra,et al.  Analysis of Stochastic Properties of GPS Observables , 2008 .

[18]  Guangfu Sun,et al.  Modernization milestone: BeiDou M2-S initial signal analysis , 2015, GPS Solutions.

[19]  Yuanxi Yang,et al.  Performance assessment of single- and dual-frequency BeiDou/GPS single-epoch kinematic positioning , 2014, GPS Solutions.

[20]  Xin Li,et al.  Analysis and Correction of the Inter-frequency Clock Bias for BeiDou Satellites , 2016 .

[21]  Yunbin Yuan,et al.  Initial Results of the Precise Orbit Determination for the New-Generation BeiDou Satellites (BeiDou-3) Based on the iGMAS Network , 2016, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[22]  A. Amiri-Simkooei,et al.  Assessing receiver noise using GPS short baseline time series , 2006 .

[23]  Robert Odolinski,et al.  First combined COMPASS/BeiDou-2 and GPS positioning results in Australia. Part II: Single- and multiple-frequency single-baseline RTK positioning , 2014 .

[24]  Haibo He,et al.  Preliminary assessment of the navigation and positioning performance of BeiDou regional navigation satellite system , 2013, Science China Earth Sciences.

[25]  Haojun Li,et al.  Fast estimation and analysis of the inter-frequency clock bias for Block IIF satellites , 2013, GPS Solutions.

[26]  Charles M. Meertens,et al.  TEQC: The Multi-Purpose Toolkit for GPS/GLONASS Data , 1999, GPS Solutions.

[27]  Lin Pan,et al.  A comparative analysis of measurement noise and multipath for four constellations: GPS, BeiDou, GLONASS and Galileo , 2016 .

[28]  Maorong Ge,et al.  The GFZ real-time GNSS precise positioning service system and its adaption for COMPASS , 2013 .

[29]  J. Douša,et al.  G-Nut/Anubis: Open-Source Tool for Multi-GNSS Data Monitoring with a Multipath Detection for New Signals, Frequencies and Constellations , 2015 .

[30]  O. Montenbruck,et al.  Getting a Grip on Multi-GNSS: The International GNSS Service MGEX Campaign , 2013 .

[31]  Xiaohong Zhang,et al.  Performance analysis of triple-frequency ambiguity resolution with BeiDou observations , 2016, GPS Solutions.

[32]  P. Teunissen,et al.  The ratio test for future GNSS ambiguity resolution , 2013, GPS Solutions.

[33]  Xin Li,et al.  An improved method for eliminating BeiDou satellite induced code bias , 2016 .

[34]  S. Jazaeri,et al.  Role of stochastic model on GPS integer ambiguity resolution success rate , 2015, GPS Solutions.

[35]  Lambert Wanninger,et al.  BeiDou satellite-induced code pseudorange variations: diagnosis and therapy , 2015, GPS Solutions.

[36]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Signal, orbit and attitude analysis of Japan’s first QZSS satellite Michibiki , 2011, GPS Solutions.