Comparison of support vector machine-based processing chains for hyperspectral image classification

Many different approaches have been proposed in recent years for remotely sensed hyperspectral image classification. Despite the variety of techniques designed to tackle the aforementioned problem, the definition of standardized processing chains for hyperspectral image classification is a difficult objective, which may ultimately depend on the application being addressed. Generally speaking, a hyperspectral image classification chain may be defined from two perspectives: 1) the provider's viewpoint, and 2) the user's viewpoint, where the first part of the chain comprises activities such as data calibration and geo-correction aspects, while the second part of the chain comprises information extraction processes from the collected data. The modules in the second part of the chain (which constitutes our main focus in this paper) should be ideally flexible enough to be accommodated not only to different application scenarios, but also to different hyperspectral imaging instruments with varying characteristics, and spatial and spectral resolutions. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of different processing chains resulting from combinations of modules for dimensionality reduction, feature extraction/ selection, image classification, and spatial post-processing. The support vector machine (SVM) classifier is adopted as a baseline due to its ability to classify hyperspectral data sets using limited training samples. A specific classification scenario is investigated, using a reference hyperspectral data set collected by NASA's Airborne Visible Infra-Red Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) over the Indian Pines region in Indiana, USA.

[1]  Shunlin Liang,et al.  Earth system science related imaging spectroscopy — an assessment , 2009 .

[2]  M.,et al.  Statistical and Structural Approaches to Texture , 2022 .

[3]  Johannes R. Sveinsson,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral data from urban areas based on extended morphological profiles , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  Hyperspectral Subspace Identification , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Pierre Soille,et al.  Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications , 2003 .

[6]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Fully constrained least squares linear spectral mixture analysis method for material quantification in hyperspectral imagery , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[7]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Toward intelligent training of supervised image classifications: directing training data acquisition for SVM classification , 2004 .

[8]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Recent Advances in Techniques for Hyperspectral Image Processing , 2009 .

[9]  David A. Landgrebe,et al.  Signal Theory Methods in Multispectral Remote Sensing , 2003 .

[10]  Paolo Gamba,et al.  Increased accuracy multiband urban classification using a neuro-fuzzy classifier , 2003 .

[11]  John A. Richards,et al.  Analysis of remotely sensed data: the formative decades and the future , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Estimation of number of spectrally distinct signal sources in hyperspectral imagery , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Chein-I. Chang Hyperspectral Imaging: Techniques for Spectral Detection and Classification , 2003 .

[14]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Kernel-based methods for hyperspectral image classification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  A quantitative and comparative analysis of endmember extraction algorithms from hyperspectral data , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  A Novel Transductive SVM for Semisupervised Classification of Remote-Sensing Images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[17]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Exploiting spectral and spatial information in hyperspectral urban data with high resolution , 2004, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[18]  Paul E. Johnson,et al.  Spectral mixture modeling: A new analysis of rock and soil types at the Viking Lander 1 Site , 1986 .

[19]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Parallel Implementations of SVM for Earth Observation , 2009, Parallel Programming, Models and Applications in Grid and P2P Systems.

[20]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Spectral–Spatial Classification of Hyperspectral Imagery Based on Partitional Clustering Techniques , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[21]  Charles L. Lawson,et al.  Solving least squares problems , 1976, Classics in applied mathematics.