The impacts of lean production on working conditions: A case study of a harvester assembly line in Brazil

Abstract Although the ambiguity of the impacts of lean production (LP) on working conditions is well-known, few in-depth empirical data are available concerning LP applications in contexts other than automobile plants located in developed countries. This study presents an assessment of the impacts of LP on working conditions in a harvester assembly line of an American-owned plant in Brazil. Data collection involved four main stages: (a) a qualitative assessment of the extent to which 11 LP enablers were adopted in the assembly line, based on 15 interviews with managers and supervisors; (b) interviews with six safety specialists, one safety engineer and three groups of 10 workers, in order to detect their views on both the negative and positive impacts of LP; (c) the application of two types of questionnaire to be answered by all assembly line workers – one of them aimed at assessing their views on the current working conditions and the other aimed at assessing their views on the differences between the old Taylorist–Fordist system and the new lean system; (d) a feedback meeting to discuss the results of the questionnaires with the workers. As a framework for analysis, the data collected were grouped into four constructs: work content; work organization; continuous improvement; and, health and safety. The results indicated that workers considered their working conditions were fairly good and had improved after the introduction of LP. To some extent, this positive view was due to the fact that there were many gaps between standardized work and real work. This meant that workers did not follow the assembly standards strictly and had substantial degrees of freedom. Relevance to industry This paper presents guidelines for assessing lean production (LP) impacts on working conditions either at a plant or departmental level, which were tested on a harvester assembly line in Brazil. The impacts detected in that line may provide insights for other companies concerned with balancing lean and good working conditions. Since the method adopted for assessing the impacts is fairly simple, it is a workable alternative for companies interested in surveying how LP is affecting their workforce.

[1]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[2]  P. Jackson,et al.  Lean production teams and health in garment manufacture. , 2000, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[3]  Shigeo Shingo,et al.  Zero Quality Control: Source Inspection and the Poka-Yoke System , 1986 .

[4]  J. Klein,et al.  The human costs of manufacturing reform , 1989 .

[5]  Greg J. Bamber,et al.  Factors Predicting Employees' Approval of Lean Production , 1995 .

[6]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  The Toyota way : 14 management principles from the world's greatest manufacturer , 2004 .

[7]  E. Molleman,et al.  Work Design Issues in Lean Production from a Sociotechnical Systems Perspective: Neo-Taylorism or the Next Step in Sociotechnical Design? , 1998 .

[8]  C. Cooper,et al.  Effects of just-in-time/lean production practices on worker job stress , 2004 .

[9]  Paul Stewart,et al.  Quality of working life in the automobile industry: A Canada‐UK comparative study , 2001 .

[10]  Paul R. Jackson,et al.  Impact of just-in-time on job content, employee attitudes and well-being : a longitudinal study , 1996 .

[11]  Ben Dankbaar,et al.  Lean Production: Denial, Confirmation or Extension of Sociotechnical Systems Design? , 1997 .

[12]  Tarcisio Abreu Saurin,et al.  Diretrizes para avaliação dos impactos da produção enxuta sobre as condições de trabalho , 2008 .

[13]  S. Spear,et al.  Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System , 1999 .

[14]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  The effects of lean production on worker job stress , 2006 .

[15]  J. Benders,et al.  Lean Production Assessed by Karasek’s Job Demand–Job Control Model , 2004 .

[16]  Christian Berggren Alternatives to Lean Production: Work Organization in the Swedish Auto Industry , 1993 .

[17]  Andy Neely,et al.  Operations strategy and performance , 1995 .

[18]  P. Landsbergis,et al.  The impact of lean production and related new systems of work organization on worker health. , 1999, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[19]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[20]  Lia Buarque de Macedo Guimarães,et al.  An algorithm for classifying error types of front-line workers based on the SRK framework , 2008 .

[21]  Leon Grunberg,et al.  Is Lean Mean? , 2002 .

[22]  Pentti Seppälä,et al.  How do employees perceive their organization and job when companies adopt principles of lean production , 2004 .

[23]  Nick Oliver,et al.  Shopfloor Responsibilities Under Lean Teamworking , 2000 .

[24]  M. Quinlan,et al.  Systematic occupational health and safety management : perspectives on an international development , 2000 .

[25]  Pentti Seppälä,et al.  How do employees perceive their organization and job when companies adopt principles of lean production? , 2004 .

[26]  T. Armstrong,et al.  Occupational factors and carpal tunnel syndrome. , 1987, American journal of industrial medicine.