论文信息 - A Note on Distributions of True versus Fabricated Data

A Note on Distributions of True versus Fabricated Data

New empirical evidence and statistical derivations of Benford's Law have led to successful goodness-of-fit tests to detect fraud in accounting data. Several recent case studies support the hypothesis that fabricated data do not conform to expected true digital frequencies.

Theodore P. Hill | T. Hill

[1] T. Hill. The Significant-Digit Phenomenon , 1995 .

[2] P BAKAN,et al. Response-tendencies in attempts to generate random binary series. , 1960, The American journal of psychology.

[3] R. A. Raimi,et al. The Peculiar Distribution of First Digits , 1969 .

[4] A. Neuringer. Can people behave "randomly?": The role of feedback. , 1986 .

[5] M. Ashcraft. Cognitive arithmetic: A review of data and theory , 1992, Cognition.

[6] Theodore P. Hill,et al. Random-Number Guessing and the First Digit Phenomenon , 1988 .

[7] S. Dehaene,et al. Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words , 1992, Cognition.

[8] Simon Newcomb,et al. Note on the Frequency of Use of the Different Digits in Natural Numbers , 1881 .

[9] Theodore P. Hill,et al. Base-Invariance Implies Benford's Law , 1995 .

[10] T. Hill. A Statistical Derivation of the Significant-Digit Law , 1995 .