Choice of the Group Increases Intra-Cooperation

This research investigates how variation in sociality, or the degree to which one feels belonging to a group, affects the propensity for participation in collective action. By bringing together rich models of social behavior from social psychology with decision modeling techniques from economics, these mechanisms can ultimately foster cooperation in human societies. While variation in the level of sociality surely exists across groups, little is known about whether and how it changes behavior in the context of various economic games. Specifically, we found some socialization task makes minimal group members behavior resemble that of an established group. Consistent with social identity theory, we discovered that inducing this type of minimal sociality among participants who were previously unfamiliar with each other increased social identity, and sustained cooperation rates in the newly formed groups to the point that they were comparable to those in the already established groups. Our results demonstrate that there are relatively simple ways for individuals in a group to agree about appropriate social behavior, delineate new shared norms and identities.

[1]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[2]  Linnda R. Caporael,et al.  Groups as the Mind's Natural Environment , 1997 .

[3]  Holly Arrow,et al.  Social poker: a paradigm for studying the formation of self-organized groups , 1999 .

[4]  David Huffman,et al.  The Impact of Social Ties on Group Interactions: Evidence from Minimal Groups and Randomly Assigned Real Groups , 2012 .

[5]  M. Myagkov,et al.  The value of sociality , 2014 .

[6]  John M. Levine,et al.  Creating the Ideal Group: Composition Effects at Work , 2018, Understanding Group Behavior.

[7]  S. Meier,et al.  The Impact of Group Membership on Cooperation and Norm Enforcement: Evidence Using Random Assignment to Real Social Groups , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[8]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Intentional social action in virtual communities , 2002 .

[9]  Elliot T. Berkman,et al.  Sociality as a Natural Mechanism of Public Goods Provision , 2015, PloS one.

[10]  F. Atelsek,et al.  Firo: A Three-Dimensional Theory of Interpersonal Behavior , 1959 .

[11]  E. Aronson,et al.  The social animal. , 1996 .

[12]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[13]  Jennifer L. Berdahl,et al.  The Study of Groups: Past, Present, and Future , 2000 .

[14]  M. Nowak,et al.  Cooperate without looking: Why we care what people think and not just what they do , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  M. Hogg,et al.  Interpersonal attraction, social identification and psychological group formation , 1985 .

[16]  H. Tajfel Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. , 1978 .

[17]  D. Mcclelland How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. , 1985 .

[18]  P. Pye-Smith The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.

[19]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  J. Bowlby Attachment and loss: retrospect and prospect. , 1969, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.