Statistical principles for ecological status classification of Water Framework Directive monitoring data.

Bias, precision and confidence of the classification framework are crucial elements for decisions to invest large sums to improve the ecological quality. In this study, the statistical principles for classification in relation to WFD are outlined and exemplified. Indicator adjustment to seasonal variation and other significant covariates reduces bias and improves precision. Precision is generally improved using annual means with seasonal adjustment instead of seasonal means. For classification I argue that the balance between costs of monitoring and reduction measures is only fully maintained by the fail-safe approach. The required monitoring efforts to ensure a precise classification are substantially higher than envisaged in WFD, for nutrients and phytoplankton measurements as high as 500 observations to characterise a water body. It must be ensured that sufficient monitoring data become available for classification, while indicator bias and precision is improved through modelling and further development of measurement techniques.

[1]  H. Utermöhl Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplankton-Methodik , 1958 .

[2]  D. Conley,et al.  Characteristics of Danish estuaries , 2000 .

[3]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[4]  Mark Huxham,et al.  The European Water Framework Directive: a new era in the management of aquatic ecosystem health? , 1998 .

[5]  J. Carstensen,et al.  Frequency, composition, and causes of summer phytoplankton blooms in a shallow coastal ecosystem, the Kattegat , 2004 .

[6]  Jacob Carstensen,et al.  LONG-TERM CHANGES AND IMPACTS OF HYPOXIA IN DANISH COASTAL WATERS , 2007 .

[7]  K. Staver,et al.  Water quality associated with survival of submersed aquatic vegetation along an estuarine gradient , 1993 .

[8]  J. Carstensen,et al.  Eutrophication in Europe's coastal waters , 2001 .

[9]  W van de Bund,et al.  Towards good ecological status of surface waters in Europe--interpretation and harmonisation of the concept. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[10]  Jacob Carstensen,et al.  Coastal eutrophication and trend reversal: A Danish case study , 2006 .

[11]  W. Boynton,et al.  The fate of nitrogen and phosphorus at the land-sea margin of the North Atlantic Ocean , 1996 .

[12]  James D. Hagy,et al.  Hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay, 1950–2001: Long-term change in relation to nutrient loading and river flow , 2004 .

[13]  Dennis P. Swaney,et al.  Regional nitrogen budgets and riverine N & P fluxes for the drainages to the North Atlantic Ocean: Natural and human influences , 1996 .

[14]  C. Duarte Seagrass depth limits , 1991 .

[15]  M. Pace,et al.  Human influence on river nitrogen , 1991, Nature.

[16]  R. E. Turner,et al.  Changes in Mississippi River Water Quality this CenturyImplications for coastal food webs , 1991 .

[17]  Hans W. Paerl,et al.  Coastal eutrophication and harmful algal blooms: Importance of atmospheric deposition and groundwater as “new” nitrogen and other nutrient sources , 1997 .

[18]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  The determination of ecological status in shallow lakes - a tested system (ECOFRAME) for implementation of the European Water Framework Directive , 2003 .

[19]  D. R. Fox,et al.  Environmental power analysis – a new perspective , 2001 .

[20]  Other,et al.  Environment of the Baltic Sea area: 1994-1998 , 2002 .

[21]  Bernadette Govaerts,et al.  From monitoring data to regional distributions: a practical methodology applied to water risk assessment , 2005 .

[22]  P. Verdonschot,et al.  Establishing reference conditions for European streams , 2004, Hydrobiologia.