A co-benefit and tradeoff evaluation framework for connected and automated vehicle applications

A large number of Connected and Automated Vehicle (CAV) applications have been emerging that benefit transportation systems in terms of safety, mobility and the environment. These benefits can be quantified by a variety of performance indices (PIs) as described in recent literature. However, there has been very little research in analyzing the potential co-benefits and tradeoffs among all these PIs for the various CAV applications. In this paper, we examine a number of CAV applications whose system effectiveness focus is targeted on the three key areas of safety, mobility and environment, and then examine whether some PIs are synergistic or antagonistic. Using the Lane Speed Monitoring application as a specific example, we explore the in-depth relationship between different types of measures of effectiveness (MOEs) under different penetration rates of the technology, in order to show the association between the application focus and tradeoffs to be made among different performance measures. As part of the analysis, several future research directions are discussed, including the identification of key influential factors on system performance to obtain co-benefits in terms of different types of MOEs.

[1]  Hani Ramezani,et al.  Optimized Speed Harmonization with Connected Vehicles for Work Zones , 2015, 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[2]  Flavien Balbo,et al.  Generic model for resource allocation in transportation. Application to urban parking management , 2016 .

[3]  Jim Barbaresso,et al.  USDOT’s Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) ITS strategic plan, 2015-2019. , 2014 .

[4]  Bo Chen,et al.  A Review of the Applications of Agent Technology in Traffic and Transportation Systems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[5]  John B. Kenney,et al.  Dedicated Short-Range Communications (DSRC) Standards in the United States , 2011, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[6]  Matthew Fullerton,et al.  Simulation study on improving traffic safety and traffic flow in the vicinity of a motorway accident through vehicle-to-vehicle communication , 2010 .

[7]  Yang Li,et al.  Evaluation of Forward Collision Avoidance system using driver's hazard perception , 2016, 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[8]  Hampton C. Gabler,et al.  Safety Benefits of Forward Collision Warning, Brake Assist, and Autonomous Braking Systems in Rear-End Collisions , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[9]  Elisabeth Uhlemann,et al.  Connected-Vehicles Applications Are Emerging [Connected Vehicles] , 2016, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine.

[10]  Alexey V. Vinel,et al.  Study of the platooning fuel efficiency under ETSI ITS-G5 communications , 2016, 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[11]  Tao Chen,et al.  Intelligent Environment-Friendly Vehicles: Concept and Case Studies , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[12]  Guillaume Saint Pierre,et al.  An android based ecodriving assistance system to improve safety and efficiency of internal combustion engine passenger cars , 2015 .

[13]  Guoyuan Wu,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of V2V-based Lane Speed Monitoring application: A simulation study , 2016, 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[14]  Mashrur Chowdhury,et al.  A Review of Communication, Driver Characteristics, and Controls Aspects of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[15]  John V. Rock,et al.  Jan ? ? ? ? ? ? , 2002 .

[16]  Joan Garcia-Haro,et al.  A stochastic model for design and evaluation of chain collision avoidance applications , 2013 .

[17]  Jie Lin,et al.  Estimating Relevance for the Emergency Electronic Brake Light Application , 2012, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[18]  Gerd Wanielik,et al.  Situation Assessment for Automatic Lane-Change Maneuvers , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[19]  Jeroen Ploeg,et al.  Cooperative adaptive cruise control: An artificial potential field approach , 2016, 2016 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[20]  Shaojun Feng,et al.  An integrated solution for lane level irregular driving detection on highways , 2015 .

[21]  Bo Su,et al.  A lane change warning system based on V2V communication , 2014, ITSC.

[22]  Dilip Krishnaswamy,et al.  Smartphone based driver assistance system for coordinated lane change , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE).

[23]  Jonathan Brembeck,et al.  Experimental investigation of online path planning for electric vehicles , 2016, 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[24]  Matthew J. Barth,et al.  Eco-Routing Navigation System Based on Multisource Historical and Real-Time Traffic Information , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.