ALLOZYME FREQUENCIES IN A LINEAR SERIES OF SONG DIALECT POPULATIONS

Evaluating the biological consequences of avian song dialects is important in at least two ways. First, where appropriate experimental evidence is available, we know that dialect markers in song are learned (Marler, 1970; Marler and Mundinger, 1971). Dialect systems thus offer an opportunity to determine if and how culturally transmitted vocal signals, a fundamental feature of many songbird societies, influence patterns of gene flow. Second, despite much fine descriptive work, few attempts have been made to connect the field of behavioral research on song dialects to that of evolutionary genetics. The central issue is whether or not population specific vocal signals (dialects) cause mating to take place primarily among members of the same dialect population. This question does not specify any particular behavioral mechanism that might be hypothesized nor should it suggest that gene migration is an all-or-none phenomenon. Gene flow between adjacent dialects may vary in amount or direction depending upon such possible influences as dialect discrimination affecting mate selection, recency of contact of the populations (Remington, 1968), availability of unoccupied breeding habitat, or major environmental disturbances. If song dialects reduce gene migration among dialect populations, however, then it is reasonable to predict that neighboring dialect populations may exhibit genetic differences (Templeton, 1980a). The divergence may occur because of founder effect, genetic drift, or because of selective differences in occupied habitats as when, for example, dialects occur along an environmental gradient (Endler, 1977). differential coadaptation of genomes may also be involved. Possible outcomes of the interaction of gene flow, environmental gradients, magnitude of selection pressures, and population size have only recently begun to yield to theoretical analysis (Endler, 1977; Slatkin, 1978; Lande, 1980) and we hope that our studies may be of some use in this regard. Our field data, while not constituting a test of this developing theory, may serve to underscore the significance of gene flow in population differentiation. The four song dialect populations of Whitecrowned Sparrows treated here extend over a total of only 35 km distance in an environment of apparent homogeneity in climate and vegetation. In view of the potentially high vagility of these birds, the possible consequences of discontinuities in gene flow caused by social structure may be more easily discovered. In this report we provide allozyme frequency data from four dialect populations occurring in a linear sequence along the central California coast. From these data we describe the nature and extent of genetic differentiation within and among the four song dialect populations to test the hypothesis of genetic differentiation of dialects.

[1]  M. C. Baker Effective population size in a songbird: some possible implications , 1981, Heredity.

[2]  R. Lande,et al.  Genetic Variation and Phenotypic Evolution During Allopatric Speciation , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[3]  C. Aquadro,et al.  Evolutionary genetics of birdsComparative molecular evolution in New World warblers and rodents , 1980 .

[4]  A. Templeton MODES OF SPECIATION AND INFERENCES BASED ON GENETIC DISTANCES , 1980, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  A. Templeton,et al.  The theory of speciation via the founder principle. , 1980, Genetics.

[6]  A. Templeton The Unit of Selection in DROSOPHILA MERCATORUM. II. Genetic Revolution and the Origin of Coadapted Genomes in Parthenogenetic Strains. , 1979, Genetics.

[7]  R. K. Koehn,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF GENETIC STRUCTURE IN THE MONARCH BUTTERFLY, DANAUS PLEXIPPUS L. , 1978, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  J. Powell THE FOUNDER‐FLUSH SPECIATION THEORY: AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH , 1978, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  M Slatkin,et al.  Spatial patterns in the distributions of polygenic characters. , 1978, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  C. Perrins,et al.  Inbreeding and dispersal in the great tit , 1978, Nature.

[11]  J. Endler Geographic variation, speciation, and clines. , 1977, Monographs in population biology.

[12]  R. Spielman,et al.  Inbreeding estimation from population data: models, procedures and implications. , 1977, Genetics.

[13]  C. Krimbas,et al.  Testing the heterogeneity of F values: a suggestion and a correction. , 1976, Genetics.

[14]  A. Robertson Gene frequency distributions as a test of selective neutrality. , 1975, Genetics.

[15]  R. Lewontin,et al.  Testing the Heterogeneity of F Values , 1975 .

[16]  M. C. Baker SONG DIALECTS AND GENETIC DIFFERENCES IN WHITE‐CROWNED SPARROWS (ZONOTRICHIA LEUCOPHRYS) , 1975, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  H. Carson The Genetics of Speciation at the Diploid Level , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[18]  R. Spielman Differences among Yanomama Indian villages: do the patterns of allele frequencies, anthropometrics and map locations correspond? , 1973, American journal of physical anthropology.

[19]  R. Lewontin,et al.  Distribution of gene frequency as a test of the theory of the selective neutrality of polymorphisms. , 1973, Genetics.

[20]  R. Ward,et al.  The genetic structure of a tribal population, the Yanomama Indians. VI. Analysis by F-statistics (including a comparison with the Makiritare and Xavante). , 1972, Genetics.

[21]  Masatoshi Nei,et al.  Genetic Distance between Populations , 1972, The American Naturalist.

[22]  R. Ward,et al.  Gene frequencies and microdifferentiation among the Makiritare Indians. IV. A comparison of a genetic network with ethnohistory and migration matrices; a new index of genetic isolation. , 1970, American journal of human genetics.

[23]  P. Marler A comparative approach to vocal learning: Song development in white-crowned sparrows. , 1970 .

[24]  R. Ward,et al.  Village and tribal genetic distances among American Indians, and the possible implications for human evolution. , 1970, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  J. Crow,et al.  Measurement of inbreeding from the frequency of marriages between persons of the same surname. , 1965, Eugenics quarterly.

[26]  S. Wright THE INTERPRETATION OF POPULATION STRUCTURE BY F‐STATISTICS WITH SPECIAL REGARD TO SYSTEMS OF MATING , 1965 .

[27]  L. Baptista Song dialects and demes in sedentary populations of the white-crowned sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys nuttalli) , 1975 .

[28]  R. Selander Biochemical polymorphism and systemics in the genus Peromyscus. I. Variation in the old-field mouse (Peromyscus polionotus) , 1971 .

[29]  Peter Marler,et al.  CHAPTER 10 – VOCAL LEARNING IN BIRDS , 1971 .

[30]  J. D. Niswander,et al.  Population studies on southwestern Indian tribes. II. Local genetic differentiation in the Papago. , 1970, American journal of human genetics.

[31]  C. Remington,et al.  Suture-Zones of Hybrid Interaction Between Recently Joined Biotas , 1968 .

[32]  L. Cavalli-Sforza,et al.  ANALYSIS OF HUMAN EVOLUTION UNDER RANDOM GENETIC DRIFT. , 1964, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[33]  S WRIGHT,et al.  Genetical structure of populations. , 1950, Nature.

[34]  G. Dahlberg,et al.  Genetics of human populations. , 1948, Advances in genetics.