Sensitivity of reentrant driver localization to electrophysiological parameter variability in image-based computational models of persistent atrial fibrillation sustained by a fibrotic substrate.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, causing morbidity and mortality in millions worldwide. The atria of patients with persistent AF (PsAF) are characterized by the presence of extensive and distributed atrial fibrosis, which facilitates the formation of persistent reentrant drivers (RDs, i.e., spiral waves), which promote fibrillatory activity. Targeted catheter ablation of RD-harboring tissues has shown promise as a clinical treatment for PsAF, but the outcomes remain sub-par. Personalized computational modeling has been proposed as a means of non-invasively predicting optimal ablation targets in individual PsAF patients, but it remains unclear how RD localization dynamics are influenced by inter-patient variability in the spatial distribution of atrial fibrosis, action potential duration (APD), and conduction velocity (CV). Here, we conduct simulations in computational models of fibrotic atria derived from the clinical imaging of PsAF patients to characterize the sensitivity of RD locations to these three factors. We show that RDs consistently anchor to boundaries between fibrotic and non-fibrotic tissues, as delineated by late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, but those changes in APD/CV can enhance or attenuate the likelihood that an RD will anchor to a specific site. These findings show that the level of uncertainty present in patient-specific atrial models reconstructed without any invasive measurements (i.e., incorporating each individual's unique distribution of fibrotic tissue from medical imaging alongside an average representation of AF-remodeled electrophysiology) is sufficiently high that a personalized ablation strategy based on targeting simulation-predicted RD trajectories alone may not produce the desired result.

[1]  S. Johnston,et al.  Estimation of Total Incremental Health Care Costs in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in the United States , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[2]  Zhilin Qu,et al.  Ablating atrial fibrillation: A translational science perspective for clinicians. , 2016, Heart rhythm.

[3]  Gernot Plank,et al.  Mechanistic inquiry into the role of tissue remodeling in fibrotic lesions in human atrial fibrillation. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[4]  N. Trayanova,et al.  Patient-derived models link re-entrant driver localization in atrial fibrillation to fibrosis spatial pattern. , 2016, Cardiovascular research.

[5]  Stanley Nattel,et al.  Atrial Remodeling and Atrial Fibrillation: Mechanisms and Implications , 2008, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[6]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Image-Based Estimation of Ventricular Fiber Orientations for Personalized Modeling of Cardiac Electrophysiology , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  S. Nattel,et al.  Changes in Connexin Expression and the Atrial Fibrillation Substrate in Congestive Heart Failure , 2009, Circulation research.

[8]  Trine Krogh-Madsen,et al.  Effects of Electrical and Structural Remodeling on Atrial Fibrillation Maintenance: A Simulation Study , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  Natalia A. Trayanova,et al.  Using personalized computer models to custom-tailor ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation patients: are we there yet? , 2017, Expert review of cardiovascular therapy.

[10]  Sanjiv M. Narayan,et al.  Comparison of Detailed and Simplified Models of Human Atrial Myocytes to Recapitulate Patient Specific Properties , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  Natalia A Trayanova,et al.  Towards personalized computational modelling of the fibrotic substrate for atrial arrhythmia. , 2016, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[12]  Frank Bogun,et al.  Effects of two different catheter ablation techniques on spectral characteristics of atrial fibrillation. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  W. Rappel,et al.  Clinical Mapping Approach To Diagnose Electrical Rotors and Focal Impulse Sources for Human Atrial Fibrillation , 2012, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[14]  Vadim Zipunnikov,et al.  Magnetic resonance image intensity ratio, a normalized measure to enable interpatient comparability of left atrial fibrosis. , 2014, Heart rhythm.

[15]  Natalia A. Trayanova,et al.  Computational techniques for solving the bidomain equations in three dimensions , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  M. Courtemanche,et al.  Ionic mechanisms underlying human atrial action potential properties: insights from a mathematical model. , 1998, The American journal of physiology.

[17]  S Nattel,et al.  Promotion of atrial fibrillation by heart failure in dogs: atrial remodeling of a different sort. , 1999, Circulation.

[18]  J Jalife,et al.  Stable microreentrant sources as a mechanism of atrial fibrillation in the isolated sheep heart. , 2000, Circulation.

[19]  Joshua J. E. Blauer,et al.  Virtual Electrophysiological Study of Atrial Fibrillation in Fibrotic Remodeling , 2015, PloS one.

[20]  Ashok J. Shah,et al.  Driver Domains in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation , 2014, Circulation.

[21]  Natalia A Trayanova,et al.  Mechanisms of Human Atrial Fibrillation Initiation: Clinical and Computational Studies of Repolarization Restitution and Activation Latency , 2012, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[22]  S. Nattel Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Atrial Fibrosis in Atrial Fibrillation. , 2017, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology.

[23]  Wouter-Jan Rappel,et al.  Treatment of atrial fibrillation by the ablation of localized sources: CONFIRM (Conventional Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation With or Without Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation) trial. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  Susumu Mori,et al.  Myofiber Architecture of the Human Atria as Revealed by Submillimeter Diffusion Tensor Imaging , 2016, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[25]  Nazem Akoum,et al.  Association of atrial tissue fibrosis identified by delayed enhancement MRI and atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: the DECAAF study. , 2014, JAMA.

[26]  Stanley Nattel,et al.  The clinical profile and pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation: relationships among clinical features, epidemiology, and mechanisms. , 2014, Circulation research.

[27]  O. Alfieri,et al.  Structural remodeling in atrial fibrillation , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine.

[28]  Rémi Dubois,et al.  Modelling methodology of atrial fibrosis affects rotor dynamics and electrograms. , 2016, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[29]  Hubert Cochet,et al.  Age, Atrial Fibrillation, and Structural Heart Disease Are the Main Determinants of Left Atrial Fibrosis Detected by Delayed‐Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a General Cardiology Population , 2015, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[30]  F. Fenton,et al.  Multiple mechanisms of spiral wave breakup in a model of cardiac electrical activity. , 2002, Chaos.

[31]  M. Allessie,et al.  High-density mapping of electrically induced atrial fibrillation in humans. , 1994, Circulation.

[32]  José Jalife,et al.  2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation , 2012, Heart rhythm.

[33]  Caroline H. Roney,et al.  Novel Radiofrequency Ablation Strategies for Terminating Atrial Fibrillation in the Left Atrium: A Simulation Study , 2016, Front. Physiol..

[34]  Leora Peltz,et al.  Epicardial Mapping of Chronic Atrial Fibrillation in Patients: Preliminary Observations , 2004, Circulation.

[35]  Stanley Nattel,et al.  Early management of atrial fibrillation to prevent cardiovascular complications. , 2014, European heart journal.

[36]  Richard T. Lee,et al.  Intramyocardial Fibroblast Myocyte Communication , 2010, Circulation research.

[37]  E. Kholmovski,et al.  Comparison of Left Atrial Area Marked Ablated in Electroanatomical Maps with Scar in MRI , 2014, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[38]  N. Trayanova,et al.  Relationship Between Fibrosis Detected on Late Gadolinium-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Re-Entrant Activity Assessed With Electrocardiographic Imaging in Human Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. , 2017, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology.

[39]  G Plank,et al.  Computational tools for modeling electrical activity in cardiac tissue. , 2003, Journal of electrocardiology.

[40]  Gernot Plank,et al.  Methodology for patient-specific modeling of atrial fibrosis as a substrate for atrial fibrillation. , 2012, Journal of electrocardiology.

[41]  Sanjay Dixit,et al.  Effect of pulmonary vein isolation on the left-to-right atrial dominant frequency gradient in human atrial fibrillation. , 2006, Heart rhythm.

[42]  Natalia A Trayanova,et al.  Feasibility of using patient-specific models and the "minimum cut" algorithm to predict optimal ablation targets for left atrial flutter. , 2016, Heart rhythm.

[43]  A. Harada,et al.  Atrial activation during chronic atrial fibrillation in patients with isolated mitral valve disease. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.