Dynamic manipulation of the subharmonic scattering of phospholipid-coated microbubbles

In this paper, the influence of a dynamic variation in the ambient pressure on the subharmonic response of phospholipid-coated microbubbles was investigated. The ambient pressure in water was modulated by a 2.5 kHz acoustic wave with a peak amplitude of 15 kPa. We investigated the fundamental and subharmonic emissions at two driving frequencies: 5 and 10 MHz. The modulation of the bubble radius induced by the dynamic variation in the liquid ambient pressure subsequently causes modulations of the scattered acoustic pressure at the fundamental and subharmonic frequencies (half the fundamental frequency). As a first result, we measured that the variation in the ambient pressure of 15 kPa can modulate the subharmonic amplitude up to 10 dB as compared to the static atmospheric pressure condition. As a second result, we noticed that the relative subharmonic amplitude modulation as a function of the LF acoustic pressure was symmetrical for the 5 MHz driving frequency but asymmetric for 10 MHz. In the latter case, the subharmonic amplitude was more enhanced for an ambient overpressure than reduced for an ambient depression of the same amplitude likely due to the buckling of the lipid shell. However, the fundamental amplitude was symmetrically modulated during bubble compression and expansion. Moreover, subharmonic and fundamental amplitude modulations were found to be either in phase or out of phase with the low-frequency acoustic pressure. Numerical simulations showed that this behavior can be obtained depending on the bubbles' diameter. The highest subharmonic amplitude was measured when microbubbles were insonified at 10 MHz. This fact together with the asymmetry observed in the subharmonic modulation suggests that smaller bubbles with a buckling shell are excited at 10 MHz compared to 5 MHz. These results present new potentials for in vitro characterization of contrast agent microbubbles and possibly a new imaging modality.

[1]  L. Hoff,et al.  Oscillations of polymeric microbubbles: effect of the encapsulating shell , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  M. Arditi,et al.  Subharmonic scattering of phospholipid-shell microbubbles at low acoustic pressure amplitudes , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Nonlinear shell behavior of phospholipid-coated microbubbles. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  A. Needles,et al.  High-frequency, nonlinear flow imaging of microbubble contrast agents , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[5]  D. May,et al.  Nondestructive subharmonic imaging , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[6]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Microbubble spectroscopy of ultrasound contrast agents. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Meng-Xing Tang,et al.  Effects of nonlinear propagation in ultrasound contrast agent imaging. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  P. Rafter,et al.  Means for increasing sensitivity in non-linear ultrasound imaging systems , 1997 .

[9]  S. Callé,et al.  Dynamic acoustoelastic testing of weakly pre-loaded unconsolidated water-saturated glass beads. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  F. Forsberg,et al.  Modeling subharmonic response from contrast microbubbles as a function of ambient static pressure. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Elena Tremoli,et al.  Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness Measured by Ultrasonography in Normal Clinical Practice Correlates Well With Atherosclerosis Risk Factors , 2000, Stroke.

[12]  A. Davies,et al.  The use of contrast enhanced ultrasound in carotid arterial disease. , 2010, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[13]  S. Feinstein,et al.  Contrast ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery vasa vasorum and atherosclerotic plaque neovascularization. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Flemming Forsberg,et al.  Breast lesions: imaging with contrast-enhanced subharmonic US--initial experience. , 2007, Radiology.

[15]  P. Burns,et al.  Nonlinear imaging. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  M Arditi,et al.  Nonlinear contrast imaging with an array-based micro-ultrasound system. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  G. Renaud,et al.  Exploration of trabecular bone nonlinear elasticity using time-of-flight modulation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[18]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Subharmonic behavior of phospholipid-coated ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Guillaume Renaud,et al.  Remote dynamic acoustoelastic testing: Elastic and dissipative acoustic nonlinearities measured under hydrostatic tension and compression , 2009 .

[20]  Youbin Deng,et al.  Correlation of carotid plaque neovascularization detected by using contrast-enhanced US with clinical symptoms. , 2009, Radiology.

[21]  Steven B. Feinstein,et al.  Vasa Vasorum and Plaque Neovascularization on Contrast-Enhanced Carotid Ultrasound Imaging Correlates With Cardiovascular Disease and Past Cardiovascular Events , 2010, Stroke.

[22]  Kausik Sarkar,et al.  Excitation thresholds for subharmonic response of ultrasound contrast microbubbles. , 2010 .

[23]  A. Broillet,et al.  Gray-scale liver enhancement in VX2 tumor-bearing rabbits using BR14, a new ultrasonographic contrast agent. , 1997, Investigative radiology.

[24]  M. Versluis,et al.  Acoustic sizing of an ultrasound contrast agent. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[25]  Charles T. Lancée,et al.  Higher harmonics of vibrating gas-filled microspheres. Part one: simulations , 1994 .

[26]  Roberto Chiesa,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of intraplaque neovascularization in carotid arteries: correlation with histology and plaque echogenicity. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  A. Fox,et al.  Accuracy and prognostic consequences of ultrasonography in identifying severe carotid artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group. , 1995, Stroke.

[28]  A. Needles,et al.  High frequency nonlinear B-scan imaging of microbubble contrast agents , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[29]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Subharmonic contrast intravascular ultrasound for vasa vasorum imaging. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[30]  Gian Luigi Lenzi,et al.  Detection of Carotid Adventitial Vasa Vasorum and Plaque Vascularization With Ultrasound Cadence Contrast Pulse Sequencing Technique and Echo-Contrast Agent , 2007, Stroke.

[31]  Steven B. Feinstein,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of atherosclerotic carotid plaque neovascularization: a new surrogate marker of atherosclerosis? , 2007, Vascular medicine.

[32]  R. Y. Chiao,et al.  Subharmonic Imaging with Microbubble Contrast Agents: Initial Results , 1999, Ultrasonic imaging.

[33]  Detlef Lohse,et al.  A model for large amplitude oscillations of coated bubbles accounting for buckling and rupture , 2005 .

[34]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Characterizing the subharmonic response of phospholipid-coated microbubbles for carotid imaging. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.