The timestep constraint in solving the gravitational wave equations sourced by hydromagnetic turbulence

ABSTRACT Hydromagnetic turbulence produced during phase transitions in the early universe can be a powerful source of stochastic gravitational waves (GWs). GWs can be modelled by the linearised spatial part of the Einstein equations sourced by the Reynolds and Maxwell stresses. We have implemented two different GW solvers into the Pencil Code – a code which uses a third order timestep and sixth order finite differences. Using direct numerical integration of the GW equations, we study the appearance of a numerical degradation of the GW amplitude at the highest wavenumbers, which depends on the length of the timestep – even when the Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy condition is ten times below the stability limit. This degradation leads to a numerical error, which is found to scale with the third power of the timestep. A similar degradation is not seen in the magnetic and velocity fields. To mitigate numerical degradation effects, we alternatively use the exact solution of the GW equations under the assumption that the source is constant between subsequent timesteps. This allows us to use a much longer timestep, which cuts the computational cost by a factor of about ten.

[1]  J. Williamson Low-storage Runge-Kutta schemes , 1980 .

[2]  Chiara Caprini,et al.  Cosmological backgrounds of gravitational waves , 2018, Classical and Quantum Gravity.

[3]  R. Courant,et al.  Über die partiellen Differenzengleichungen der mathematischen Physik , 1928 .

[4]  Antoine Petiteau,et al.  Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions , 2015, 1512.06239.

[5]  L. Grishchuk,et al.  Amplification of gravitational waves in an isotropic universe , 1974 .

[6]  Alan McAlpine,et al.  Aeroacoustics of Low Mach Number Flows: Fundamentals, Analysis and Measurement S. Glegg and W. Devenport Academic Press, Elsevier, The Boulevard, Langford Lane, OX5 1GB, Kidlington, Oxford, UK. xiii; 537pp. 2017. Illustrated. £97. ISBN 978-0-12-809651-2. , 2018, The Aeronautical Journal.

[7]  Turner,et al.  Gravitational radiation from first-order phase transitions. , 1994, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[8]  Nils Erland L. Haugena,et al.  Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic energy spectra from large eddy simulations , 2006 .

[9]  M. Lighthill On sound generated aerodynamically II. Turbulence as a source of sound , 1954, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[10]  J. G. Porter THE CURVATURE OF SPACE. , 1931, Science.

[11]  R. Stein Generation of acoustic and gravity waves by turbulence in an isothermal stratified atmosphere , 1967 .

[12]  I. Proudman,et al.  The generation of noise by isotropic turbulence , 1952, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[13]  S. Nazarenko,et al.  Turbulence of Weak Gravitational Waves in the Early Universe. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[14]  N. Kleeorin,et al.  COSMIC-RAY CURRENT-DRIVEN TURBULENCE AND MEAN-FIELD DYNAMO EFFECT , 2012, 1204.4246.

[15]  A. Friedman On the Curvature of space , 1922 .

[16]  Tensor microwave anisotropies from a stochastic magnetic field , 1999, astro-ph/9911040.

[17]  R. Durrer,et al.  Scale-invariant helical magnetic field evolution and the duration of inflation , 2016, 1610.03139.

[18]  A. Bell Turbulent amplification of magnetic field and diffusive shock acceleration of cosmic rays , 2004 .

[19]  A. Friedman Über die Krümmung des Raumes , 1922 .

[20]  Large-scale magnetic fields from hydromagnetic turbulence in the very early universe. , 1996, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[21]  Primordial magnetic fields and causality , 2003, astro-ph/0305059.

[22]  A. Tevzadze,et al.  Nonhelical inverse transfer of a decaying turbulent magnetic field. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[23]  U. Frisch,et al.  Strong MHD helical turbulence and the nonlinear dynamo effect , 1976, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[24]  Bharat Ratra,et al.  Gravitational radiation from primordial helical magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[25]  V. Rubakov,et al.  POSSIBLE ANISOTROPIC PHASES IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE AND GRAVITATIONAL WAVE BACKGROUND , 1986 .

[26]  Shuichiro Yokoyama,et al.  Limits on primordial magnetic fields from direct detection experiments of gravitational wave background , 2018, Physical Review D.

[27]  F. Anselmet,et al.  High-order velocity structure functions in turbulent shear flows , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[28]  Stefano Casertano,et al.  A 3% SOLUTION: DETERMINATION OF THE HUBBLE CONSTANT WITH THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE AND WIDE FIELD CAMERA 3 , 2011, 1103.2976.

[29]  Evolution of cosmic magnetic fields: From the very early Universe, to recombination, to the present , 2004, astro-ph/0410032.

[30]  G. Sigl,et al.  Gravitational Waves produced by Compressible MHD Turbulence from Cosmological Phase Transitions , 2018, 1803.02271.

[31]  M. Maggiore Gravitational wave experiments and early universe cosmology , 1999, gr-qc/9909001.

[32]  A. Brandenburg,et al.  Inverse cascade in decaying three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[33]  Gravitational Radiation From Cosmological Turbulence , 2001, astro-ph/0111483.

[34]  K. Subramanian,et al.  Varying the forcing scale in low Prandtl number dynamos , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[35]  A. Kosowsky,et al.  Spectrum of gravitational radiation from primordial turbulence , 2007, 0705.1733.

[36]  K. Subramanian,et al.  The origin, evolution and signatures of primordial magnetic fields , 2015, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[37]  J. Snellman,et al.  Testing turbulent closure models with convection simulations , 2012, 1209.4923.

[38]  G. W. Pratt,et al.  Planck intermediate results , 2013 .

[39]  R. Courant,et al.  On the Partial Difference Equations, of Mathematical Physics , 2015 .

[40]  A. Tevzadze,et al.  Evolution of hydromagnetic turbulence from the electroweak phase transition , 2017, 1711.03804.

[41]  Niksa Peter,et al.  Gravitational waves produced by compressible MHD turbulence from cosmological phase transitions , 2018, Classical and Quantum Gravity.

[42]  A. Tevzadze,et al.  Numerical simulations of the decay of primordial magnetic turbulence , 2010, 1004.3084.

[43]  A. Brandenburg,et al.  Classes of Hydrodynamic and Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulent Decay. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[44]  Axel Brandenburg,et al.  Computational aspects of astrophysical MHD and turbulence , 2001, Advances in Nonlinear Dynamos.

[45]  She,et al.  Universal scaling laws in fully developed turbulence. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[46]  G. W. Pratt,et al.  Planck intermediate results - XXIV. Constraints on variations in fundamental constants , 2014, 1406.7482.

[47]  M. Lighthill On sound generated aerodynamically I. General theory , 1952, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[48]  Edward R. Champion Numerical Methods for Engineering Applications , 1993 .

[49]  Gregory Falkovich,et al.  Bottleneck phenomenon in developed turbulence , 1994 .

[50]  Mitsuo Yokokawa,et al.  Energy dissipation rate and energy spectrum in high resolution direct numerical simulations of turbulence in a periodic box , 2003 .

[51]  A. Kosowsky,et al.  Numerical simulations of gravitational waves from early-universe turbulence , 2019, 1903.08585.