Cell-free protein synthesis in a microchamber revealed the presence of an optimum compartment volume for high-order reactions.

The application of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) to chemistry and biochemistry allows various reactions to be performed in microscale compartments. Here, we aimed to use the glass microchamber to study the compartment size dependency of the protein synthesis, one of the most important reactions in the cell. By encapsulating the cell-free protein synthesis system with different reaction orders in femtoliter microchambers, chamber size dependency of the reaction initiated with a constant copy number of DNA was investigated. We were able to observe the properties specific to the high order reactions in microcompartments with high precision and found the presence of an optimum compartment volume for a high-order reaction using real biological molecules.

[1]  F. Scott Mathews,et al.  Structure of human β-glucuronidase reveals candidate lysosomal targeting and active-site motifs , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[2]  Pasquale Stano,et al.  Characterization of the emergent properties of a synthetic quasi-cellular system , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.

[3]  H. Craighead.  Future lab-on-a-chip technologies for interrogating individual molecules , 2006, Nature.

[4]  Yuji Murakami,et al.  A picoliter chamber array for cell-free protein synthesis. , 2004, Journal of biochemistry.

[5]  Kazufumi Hosoda,et al.  Quantitative study of the structure of multilamellar giant liposomes as a container of protein synthesis reaction. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[6]  Tetsuya Yomo,et al.  Quantifying epistatic interactions among the components constituting the protein translation system , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[7]  Russell Schwartz,et al.  Computational models of molecular self-organization in cellular environments , 2007, Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.

[8]  O Orwar,et al.  Controlling chemistry by geometry in nanoscale systems. , 2009, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[9]  George M Church,et al.  Towards synthesis of a minimal cell , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[10]  Petra Schwille,et al.  A New Embedded Process for Compartmentalized Cell‐Free Protein Expression and On‐line Detection in Microfluidic Devices , 2005, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[11]  T. Yomo,et al.  Effects of compartment size on the kinetics of intracompartmental multimeric protein synthesis. , 2012, ACS synthetic biology.

[12]  Pasquale Stano,et al.  Approaches to semi-synthetic minimal cells: a review , 2005, Naturwissenschaften.

[13]  H. Kuthan.  Self-organisation and orderly processes by individual protein complexes in the bacterial cell. , 2001, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[14]  T. Yomo,et al.  Kinetic Analysis of β-Galactosidase and β-Glucuronidase Tetramerization Coupled with Protein Translation* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  Mike Tyers,et al.  How Cells Coordinate Growth and Division , 2004, Current Biology.

[16]  David R Walt,et al.  Distinct and long-lived activity states of single enzyme molecules. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[17]  Pasquale Stano,et al.  Achievements and open questions in the self-reproduction of vesicles and synthetic minimal cells. , 2010, Chemical communications.

[18]  Andrew D Griffiths,et al.  A completely in vitro ultrahigh-throughput droplet-based microfluidic screening system for protein engineering and directed evolution. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[19]  B. Matthews,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of β-galactosidase from E. coli. , 1994, Nature.

[20]  B. Edgar,et al.  Why size matters: altering cell size. , 2002, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[21]  N. Friedman,et al.  Stochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level , 2006, Nature.

[22]  A. Abate,et al.  High-throughput injection with microfluidics using picoinjectors , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  N. Ono,et al.  Comprehensive Analysis of the Effects of Escherichia coli ORFs on Protein Translation Reaction*S , 2008, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[24]  S. Quake,et al.  Dynamic pattern formation in a vesicle-generating microfluidic device. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[25]  Hiroyuki Fujita,et al.  Highly coupled ATP synthesis by F1-ATPase single molecules , 2005, Nature.

[26]  Takuya Ueda,et al.  Cell-free translation reconstituted with purified components , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  Stephen Mann,et al.  Systems of creation: the emergence of life from nonliving matter. , 2012, Accounts of chemical research.

[28]  Seung-Yong Jung,et al.  Fast mixing and reaction initiation control of single-enzyme kinetics in confined volumes. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[29]  Helen Song,et al.  Millisecond kinetics on a microfluidic chip using nanoliters of reagents. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[30]  K. Yoshikawa,et al.  Cell-Sized confinement in microspheres accelerates the reaction of gene expression , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[31]  Michael L Simpson,et al.  Cell-free synthetic biology: a bottom-up approach to discovery by design , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[32]  B. Grzybowski,et al.  Why Cells are Microscopic: A Transport-Time Perspective. , 2013, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[33]  Pasquale Stano,et al.  Lecithin‐Based Water‐In‐Oil Compartments as Dividing Bioreactors , 2007, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[34]  Shoji Takeuchi,et al.  Lipid-coated microdroplet array for in vitro protein synthesis. , 2011, Analytical chemistry.

[35]  Tetsuya Yomo,et al.  Cell-free protein synthesis from a single copy of DNA in a glass microchamber. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[36]  Hiroyuki Fujita,et al.  Microfabricated arrays of femtoliter chambers allow single molecule enzymology , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[37]  Y. Murakami,et al.  Development of a microchamber array for picoliter PCR. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[38]  A. L. Koch.  What size should a bacterium be? A question of scale. , 1996, Annual review of microbiology.

[39]  R. Zare,et al.  Construction of microfluidic chips using polydimethylsiloxane for adhesive bonding. , 2005, Lab on a chip.

[40]  W. Marshall,et al.  Building the cell: design principles of cellular architecture , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[41]  A J Olson,et al.  Structural symmetry and protein function. , 2000, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[42]  Yasuteru Urano,et al.  Evolution of fluorescein as a platform for finely tunable fluorescence probes. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.