Chemical and spectroscopic characterization of humic acids isolated from different Slovak soil types

Abstract Humic acids isolated from six different Slovak soils have been characterized comparatively by using chemical methods and spectroscopic techniques including ultraviolet-visible (UV-VIS), 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR), fluorescence, and electron spin resonance (ESR). Results from elemental and functional group analyses and spectroscopic data are generally well correlated. Humic acids from the Calcaro-Calcic Chernozem and Gleyic Phaeozem are characterized by a high degree of aromaticity, high content of carboxylic groups and polycondensed aromatic and conjugated structures, low fluorescence intensity with main peaks in the long-wavelength spectral region, and very high organic free-radical concentrations. Differently, HAs from the Dystric Planosol, Eutric Cambisol, Orthic Luvisol, and Stagno-Gleyic Cambisol exhibit low aromaticity and high aliphatic character, low degree of polycondensation, low content of carboxylic groups and organic free radicals, fluorescence in the intermediate- and low-wavelength regions, and the distinct presence of amide groups and polysaccharidic structures. These differences in chemical structure and functionalities suggest a higher degree of humification and higher chemical reactivity for the first two humic acids, with respect to the other four samples. The agronomic functions and environmental implications of the two groups of humic acids examined are, therefore, expected to be markedly different.

[1]  J. C. Río,et al.  Structural differences between humic fractions from different soil types as determined by FT-IR and 13 C-NMR studies , 1989 .

[2]  H. Schulten,et al.  Formation and properties of organic matter in a forest soil, as revealed by its biological activity, wet chemical analysis, CPMAS 13C-NMR spectroscopy and pyrolysis-field ionization mass spectrometry , 1993 .

[3]  P. Hatcher,et al.  Aromaticity of Humic Substances in Soils1 , 1981 .

[4]  R. Malcolm The uniqueness of humic substances in each of soil, stream and marine environments , 1990 .

[5]  J. Bollag,et al.  Detoxification of aquatic and terrestrial sites through binding of pollutants to humic substances , 1992 .

[6]  K. Kumada Chemistry of soil organic matter , 1987 .

[7]  C. Calmon,et al.  Book reviewHumic substances in soil, sediment and water: by G.R. Aiken, D.M. McKnight, R.L. Wersham and P. McCarthy (Eds.), John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1985, xiii + 692 pages, $59.95 , 1986 .

[8]  M. Schnitzer,et al.  Determination of Acidity in Soil Organic Matter , 1965 .

[9]  C. Preston,et al.  Analysis of Humic Acids by Solution and Solid‐state Carbon‐13 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance , 1986 .

[10]  T. Fan,et al.  Characterization of two humic acid fractions from a calcareous vermiculitic soil: implications for the humification process , 1995 .

[11]  C. Preston Applications of NMR to soil organic matter analysis : History and prospects , 1996 .

[12]  K. Yonebayashi,et al.  Chemical and biological studies on environmental humic acids: I. Composition of elemental and functional groups of humic acids , 1988 .

[13]  T. Miano,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION, DIFFERENTIATION, AND CLASSIFICATION OF HUMIC SUBSTANCES BY FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY , 1991 .

[14]  R. Newman,et al.  13C NMR characterization of humic acids from soils of a development sequence , 1991 .

[15]  N. Senesi Application of Electron Spin Resonance (ESR) Spectroscopy in Soil Chemistry , 1990 .

[16]  M. Schnitzer,et al.  Humic acids properties of an argiudoll soil under two tillage systems , 1989 .