Project management vs. systems engineering management: A practitioners' view on integrating the project and product domains

While most Systems Engineering Management (SEM) applications use some subset of traditional Project Management (PM) methods and tools, the actual practice of systems engineering management involves continuous cognitive zigzagging between systems engineering—the product domain—and project management—the project domain. Focusing on seven PM methods, we examine two research questions regarding systems engineering practitioners: (1) While conducting SEM, do they perceive a notion of a project domain, a product domain, and a combined project-product domain? (2) What is the extent to which, and ways by which, systems engineering practitioners deem PM methods as effective for supporting SEM? Using analysis of structured questionnaires among 24 participants, we verified that project and product are indeed viewed as two complementary facets of SEM, and that certain PM methods address both domains better than others with respect to particular examined factors. © 2011 Wiley international, Inc. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Moti Frank 1.6.3 Cognitive and Personality Characteristics of Successful Systems Engineers , 2000 .

[2]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Patterns of Product Development Interactions , 2002 .

[3]  Steve Caplin,et al.  Principles Of Design , 2011 .

[4]  Dov Dori,et al.  8.2.2 A Project‐Product Lifecycle Management approach for improved systems engineering practices , 2008 .

[5]  J. Forrester Industrial Dynamics , 1997 .

[6]  Dov Dori,et al.  1.3.2 Is There a Complete Project Plan? A Model‐Based Project Planning Approach , 2009 .

[7]  Benjamin S. Blanchard,et al.  System Engineering Management , 1991 .

[8]  Dov Dori,et al.  Object-process methodology - a holistic systems paradigm , 2013 .

[9]  R. Likert “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[10]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[11]  C. Heckler A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS™ System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling , 1996 .

[12]  Andrew P. Sage,et al.  Handbook of Systems Engineering and Management , 2011 .

[13]  Larry Hatcher,et al.  A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling , 1994 .

[14]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development , 1994 .

[15]  John N. Warfield,et al.  World dynamics , 1973 .

[16]  David N. Ford,et al.  System Dynamics Applied to Project Management: A Survey, Assessment, and Directions for Future Research , 2007, System Dynamics.

[17]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .