Diffusion coefficient of fluorescein-labeled tubulin in the cytoplasm of embryonic cells of a sea urchin: video image analysis of fluorescence redistribution after photobleaching

The diffusion coefficient of tubulin has been measured in the cytoplasm of eggs and embryos of the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus. We have used brain tubulin, conjugated to dichlorotriazinyl-aminofluorescein, to inject eggs and embryos. The resulting distributions of fluorescence were perturbed by bleaching with a microbeam of light from the 488-nm line of an argon ion laser. Fluorescence redistribution after photobleaching was monitored with a sensitive video camera and photography of the television-generated image. With standard photometric methods, we have calibrated this recording system and measured the rates of fluorescence redistribution for tubulin, conjugated to dichlorotriazinyl-aminofluorescein, not incorporated into the mitotic spindle. The diffusion coefficient (D) was calculated from these data using Fick's second law of diffusion and a digital method for analysis of the photometric curves. We have tested our method by determining D for bovine serum albumin (BSA) under conditions where the value is already known and by measuring D for fluorescein-labeled BSA in sea urchin eggs with a standard apparatus for monitoring fluorescence redistribution after photobleaching. The values agree to within experimental error. Dcytoplasmtubulin = 5.9 +/- 2.2 X 10(-8) cm2/s; DcytoplasmBSA = 8.6 +/- 2.0 X 10(-8) cm2/s. Because DH2OBSA = 68 X 10(-8) cm2/s, these data suggest that the viscosity of sea urchin cytoplasm for protein is about eight times that of water and that most of the tubulin of the sea urchin cytoplasm exists as a dimer or small oligomer, which is unbound to structures that would impede its diffusion. Values and limitations of our method are discussed, and we draw attention to both the variations in D for single proteins in different cells and the importance of D for the upper limit to the rates of polymerization reactions.

[1]  D. Kiehart Studies on the in vivo sensitivity of spindle microtubules to calcium ions and evidence for a vesicular calcium-sequestering system , 1981, The Journal of cell biology.

[2]  D. Taylor,et al.  Mobility of cytoplasmic and membrane-associated actin in living cells. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  B. Geiger,et al.  Mobility of microinjected rhodamine actin within living chicken gizzard cells determined by fluorescence photobleaching recovery , 1982, Cell.

[4]  E. Salmon,et al.  SPINDLE MICROTUBULES: THERMODYNAMICS OF IN VIVO ASSEMBLY AND ROLE IN CHROMOSOME MOVEMENT * , 1975, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[5]  R. Schlegel,et al.  Diffusion of injected macromolecules within the cytoplasm of living cells. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  S. Inoué Cell division and the mitotic spindle , 1981, The Journal of cell biology.

[7]  Katherine Luby-Phelps,et al.  Fluorescent analog cytochemistry , 1984 .

[8]  Y. Hotta,et al.  Cell Division , 2021, Nature.

[9]  E D Salmon,et al.  Tubulin dynamics in cultured mammalian cells , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  T. L. Hill,et al.  Regulation of microtubule and actin filament assembly--disassembly by associated small and large molecules. , 1983, International review of cytology.

[11]  John Crank,et al.  The Mathematics Of Diffusion , 1956 .

[12]  G. Hammes,et al.  A kinetic study of protein-protein interactions. , 1976, Biochemistry.

[13]  E. Salmon,et al.  Rapid rate of tubulin dissociation from microtubules in the mitotic spindle in vivo measured by blocking polymerization with colchicine , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  Philip Rosen,et al.  Molecular Biophysics , 1966, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[15]  M. De Brabander,et al.  Microtubule assembly in living cells after release from nocodazole block: the effects of metabolic inhibitors, taxol and PH. , 1981, Cell biology international reports.

[16]  R. Margolis,et al.  Microtubule treadmills—possible molecular machinery , 1981, Nature.

[17]  J. Feramisco,et al.  Direct visualization of fluorescein-labeled microtubules in vitro and in microinjected fibroblasts , 1981, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  B. Barisas,et al.  Fluorescence photobleaching recovery measurement of protein absolute diffusion constants. , 1979, Biophysical chemistry.

[19]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Measurement of the translational mobility of concanavalin A in glycerol-saline solutions and on the cell surface by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. , 1976, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[20]  G Poste,et al.  Measurement of the lateral mobility of cell surface components in single, living cells by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. , 1976, Journal of supramolecular structure.

[21]  L. Rosenhead Conduction of Heat in Solids , 1947, Nature.

[22]  K. Jacobson,et al.  International workshop on the application of fluorescence photobleaching techniques to problems in cell biology. , 1983, Federation proceedings.

[23]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Properties of the depolymerization products of microtubules from mammalian brain. , 1974, Biochemistry.

[24]  J. McIntosh,et al.  Spindle microtubule dynamics in sea urchin embryos: analysis using a fluorescein-labeled tubulin and measurements of fluorescence redistribution after laser photobleaching , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  W. Webb,et al.  Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. , 1976, Biophysical journal.