Review: Medical Informatics and the Science of Cognition

Recent developments in medical informatics research have afforded possibilities for great advances in health care delivery. These exciting opportunities also present formidable challenges to the implementation and integration of technologies in the workplace. As in most domains, there is a gulf between technologic artifacts and end users. Since medical practice is a human endeavor, there is a need for bridging disciplines to enable clinicians to benefit from rapid technologic advances. This is turn necessitates a broadening of disciplinary boundaries to consider cognitive and social factors pertaining to the design and use of technology. The authors argue for a place of prominence for cognitive science. Cognitive science provides a framework for the analysis and modeling of complex human performance and has considerable applicability to a range of issues in informatics. Its methods have been employed to illuminate different facets of design and implementation. This approach has also yielded insights into the mechanisms and processes involved in collaborative design. Cognitive scientific methods and theories are illustrated in the context of two examples that examine human-computer interaction in medical contexts and computer-mediated collaborative processes. The framework outlined in this paper can be used to refine the process of iterative design, end-user training, and productive practice.

[1]  F. Gremy,et al.  Meeting the Challenge: Informatics and Medical Education , 1983 .

[2]  Joseph Tan,et al.  Health Decision Support Systems , 1998 .

[3]  V. Patel,et al.  Advanced Models of Cognition for Medical Training and Practice , 1992, NATO ASI Series.

[4]  R S LEDLEY,et al.  Reasoning foundations of medical diagnosis; symbolic logic, probability, and value theory aid our understanding of how physicians reason. , 1959, Science.

[5]  W A Wulf,et al.  The collaboratory opportunity. , 1993, Science.

[6]  George Hripcsak,et al.  Research Paper: Knowledge-based Approaches to the Maintenance of a Large Controlled Medical Terminology , 1994, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[7]  V. Patel,et al.  Assessment of a computerized patient record system: a cognitive approach to evaluating medical technology. , 1996, M.D. computing : computers in medical practice.

[8]  A Hasman Challenges for medical informatics in the 21st century. , 1997, International journal of medical informatics.

[9]  Arie Hasman,et al.  A new name, a new scope , 1997 .

[10]  Cathleen Wharton,et al.  Cognitive Walkthroughs: A Method for Theory-Based Evaluation of User Interfaces , 1992, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[11]  Robert A. Greenes,et al.  Intermed: An Internet-based Medical Collaboratory. , 1995 .

[12]  M. Collen A History of Medical Informatics in the United States, 1950 to 1990 , 1995 .

[13]  Alan M Lesgold,et al.  Toward Intelligence Systems for Testing. , 1987 .

[14]  Keith Duncan,et al.  Cognitive Engineering , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[15]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  User Centered System Design , 1986 .

[16]  V L Patel,et al.  Understanding, Navigating and Communicating Knowledge: Issues and Challenges , 1998, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[17]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[18]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  Research Paper: Representing Clinical Guidelines in GLIF: Individual and Collaborative Expertise , 1998, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[19]  Elpida T. Keravnou Deep Models for Medical Knowledge Engineering , 1992 .

[20]  G. Salomon Distributed cognitions : psychological and educational considerations , 1997 .

[21]  N. Meyers,et al.  H = W. , 1964, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  L. Resnick,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction , 2018 .

[23]  Williams Ls Microchips versus stethoscopes: Calgary hospital, MDs face off over controversial computer system. , 1992 .

[24]  R Haux,et al.  Aims and tasks of medical informatics. , 1997, International journal of medical informatics.

[25]  E H Shortliffe,et al.  The science of biomedical computing. , 1984, Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique.

[26]  Marion J. Ball,et al.  Aspects of the Computer-based Patient Record , 1992, Computers in Health Care.

[27]  Robert A. Greenes,et al.  A study of collaboration among medical informatics research laboratories , 1998, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[28]  R A Greenes,et al.  Collaborative medical informatics research using the Internet and the World Wide Web. , 1996, Proceedings : a conference of the American Medical Informatics Association. AMIA Fall Symposium.

[29]  Robert A. Greenes,et al.  Research Paper: The GuideLine Interchange Format: A Model for Representing Guidelines , 1998, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[30]  P C Tang,et al.  Major issues in user interface design for health professional workstations: summary and recommendations. , 1994, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[31]  Homer R. Warner,et al.  Viewpoint: Medical informatics: A Real Discipline? , 1995, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[32]  John M. Carroll Human-computer interaction: psychology as a science of design. , 1997 .

[33]  D. Perkins,et al.  Partners in Cognition: Extending Human Intelligence with Intelligent Technologies , 1991 .

[34]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Cognitive Engineering In Norman , 1986 .

[35]  Mark S. Tuttle Medical Informatics Challenges of the 1990s: Acknowledging Secular Change , 1997, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[36]  R. Ledley,et al.  Reasoning foundations of medical diagnosis. , 1991, M.D. computing : computers in medical practice.

[37]  E. Shortliffe,et al.  Medical informatics. An emerging academic discipline and institutional priority. , 1990, JAMA.

[38]  Brian Shackel,et al.  Human factors for informatics usability , 1991 .