The Representation of Egomotion in the Human Brain

An essential function of visual processing is to establish the position of the body in space and, in concert with the other sense systems, to monitor movement of the whole body, or "egomotion." A key cue to egomotion is optic flow. For example, forward motion through the environment generates an expanding pattern of flow on the retina, and (with eyes fixed centrally) the direction of heading corresponds to the center of expansion [1]. In macaques, visual cortical area MST is sensitive to optic-flow structure [2, 3], and it has been suggested that MST has a central role in the computation of heading [4]. However, here we identify two areas of the human brain that represent visual cues to egomotion more directly than does MST. These areas respond strongly to a single optic-flow stimulus but become relatively unresponsive when the stimulus is surrounded with further flow patches and thereby made inconsistent with egomotion. One is putative area VIP in the anterior portion of the intraparietal sulcus. The other is a new visual area, which we refer to as cingulate sulcus visual area (CSv). Areas V1-V4 and MT respond about equally to both types of flow stimulus. MST has intermediate properties, responding well to multiple patches but with a modest preference for a single, egomotion-compatible patch. We suggest that MST is merely an intermediate processing stage for visual cues to egomotion and that such cues are more comprehensively encoded by VIP and CSv.

[1]  D. Heeger,et al.  Retinotopy and Functional Subdivision of Human Areas MT and MST , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Distinguishing subregions of the human MT+ complex using visual fields and pursuit eye movements. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  D. Burr,et al.  A cortical area that responds specifically to optic flow, revealed by fMRI , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  J. Gibson The perception of the visual world , 1951 .

[5]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Science.

[6]  Michael E. Goldberg,et al.  Posterior Cingulate Cortex and Visuospatial Cognition: Properties of Single Neurons in the Behaving Monkey , 1993 .

[7]  J. Sanes,et al.  Improved Detection of Event-Related Functional MRI Signals Using Probability Functions , 2001, NeuroImage.

[8]  Hilary W. Heuer,et al.  Parietal Area VIP Neuronal Responses to Heading Stimuli Are Encoded in Head-Centered Coordinates , 2004, Neuron.

[9]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. I. A continuum of response selectivity to large-field stimuli. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: congruent visual and somatic response properties. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  M. Sereno,et al.  A human parietal face area contains aligned head-centered visual and tactile maps , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  J Duysens,et al.  Neurons in the ventral intraparietal area of awake macaque monkey closely resemble neurons in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area in their responses to optic flow patterns. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Michael L Platt,et al.  Allocentric Spatial Referencing of Neuronal Activity in Macaque Posterior Cingulate Cortex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Multimodal Coding of Three-Dimensional Rotation and Translation in Area MSTd: Comparison of Visual and Vestibular Selectivity , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Sensitivity to optic flow in human cortical areas MT and MST , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[16]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  D. Burr,et al.  Spatiotopic selectivity of BOLD responses to visual motion in human area MT , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  R Turner,et al.  Optimisation of the 3D MDEFT sequence for anatomical brain imaging: technical implications at 1.5 and 3 T , 2004, NeuroImage.

[19]  S. Grossberg,et al.  A neural model of motion processing and visual navigation by cortical area MST. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Integration of direction signals of image motion in the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque monkey , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[21]  R. Andersen,et al.  Mechanisms of Heading Perception in Primate Visual Cortex , 1996, Science.

[22]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Response of monkey MST neurons to optic flow stimuli with shifted centers of motion , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[23]  A. Wunderlich,et al.  Brain activation during human navigation: gender-different neural networks as substrate of performance , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Michael L Platt,et al.  Visual and saccade-related activity in macaque posterior cingulate cortex. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Lotfi B Merabet,et al.  Visual Topography of Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Representation of Head-Centric Flow in the Human Motion Complex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  E. Maguire,et al.  Neurodevelopmental Aspects of Spatial Navigation: A Virtual Reality fMRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[28]  K. Zilles,et al.  Polymodal Motion Processing in Posterior Parietal and Premotor Cortex A Human fMRI Study Strongly Implies Equivalencies between Humans and Monkeys , 2001, Neuron.

[29]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  A functional link between area MSTd and heading perception based on vestibular signals , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  François Klam,et al.  ã Federation of European Neuroscience Societies Visual±vestibular interactive responses in the macaque ventral intraparietal area (VIP) , 2022 .