Bacterial biofilm under flow: First a physical struggle to stay, then a matter of breathing

Bacterial communities attached to surfaces under fluid flow represent a widespread lifestyle of the microbial world. Through shear stress generation and molecular transport regulation, hydrodynamics conveys effects that are very different by nature but strongly coupled. To decipher the influence of these levers on bacterial biofilms immersed in moving fluids, we quantitatively and simultaneously investigated physicochemical and biological properties of the biofilm. We designed a millifluidic setup allowing to control hydrodynamic conditions and to monitor biofilm development in real time using microscope imaging. We also conducted a transcriptomic analysis to detect a potential physiological response to hydrodynamics. We discovered that a threshold value of shear stress determined biofilm settlement, with sub-piconewton forces sufficient to prevent biofilm initiation. As a consequence, distinct hydrodynamic conditions, which set spatial distribution of shear stress, promoted distinct colonization patterns with consequences on the growth mode. However, no direct impact of mechanical forces on biofilm growth rate was observed. Consistently, no mechanosensing gene emerged from our differential transcriptomic analysis comparing distinct hydrodynamic conditions. Instead, we found that hydrodynamic molecular transport crucially impacts biofilm growth by controlling oxygen availability. Our results shed light on biofilm response to hydrodynamics and open new avenues to achieve informed design of fluidic setups for investigating, engineering or fighting adherent communities.

[1]  A. Price-Whelan,et al.  Redox-driven regulation of microbial community morphogenesis. , 2014, Current opinion in microbiology.

[2]  I. Wang,et al.  Adhesion of Staphylococcus epidermidis to biomedical polymers: contributions of surface thermodynamics and hemodynamic shear conditions. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  L. Sironi,et al.  Image Cross-Correlation Analysis of Time Varying Flows. , 2016, Analytical chemistry.

[4]  Mingming Wu,et al.  Assessing Adhesion Forces of Type I and Type IV Pili of Xylella fastidiosa Bacteria by Use of a Microfluidic Flow Chamber , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[5]  H. Shiku,et al.  Oxygen Permeability of Surface-modified Poly(dimethylsiloxane) Characterized by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy , 2006 .

[6]  Boris Martinac,et al.  Mechanosensitive channels in microbes. , 2010, Annual review of microbiology.

[7]  J. Israelachvili Intermolecular and surface forces , 1985 .

[8]  J. Ghigo Natural conjugative plasmids induce bacterial biofilm development , 2001, Nature.

[9]  Alison M. Forsyth,et al.  Shear stress increases the residence time of adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[10]  V. O'brien,et al.  Pulsatile fully developed flow in rectangular channels , 1975 .

[11]  Zemer Gitai,et al.  Surface attachment induces Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  T. Tolker-Nielsen,et al.  Insight into the microbial multicellular lifestyle via flow‐cell technology and confocal microscopy , 2009, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[13]  Anke Lindner,et al.  Living on the edge: transfer and traffic of E. coli in a confined flow. , 2015, Soft matter.

[14]  N. Balaban,et al.  Adhesion-dependent cell mechanosensitivity. , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[15]  Aaron P. Mosier,et al.  A novel microfluidic device for the in situ optical and mechanical analysis of bacterial biofilms. , 2012, Journal of microbiological methods.

[16]  Nelly Henry,et al.  Mapping of bacterial biofilm local mechanics by magnetic microparticle actuation. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[17]  C. Marvin,et al.  Modelling sediment-microbial dynamics in the South Nation River, Ontario, Canada: Towards the prediction of aquatic and human health risk. , 2011, Water research.

[18]  Biofilm deformation in response to fluid flow in capillaries , 2011, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[19]  R. Belas,et al.  Biofilms, flagella, and mechanosensing of surfaces by bacteria. , 2014, Trends in microbiology.

[20]  Philip S. Stewart,et al.  Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms , 2008, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[21]  T. E. Cloete,et al.  Biofouling and Biocorrosion in Industrial Water Systems , 2005, Critical reviews in microbiology.

[22]  A Libchaber,et al.  E. Coli and oxygen: a motility transition. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[23]  J. Costerton,et al.  Biofilms as complex differentiated communities. , 2002, Annual review of microbiology.

[24]  R. Stocker,et al.  Microfluidics expanding the frontiers of microbial ecology. , 2014, Annual review of biophysics.

[25]  S. Busby,et al.  Host attachment and fluid shear are integrated into a mechanical signal regulating virulence in Escherichia coli O157:H7 , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Junghyun Kim,et al.  Hydrodynamic effects on bacterial biofilm development in a microfluidic environment. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[27]  Jing Geng,et al.  Bacteria Hold Their Breath upon Surface Contact as Shown in a Strain of Escherichia coli, Using Dispersed Surfaces and Flow Cytometry Analysis , 2014, PloS one.

[28]  J. Ghigo,et al.  Finding gene-expression patterns in bacterial biofilms. , 2005, Trends in microbiology.

[29]  M. Robinson,et al.  A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data , 2010, Genome Biology.

[30]  Paul Stoodley,et al.  Bacterial biofilms: from the Natural environment to infectious diseases , 2004, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[31]  R. Kolter,et al.  Microbial sciences: The superficial life of microbes , 2006, Nature.

[32]  P Stoodley,et al.  Applying the digital image correlation method to estimate the mechanical properties of bacterial biofilms subjected to a wall shear stress , 2009, Biofouling.

[33]  C. M. Ott,et al.  Induction of Attachment-Independent Biofilm Formation and Repression of hfq Expression by Low-Fluid-Shear Culture of Staphylococcus aureus , 2011, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[34]  G. Sanguinetti,et al.  Reprogramming of Escherichia coli K-12 Metabolism during the Initial Phase of Transition from an Anaerobic to a Micro-Aerobic Environment , 2011, PloS one.

[35]  H. Stone,et al.  The Mechanical World of Bacteria , 2015, Cell.

[36]  M. Otto Physical stress and bacterial colonization. , 2014, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[37]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Forces involved in bacterial adhesion to hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces. , 2008, Microbiology.

[38]  R. Franke,et al.  Induction of human vascular endothelial stress fibres by fluid shear stress , 1984, Nature.

[39]  A. Packman,et al.  Biofilm responses to smooth flow fields and chemical gradients in novel microfluidic flow cells , 2014, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[40]  T. Wood,et al.  Temporal gene-expression in Escherichia coli K-12 biofilms. , 2007, Environmental microbiology.

[41]  Mark D. Robinson,et al.  edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data , 2009, Bioinform..

[42]  Yves F Dufrêne,et al.  Sticky microbes: forces in microbial cell adhesion. , 2015, Trends in microbiology.

[43]  Matthew A. A. Grant,et al.  The role of mechanical forces in the planar-to-bulk transition in growing Escherichia coli microcolonies , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[44]  J. Tay,et al.  Metabolic response of biofilm to shear stress in fixed‐film culture , 2001, Journal of applied microbiology.

[45]  R. Hozalski,et al.  Effect of strain rate on the mechanical properties of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[46]  H. Stone,et al.  Type IV pili mechanochemically regulate virulence factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  P. Stewart,et al.  Reaction–diffusion theory explains hypoxia and heterogeneous growth within microbial biofilms associated with chronic infections , 2016, npj Biofilms and Microbiomes.

[48]  R. Merkel,et al.  Energy landscapes of receptor–ligand bonds explored with dynamic force spectroscopy , 1999, Nature.

[49]  Zemer Gitai,et al.  Flow directs surface-attached bacteria to twitch upstream. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[50]  Bonnie L. Bassler,et al.  Local and global consequences of flow on bacterial quorum sensing , 2016, Nature Microbiology.

[51]  Cory J. Rupp,et al.  Biofilm material properties as related to shear-induced deformation and detachment phenomena , 2002, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[52]  Wei Shi,et al.  featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features , 2013, Bioinform..

[53]  M. Schembri,et al.  Global gene expression in Escherichia coli biofilms , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[54]  D E Ingber,et al.  The Mechanochemical Basis of Cell and Tissue Regulation , 2004 .

[55]  I. Klapper,et al.  Description of mechanical response including detachment using a novel particle model of biofilm/flow interaction. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[56]  J. Murrell,et al.  The sea-surface microlayer is a gelatinous biofilm , 2009, The ISME Journal.

[57]  G. O’Toole,et al.  Sensational biofilms: surface sensing in bacteria. , 2016, Current opinion in microbiology.

[58]  Viola Vogel,et al.  Bacterial Adhesion to Target Cells Enhanced by Shear Force , 2002, Cell.

[59]  David L. Chopp,et al.  Influence of the Hydrodynamic Environment on Quorum Sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms , 2007, Journal of bacteriology.

[60]  Junghyun Kim,et al.  Microfluidic Approaches to Bacterial Biofilm Formation , 2012, Molecules.

[61]  F. Pignon,et al.  Influence of hydrodynamics on the growth kinetics of glass-adhering Pseudomonas putida cells through a parallel plate flow chamber. , 2013, Biomicrofluidics.

[62]  Cheryl A Nickerson,et al.  Low-shear modeled microgravity: a global environmental regulatory signal affecting bacterial gene expression, physiology, and pathogenesis. , 2003, Journal of microbiological methods.

[63]  Søren Molin,et al.  Global impact of mature biofilm lifestyle on Escherichia coli K‐12 gene expression , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[64]  Z Lewandowski,et al.  Structural deformation of bacterial biofilms caused by short-term fluctuations in fluid shear: an in situ investigation of biofilm rheology. , 1999, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[65]  F P T Baaijens,et al.  Mechanical properties and failure of Streptococcus mutans biofilms, studied using a microindentation device. , 2006, Journal of microbiological methods.

[66]  Mary-Ann Mycek,et al.  Time-resolved optical imaging provides a molecular snapshot of altered metabolic function in living human cancer cell models. , 2006, Optics express.