Patents and the Performance of Voluntary Standard Setting Organizations

Voluntary standard-setting organizations (SSOs) are a common feature of systems industries, where firms supply interoperable components for a shared technology platform. These institutions promote coordinated innovation by providing a forum for collective decision making and a potential solution to the problem of fragmented and overlapping intellectual property rights. This paper examines the economic and technological significance of SSOs by analyzing the flow of citations to a sample of U.S. patents disclosed during the standard-setting process. Our main results show that the age distribution of SSO patent citations is shifted toward later years (relative to an average patent) and that citations increase substantially following standardization. These results suggest that SSOs identify promising technologies and influence their subsequent adoption.

[1]  Marc Rysman,et al.  Identifying the age profile of patent citations: new estimates of knowledge diffusion , 2010 .

[2]  Aija Elina Leiponen,et al.  Competing Through Cooperation: The Organization of Standard Setting in Wireless Telecommunications , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[3]  Stuart J. H. Graham,et al.  Competing on Standards? Entrepreneurship, Intellectual Property and the Platform Paradox , 2007 .

[4]  Josh Lerner,et al.  A Model of Forum Shopping , 2006 .

[5]  Marc Rysman,et al.  Identifying the Age Profile of Patent Citations , 2006 .

[6]  A. Gawer,et al.  Platform Owner Entry and Innovation in Complementary Markets: Evidence from Intel , 2005 .

[7]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Rules of Standard Setting Organizations: An Empirical Analysis , 2005 .

[8]  Neil Gandal,et al.  Intellectual Property and Standardization Committee Participation in the Us Modem Industry , 2004 .

[9]  M. Morelli,et al.  Self Enforcing Voting in International Organizations , 2003 .

[10]  Gregory Tassey,et al.  Methods for Assessing the Economic Impacts of Government R&D , 2003 .

[11]  M.A. Cusumano,et al.  The elements of platform leadership , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[12]  Marcin Strojwas,et al.  Cooperative Marketing Agreements between Competitors: Evidence from Patent Pools , 2003 .

[13]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  Technological Competition and the Structure of the Computer Industry , 2003 .

[14]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Is the Internet a US invention?—an economic and technological history of computer networking , 2002 .

[15]  Rudi Bekkers,et al.  Intellectual Property Rights, Strategic Technology Agreements and Market Structure, The Case of GSM , 2002 .

[16]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy , 2002 .

[17]  Mark A. Lemley.  Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-Setting Organizations , 2002 .

[18]  Neil Gandal,et al.  The Dynamics of Technological Adoption in Hardware/Software Systems: The Case of Compact Disc Players , 2000 .

[19]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[20]  J. Wooldridge.  Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models , 1999 .

[21]  Thomas P. Lyon,et al.  Self-Regulation and Social Welfare: The Political Economy of Corporate Environmentalism , 1998 .

[22]  Jerry Kaplan,et al.  Startup: A Silicon Valley Adventure , 1995 .

[23]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[24]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  The role of the ITU in standardization: Pre-eminence, impotence or rubber stamp? , 1991 .

[25]  R. Grant.  Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, Applications , 1991 .

[26]  M. Cave.  Changing the rules: technological change, international competition and regulation in communications , 1990 .

[27]  Stan J. Liebowitz,et al.  The Fable of the Keys , 1990, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[28]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Coordination Through Committees and Markets , 1987 .

[29]  S. Besen,et al.  Compatibility Standards, Competition, and Innovation in the Broadcasting Industry , 1986 .

[30]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[31]  J. M. Buchanan,et al.  An Economic Theory of Clubs , 1965 .

[32]  Isabelle Liotard,et al.  Les nouvelles facettes de la propriété intellectuelle : stratégies, attaques et menaces , 2007 .

[33]  Josh Lerner,et al.  STANDARD SETTING, PATENTS, AND HOLD-UP , 2007 .

[34]  Shane Greenstein,et al.  Standards and Public Policy , 2006 .

[35]  A. Leiponen.  Competing through cooperation: Standard setting in wireless telecommunications , 2006 .

[36]  A. D. Minin,et al.  A case for non-globalization? The organisation of r&d in the wireless telecommunications industry , 2006 .

[37]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[38]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Innovation and Its Discontents , 2004 .

[39]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Valuable Patents , 2003 .

[40]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Patents, Citations and Innovations , 2002 .

[41]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Choosing the Rules for Formal Standardization , 2002 .

[42]  C. Shapiro.  Setting Compatibility Standards: Cooperation or Collusion? , 2000 .

[43]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[44]  Carl F. Cargill,et al.  Open systems standardization : a business approach , 1997 .

[45]  Robin Mansell,et al.  Standards, innovation and competitiveness : the politics and economics of standards in natural and technical environments , 1995 .

[46]  Marvin A. Sirbu,et al.  Technological Choice in Voluntary Standards Committees: An Empirical Analysis. , 1990 .

[47]  P. David,et al.  The Economics Of Compatibility Standards: An Introduction To Recent Research 1 , 1990 .

[48]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Installed base and compatibility : innovation, product preannouncements and predation , 1986 .

[49]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[50]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .