Effective knowledge transfer in virtual teams: linking contents and mechanisms

This paper addresses the difficulties of knowledge transfer based on the characteristics of knowledge and suggests the possible transfer mechanisms virtual teams might use. Thus far, the discussion on knowledge transfer has tended to be identifying the drivers and inhibitors for effective transfer such as the ability to transfer and receive of the individuals involved, and the context in which the sharing takes place. One question that has received relative little attention and that is central to effective knowledge transfer is when to use what type of transfer mechanism. We propose that all else being equal the choice of mechanisms is determined by the tacitness and embeddedness of the knowledge to be transferred. Knowledge with high degree of tacitness should be transferred by rich media, while knowledge with high embeddedness should be transferred by media with high transfer capacity.

[1]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: four different patterns of managing research and development , 2002 .

[2]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Knowing "What" to Do Is Not Enough: Turning Knowledge into Action , 1999 .

[3]  Alice Lam.  Embedded Firms, Embedded Knowledge: Problems of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in Global Cooperative Ventures , 1997 .

[4]  Joanne Roberts.  From Know-how to Show-how? Questioning the Role of Information and Communication Technologies in Knowledge Transfer , 2000 .

[5]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  H. D. Thomas,et al.  SUCCESSFUL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS , 1998 .

[7]  Lisa Abrams,et al.  Using Mentoring and Storytelling to Transfer Knowledge in the Workplace , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  An Investigation of Media Selection Among Directors and Managers: From "Self" to "Other" Orientation , 1998, MIS Q..

[9]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[10]  O. Lee,et al.  The role of cultural protocol in media choice in a confucian virtual workplace , 2000 .

[11]  David J. Teece,et al.  The Market for Know-How and the Efficient International Transfer of Technology , 1981 .

[12]  Douglas E. Shook,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS OF JOB CATEGORIES AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEVELS TO USE OF COMMUNICATION CHANNELS, INCLUDING ELECTRONIC MAIL: A META-ANALYSIS AND EXTENSION* , 1990 .

[13]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[14]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[15]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[16]  Markus C. Becker.  Managing Dispersed Knowledge: Organizational Problems, Managerial Strategies, and Their Effectiveness , 2001 .

[17]  Cheri Ostroff,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL SOCIALIZATION AS A LEARNING PROCESS: THE ROLE OF INFORMATION ACQUISITION , 2006 .

[18]  Albert Harold Rubenstein,et al.  Managing Technology in the Decentralized Firm , 2001 .

[19]  Ruth C. King,et al.  Media Appropriateness: Effects of Experience on Communication Media Choice , 1997 .

[20]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[21]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies , 2002 .

[22]  Joseph L. Badaracco,et al.  The knowledge link : how firms compete through strategic alliances / Joseph L. Badaracco, Jr. , 1993 .

[23]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[24]  O. Gassmann,et al.  New concepts and trends in international R&D organization , 1999 .

[25]  José Santos,et al.  From global to metanational: how companies win in the knowledge economy , 2001, UBIQ.

[26]  C. Cramton.  The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[27]  S. Collinson.  Knowledge Management Capabilities for Steel Makers: A British-Japanese Corporate Alliance for Organizational Learning , 1999 .

[28]  Arnoud Cyriel Leo,et al.  Tech Talk: How managers are stimulating global R&D communication , 1991 .

[29]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Locating Adaptive Learning: The Situated Nature of Adaptive Learning in Organizations , 1997 .

[30]  Mike Gregory,et al.  Tacit knowledge, the life cycle and international manufacturing transfer , 1997 .

[31]  R. Garud,et al.  TRANSFORMATIVE CAPACITY: CONTINUAL STRUCTURING BY INTERTEMPORAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER , 1994 .

[32]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[33]  Jane S. Webster,et al.  Rational and social theories as complementary explanations of communication media choices: two polic , 1995 .