Quantum structure in competing lizard communities

Almost two decades of research on applications of the mathematical formalism of quantum theory as a modeling tool in domains different from the micro-world has given rise to many successful applications in situations related to human behavior and thought, more specifically in cognitive processes of decision-making and the ways concepts are combined into sentences. In this article, we extend this approach to animal behavior, showing that an analysis of an interactive situation involving a mating competition between certain lizard morphs allows to identify a quantum theoretic structure. More in particular, we show that when this lizard competition is analyzed structurally in the light of a compound entity consisting of subentities, the contextuality provided by the presence of an underlying rock-paper-scissors cyclic dynamics leads to a violation of Bell's inequality, which means it is of a non-classical type. We work out an explicit quantum-mechanical representation in Hilbert space for the lizard situation and show that it faithfully models a set of experimental data collected on three throat-colored morphs of a specific lizard species. Furthermore, we investigate the Hilbert space modeling, and show that the states describing the lizard competitions contain entanglement for each one of the considered confrontations of lizards with different competing strategies, which renders it no longer possible to interpret these states of the competing lizards as compositions of states of the individual lizards.

[1]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Ubiquitous Quantum Structure , 2010 .

[2]  L. Gabora,et al.  Quantum morphogenesis: a variation on Thom's catastrophe theory. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  Marek Czachor,et al.  Darboux-integrable nonlinear Liouville-von Neumann equation , 1998 .

[4]  C. J. van Rijsbergen,et al.  The geometry of information retrieval , 2004 .

[5]  Wolf M. Mooij,et al.  Does “supersaturated coexistence” resolve the “paradox of the plankton”? , 2001 .

[6]  J. Huisman,et al.  Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos , 1999, Nature.

[7]  Barry Sinervo,et al.  Gonadotropin Hormone Modulation of Testosterone, Immune Function, Performance, and Behavioral Trade‐Offs among Male Morphs of the Lizard Uta stansburiana , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[8]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Abstract DNA-type systems , 2004, q-bio/0411031.

[9]  V. Gafiychuk,et al.  Replicator Dynamics and Mathematical Description of Multi-Agent Interaction in Complex Systems , 2004 .

[10]  B. Sinervo,et al.  An experimental test of frequency-dependent selection on male mating strategy in the field , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  Marek Czachor,et al.  Correlation experiments in nonlinear quantum mechanics , 2002 .

[12]  Dirk Aerts,et al.  A possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics , 1986 .

[13]  B. Sinervo,et al.  The Developmental, Physiological, Neural, and Genetical Causes and Consequences of Frequency-Dependent Selection in the Wild , 2006 .

[14]  M. Czachor,et al.  Systems, environments, and soliton rate equations: A non-Kolmogorovian framework for population dynamics , 2013, 1303.0281.

[15]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  A quantum probability explanation for violations of ‘rational’ decision theory , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  B. Sinervo,et al.  The rock–paper–scissors game and the evolution of alternative male strategies , 1996, Nature.

[17]  Marek Czachor,et al.  Darboux covariant equations of von Neumann type and their generalizations , 2002, nlin/0205061.

[18]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Quantum aspects of semantic analysis and symbolic artificial intelligence , 2003, quant-ph/0309022.

[19]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Entanglement Zoo I: Foundational and Structural Aspects , 2013, QI.

[20]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Concepts and Their Dynamics: A Quantum-Theoretic Modeling of Human Thought , 2012, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[21]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  A competitive network theory of species diversity , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  P. Dirac Principles of Quantum Mechanics , 1982 .

[23]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision , 2012 .

[24]  Jean Clobert,et al.  Self-recognition, color signals, and cycles of greenbeard mutualism and altruism. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Barry Sinervo,et al.  Runaway social games, genetic cycles driven by alternative male and female strategies, and the origin of morphs , 2004, Genetica.

[26]  S. Gudder 6 – Probability Manifolds , 1988 .

[27]  Jennifer Trueblood,et al.  A Quantum Probability Account of Order Effects in Inference , 2011, Cogn. Sci..

[28]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Contextual Approach to Quantum Formalism , 2009 .

[29]  Peter Bruza,et al.  Extracting Spooky-Activation-at-a-Distance from Considerations of Entanglement , 2009, QI.

[30]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Quantum dynamics of human decision-making , 2006 .

[31]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A Theory of Concepts and Their Combinations II: A Hilbert Space Representation , 2004 .

[32]  Jerome R Busemeyer,et al.  Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling? , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[33]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum Structure in Cognition , 2008, 0805.3850.

[34]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Applications of Quantum Statistics in Psychological Studies of Decision Processes , 1995 .

[35]  J. Huisman,et al.  Towards a solution of the plankton paradox : the importance of physiology and life history , 2001 .

[36]  I. Pitowsky Quantum Probability ― Quantum Logic , 1989 .

[37]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  On the Foundations of the Theory of Evolution , 2011, 1212.0107.

[38]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Entanglement Zoo II: Examples in Physics and Cognition , 2013, QI.

[39]  Ingrid Daubechies,et al.  Physical justiflcation for using the tensor product to describe two quantum systems as one joint system , 1978 .

[40]  Luigi Accardi,et al.  On the statistical meaning of complex numbers in quantum mechanics , 1982 .

[41]  Shmuel Zamir,et al.  Type Indeterminacy-A Model of the KT-man ( Kahneman Tversky ) , 2003 .

[42]  John Maynard Smith,et al.  The games lizards play , 1996, Nature.

[43]  Jennifer S Trueblood,et al.  A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors. , 2011, Psychological review.

[44]  Jean Clobert,et al.  Models of Density‐Dependent Genic Selection and a New Rock‐Paper‐Scissors Social System , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[45]  N. N. Vorob’ev Consistent Families of Measures and Their Extensions , 1962 .

[46]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum structures, separated physical entities and probability , 1994 .

[47]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum structure and human thought. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[48]  Shmuel Zamir,et al.  Type Indeterminacy: A Model for the KT(Kahneman-Tversky)-Man , 2006, physics/0604166.

[49]  Helly Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung , 1936 .

[50]  Robert A Laird,et al.  Does local competition increase the coexistence of species in intransitive networks? , 2008, Ecology.

[51]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A theory of concepts and their combinations I: The structure of the sets of contexts and properties , 2005 .

[52]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum Entanglement in Concept Combinations , 2013, ArXiv.