National student feedback surveys in distance education: an investigation at the UK Open University

National student feedback surveys are administered in a number of countries, and several of these encompass both campus‐based and distance learning students. The UK Open University achieves a high ranking in the annual National Student Survey (NSS), but there are some anomalies in the results. The NSS questionnaire was administered to three samples of students to explore the origins of these anomalies. The reliability and the validity of the questionnaire were satisfactory, but a substantial proportion of the respondents did not produce valid data. There was a high proportion of ‘not applicable’ responses to items concerned with learning resources and personal development. Other students responded ‘neither agree nor disagree’ to these items when ‘not applicable’ would have been more appropriate. This would have led to low rankings on these scales in the national surveys. Distance learning institutions need to advise their students about the importance of only rating items they have actually experienced or to negotiate changes to the questionnaires themselves if they are to ensure that their activities and achievements are properly represented in national student feedback surveys.

[1]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Monitoring the experiences of graduates in distance education , 2004 .

[2]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  The National Student Survey: development, findings and implications , 2007 .

[3]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Instruments for obtaining student feedback: a review of the literature , 2005 .

[4]  David Kember,et al.  Open Learning Courses for Adults: A Model of Student Progress , 1995 .

[5]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[6]  John P. Robinson,et al.  CHAPTER 1 – Criteria for Scale Selection and Evaluation , 1991 .

[7]  Hamish Coates,et al.  Development of the Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) , 2001 .

[8]  J. T. Richardson What can students’ perceptions of academic quality tell us? Research using the Course Experience Questionnaire , 2009 .

[9]  George D. Kuh The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations , 2009 .

[10]  Robert M. Gonyea,et al.  Using NSSE in institutional research , 2009 .

[11]  Angela P. Wetzel Internet, mail, and mixed‐mode surveys: The tailored design method , 2010 .

[12]  George D. Kuh,et al.  Being (Dis)Engaged in Educationally Purposeful Activities: The Influences of Student and Institutional Characteristics , 2002 .

[13]  P. Ramsden A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire , 1991 .

[14]  Alan Woodley,et al.  Student Progress in Distance Education: Kember's model re-visited , 2001 .

[15]  D. Eastwood,et al.  Counting What Is Measured or Measuring What Counts? League Tables and Their Impact On Higher Education Institutions in England , 2008 .

[16]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in distance education , 2002 .

[17]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Perceptions of Academic Quality among Students with a Hearing Loss in Distance Education , 2001 .