Negotiating Peer Mentoring Roles in Undergraduate Research Lab Settings

Undergraduate research is viewed as an important catalyst for educational engagement and persistence, with an emphasis on the faculty mentoring relationship. Despite the common practice of having multi-tiered lab teams composed of newer undergraduates and more seasoned undergraduates serving as peer mentors, less is understood about the experience of peer mentors. Using the framework of legitimate peripheral participation, this study examined how peer mentors negotiated their roles in the lab. Nested case studies based on interviews with peer mentors, faculty members, and newer students illustrated how peer mentors establish credibility through prior lab experience and faculty-framed authority. Delegating supervision was an important component that helped newer students to accept the authority of the peer mentor. Implications for program development and future research involving peer mentoring are discussed.

[1]  Mentoring Peer Mentors: Mentor Education and Support in the Composition Program , 2008 .

[2]  Tina Chiles.  The construction of an identity as ‘mentor’ in white collar and academic workplaces: A preliminary analysis , 2007 .

[3]  Anne-Barrie Hunter,et al.  The Benefits of Multi-Year Research Experiences: Differences in Novice and Experienced Students’ Reported Gains from Undergraduate Research , 2012, CBE life sciences education.

[4]  Erin M. McCloskey,et al.  What a Difference a Label Makes: Positioning and Response in an Afterschool Tutoring Program , 2013 .

[5]  P. Parker,et al.  Peer Coaching: A Relational Process for Accelerating Career Learning , 2008 .

[6]  C. Moustakas.  Phenomenological Research Methods , 1994 .

[7]  F. Lopez-Real,et al.  Mentors' perceptions of their roles in mentoring student teachers , 2005 .

[8]  George D. Kuh.  High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter , 2008 .

[9]  David Lopatto,et al.  Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[10]  Karin A. Orvis,et al.  Understanding How Peer Mentoring and Capitalization Link STEM Students to Their Majors , 2012 .

[11]  E. Seymour,et al.  Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three‐year study , 2004 .

[12]  Anne-Barrie Hunter,et al.  Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development , 2007 .

[13]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  Scientific Research for Undergraduate Students: A Review of the Literature. , 2010 .

[14]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[15]  L. Behar-Horenstein,et al.  Mentoring Undergraduate Researchers: An Exploratory Study of Students’ and Professors’ Perceptions , 2010 .

[16]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[17]  T. Campbell,et al.  Faculty/Student Mentor Program: Effects on Academic Performance and Retention , 1997 .

[18]  M. Patton.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[19]  Joni Schwartz,et al.  Faculty as undergraduate research mentors for students of color: Taking into account the costs , 2012 .

[20]  유창조.  Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[21]  Jenepher Lennox Terrion,et al.  A taxonomy of the characteristics of student peer mentors in higher education: findings from a literature review , 2007 .