Multisensor data to derive peatland vegetation communities using a fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicle

ABSTRACT The restoration of drained peatlands to re-establish biodiverse peat-forming plant communities and typical habitats is a long-term process. To document this process, monitoring concepts must be found that are as operational, cost-effective and non-invasive as possible for the new sensitive ecosystems. The monitoring of the developing plant communities using multisensory Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) data has great potential. We investigated two fen sites in north-eastern Germany that were rewetted in the late 1990s. The areas were flown with a Fixed-Wing UAV and three sensors (RGB, multispectral, thermal). A multisensor dataset consisting of the sensor data, plant height and five spectral indices was classified with a random forest algorithm. The classification accuracies were 87.1 and 89.0% for 10 and 11 classes for the respective sites. Furthermore, the band importance was analyzed using the Gini index. Plant height in combination with the multispectral information were the most important variables. This study underlines the suitability of UAVs for monitoring spectrally similar vegetation because of their capability to generate 3D surface models using structure-from-motion methods and to carry different sensor systems. In addition, they can be used on a regional scale and mostly independent of cloud cover. Secondary results of the study are that the band importance can be determined by Random Forest algorithms even with few trees (e.g. 10 trees), because the order remains very stable independently of the number of trees.

[1]  E. B. Knipling Physical and physiological basis for the reflectance of visible and near-infrared radiation from vegetation , 1970 .

[2]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[3]  P. Crill,et al.  Ecological controls on methane emissions from a Northern Peatland Complex in the zone of discontinuous permafrost, Manitoba, Canada , 1995 .

[4]  S. Hobbie Temperature and plant species control over litter decomposition in Alaskan tundra , 1996 .

[5]  P. Crill,et al.  Spectral reflectance measurements of boreal wetland and forest mosses , 1997 .

[6]  S. Tarantola,et al.  Detecting vegetation leaf water content using reflectance in the optical domain , 2001 .

[7]  P. Treitz,et al.  Image classification of a northern peatland complex using spectral and plant community data , 2003 .

[8]  Y. Sheng,et al.  A high‐resolution GIS‐based inventory of the west Siberian peat carbon pool , 2004 .

[9]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[10]  Dominik Zak,et al.  Stoffumsetzungsprozesse in Niedermooren und ihr Einfluss auf angrenzende Oberflächengewässer , 2004 .

[11]  S. Frolking,et al.  EU peatlands: Current carbon stocks and trace gas fluxes , 2004 .

[12]  G. Takács,et al.  Restoration of peat-forming vegetation by rewetting species-poor fen grasslands , 2006 .

[13]  Achim Zeileis,et al.  Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[14]  D. Roberts,et al.  Mapping tree and shrub leaf area indices in an ombrotrophic peatland through multiple endmember spectral unmixing , 2007 .

[15]  Bruce W. Pengra,et al.  Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your Institution's Administrator. All Other Uses, Reproduction and Distribution, including without Limitation Comm , 2022 .

[16]  J. Qi,et al.  A classification-based assessment of the optimal spectral and spatial resolutions for Great Lakes coastal wetland imagery , 2007 .

[17]  Yichun Xie,et al.  Remote sensing imagery in vegetation mapping: a review , 2008 .

[18]  Kellie J. Archer,et al.  Empirical characterization of random forest variable importance measures , 2008, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[19]  W. Verhoef,et al.  PROSPECT+SAIL models: A review of use for vegetation characterization , 2009 .

[20]  H. Wanner,et al.  Tree phenology and carbon dioxide fluxes - use of digital photography for process-based interpretation at the ecosystem scale , 2009 .

[21]  S. Zerbe,et al.  Renaturierung von Ökosystemen in Mitteleuropa , 2009 .

[22]  Tiemo Timmermann,et al.  Restaurierung von Mooren , 2009 .

[23]  N. Dise Peatland Response to Global Change , 2009, Science.

[24]  H. Joosten The Global Peatland CO2 Picture: peatland status and drainage related emissions in all countries of the world. , 2009 .

[25]  J. Loisel,et al.  Global peatland dynamics since the Last Glacial Maximum , 2010 .

[26]  J. Couwenberg,et al.  Assessing greenhouse gas emissions from peatlands using vegetation as a proxy , 2011, Hydrobiologia.

[27]  M. Koskinen,et al.  Post-restoration development of organic carbon and nutrient leaching from two ecohydrologically different peatland sites , 2011 .

[28]  E. Karofeld,et al.  Initiation of microtopography in revegetated cutover peatlands , 2011 .

[29]  Stefan Zerbe,et al.  Monitoring of the Vegetation Composition in Rewetted Peatland with Iterative Decision Tree Classification of Satellite Imagery , 2011 .

[30]  Mario Chica-Olmo,et al.  An assessment of the effectiveness of a random forest classifier for land-cover classification , 2012 .

[31]  B. Kleinschmit,et al.  Testing the red edge channel for improving land-use classifications based on high-resolution multi-spectral satellite data , 2012 .

[32]  T. Kleinebecker,et al.  Unmanned aerial vehicles as innovative remote sensing platforms for high‐resolution infrared imagery to support restoration monitoring in cut‐over bogs , 2013 .

[33]  A. Westergaard‐Nielsen,et al.  Camera derived vegetation greenness index as proxy for gross primary production in a low Arctic wetland area , 2013 .

[34]  C. Akumu,et al.  Modeling peatland carbon stock in a delineated portion of the Nayshkootayaow river watershed in Far North, Ontario using an integrated GIS and remote sensing approach , 2014 .

[35]  J. Holden,et al.  Restoration of blanket peatlands. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[36]  Katarzyna Dabrowska-Zielinska,et al.  Monitoring Wetlands Ecosystems Using ALOS PALSAR (L-Band, HV) Supplemented by Optical Data: A Case Study of Biebrza Wetlands in Northeast Poland , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[37]  Bastian Siegmann,et al.  Improved crop classification using multitemporal RapidEye data , 2015, 2015 8th International Workshop on the Analysis of Multitemporal Remote Sensing Images (Multi-Temp).

[38]  S. Page,et al.  Global vulnerability of peatlands to fire and carbon loss , 2015 .

[39]  G. Jurasinski,et al.  Four decades of vegetation development in a percolation mire complex following intensive drainage and abandonment , 2015 .

[40]  Yan Wang,et al.  The Effects of Point or Polygon Based Training Data on RandomForest Classification Accuracy of Wetlands , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[41]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Large Area Mapping of Annual Land Cover Dynamics Using Multitemporal Change Detection and Classification of Landsat Time Series Data , 2015 .

[42]  Heather McNairn,et al.  International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation , 2014 .

[43]  Bastian Siegmann,et al.  Identific ation of Agricultural Crop Types in Northern Israel using Multitemporal RapidEye Data , 2015 .

[44]  Martin J. Wooster,et al.  Tropical Peatland Burn Depth and Combustion Heterogeneity Assessed Using UAV Photogrammetry and Airborne LiDAR , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[45]  H. Joosten,et al.  Peatland Restoration and Ecosystem Services , 2016 .

[46]  Pete Smith,et al.  The role of peatlands in climate regulation , 2016 .

[47]  Mariana Belgiu,et al.  Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions , 2016 .

[48]  Christian Knoth,et al.  High-Resolution Classification of South Patagonian Peat Bog Microforms Reveals Potential Gaps in Up-Scaled CH4 Fluxes by use of Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) and CIR Imagery , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[49]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Seeing the forest from drones: Testing the potential of lightweight drones as a tool for long-term forest monitoring , 2016 .

[50]  B. Kløve,et al.  Erosion mechanisms and sediment sources in a peatland forest after ditch cleaning , 2016 .

[51]  Luke A. Brown,et al.  On the relationship between continuous measures of canopy greenness derived using near-surface remote sensing and satellite-derived vegetation products , 2017 .

[52]  Heather McNairn,et al.  Image Classification Using RapidEye Data: Integration of Spectral and Textual Features in a Random Forest Classifier , 2017, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[53]  H. Joosten,et al.  The peatland map of Europe , 2017 .

[54]  N. Holden,et al.  Detecting peatland drains with Object Based Image Analysis and Geoeye-1 imagery , 2017, Carbon balance and management.

[55]  J. Saastamoinen,et al.  Anthropogenic habitat disturbance induces a major biodiversity change in habitat specialist bryophytes of boreal springs , 2017 .

[56]  G. Jurasinski,et al.  From meadow to shallow lake: Monitoring secondary succession in a coastal fen after rewetting by flooding based on aerial imagery and plot data , 2017 .

[57]  Gregory J. McDermid,et al.  A New Method to Map Groundwater Table in Peatlands Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[58]  Raymond Soffer,et al.  Spectro-spatial relationship between UAV derived high resolution DEM and SWIR hyperspectral data: application to an ombrotrophic peatland , 2017, Remote Sensing.

[59]  Lukas W. Lehnert,et al.  From local spectral measurements to maps of vegetation cover and biomass on the Qinghai-Tibet-Plateau: Do we need hyperspectral information? , 2017, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[60]  G. Forlani,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Systems and DSM matching for rock glacier monitoring , 2017 .

[61]  Michael Palace,et al.  Determining Subarctic Peatland Vegetation Using an Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[62]  M. Kalacska,et al.  Evaluation of phenospectral dynamics with Sentinel-2A using a bottom-up approach in a northern ombrotrophic peatland , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[63]  H. Perotto-Baldivieso,et al.  Effects of grazing pressure on plant species composition and water presence on bofedales in the Andes mountain range of Bolivia. , 2018 .

[64]  Alysa A. Gauci,et al.  Assessing the Geospatial Accuracy of Aerial Imagery Collected with Various UAS Platforms , 2018 .

[65]  Rebekka R. E. Artz,et al.  Potential for using remote sensing to estimate carbon fluxes across northern peatlands - A review. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[66]  Enoc Sanz-Ablanedo,et al.  Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Postfire Vegetation Survey Campaigns through Large and Heterogeneous Areas: Opportunities and Challenges , 2018, Sensors.

[67]  G. McDermid,et al.  UAV Remote Sensing Can Reveal the Effects of Low‐Impact Seismic Lines on Surface Morphology, Hydrology, and Methane (CH4) Release in a Boreal Treed Bog , 2018 .

[68]  J. Labadz,et al.  The potential of geospatial technology for monitoring peatland environments , 2018 .

[69]  R. Cao,et al.  The effect of drainage on CO2, CH4 and N2O emissions in the Zoige peatland: a 40-month in situ study. , 2018 .

[70]  Hamid Darabi,et al.  Use of remote sensing to analyse peatland changes after drainage for peat extraction , 2018, Land Degradation & Development.

[71]  L. Menichetti,et al.  The underappreciated potential of peatlands in global climate change mitigation strategies , 2018, Nature Communications.

[72]  B. Brisco,et al.  Spectral analysis of wetlands using multi-source optical satellite imagery , 2018, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[73]  Filiberto Chiabrando,et al.  UAV photogrammetry for archaeological site survey. 3D models at the Hierapolis in Phrygia (Turkey) , 2018 .

[74]  A. Laine,et al.  Impacts of drainage, restoration and warming on boreal wetland greenhouse gas fluxes. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.