Occupants' interaction with low-carbon retrofitted homes and its impact on energy use

Current regulatory and other policy trends in housing refurbishment relating to low-carbon performance standards tend to involve complex technologies and systems as well as innovative solutions to achieve 80p emissions reduction in line with the UK national target for 2050. Indicators of domestic energy performance tend to assume ideal performance of materials, complex systems and services, and that they are installed to high standards and under specific conditions, as well as rational occupant behaviour and interactions. Previous studies exploring the influence of socio-technical factors on the UK’s domestic energy use highlight that one of the main reasons for under-performance of individual projects is the lack of understanding of how people interact with domestic technology. Considering this, and given that there is still little evidence on deep refurbishments that implement low-carbon 'whole house' approaches in the UK, this research explored occupants' interaction with heating and ventilation measures as these were designed, installed and operated. The main concern was to identify the type of interactions that occur between occupants (social housing tenants) and building systems (mainly low-carbon heating and ventilation systems), and how that influences actual energy use. Using a sample of 26 social housing properties involved in the Retrofit for the Future competition in the UK, the study employed an socio-technical mixed methods approach, in which qualitative and quantitative empirical data were explored together, cross-checking occupants' 'doings' and 'sayings'. A combination of theories was used to analyse the complex interrelated factors involved in users’ interaction with building systems. The analysis identifies key factors that affect significantly occupants’ everyday practices and their interactions with the new measures: thermal comfort and pastexperiences with measures and controls; knowledge and skills (of both occupants and those involved in the project); design of the technical interventions (systems/measures) and quality of their installation. The findings from this research showed that active measures (such as intelligent and conventional heating controls, MVHR boosters, etc.) fostered direct interaction with active users when there were no design or installation faults. On the contrary, low-carbon measures that are designed and installed to be passive (such as MVHR systems operation) tend, in practice, to involve indirect interactions with active users. The research findings provide an insight into the 'in-use' factors, demonstrating to policy makers and implementers of mass refurbishment programmes the need for a framework where critical combinations of different measures and design solutions are targeted on specific house types, locations and households, in order to achieve maximum savings. Higher standards in installation of the new measures and improved quality control are also found to be a key part of refurbishment policies.

[1]  Rajat Gupta,et al.  Understanding occupants: feedback techniques for large-scale low-carbon domestic refurbishments , 2010 .

[2]  Kathryn B. Janda,et al.  Buildings don't use energy: people do , 2011 .

[3]  Fionn Stevenson,et al.  The usability of control interfaces in low-carbon housing , 2013 .

[4]  F. E. Wolfgang Preiser,et al.  Toward Universal Design Evaluation , 2001 .

[5]  Linda Taylor,et al.  Fuel Poverty: From Cold Homes to Affordable Warmth , 1993 .

[6]  Baizhan Li,et al.  Occupants’ behavioural adaptation in workplaces with non-central heating and cooling systems , 2012 .

[7]  Theodore R. Schatzki,et al.  Practices and Actions A Wittgensteinian Critique of Bourdieu and Giddens , 1997 .

[8]  T. Crosbie,et al.  Energy-efficiency interventions in housing: learning from the inhabitants , 2010 .

[9]  Loren Lutzenhiser,et al.  A cultural model of household energy consumption , 1992 .

[10]  Theodore R. Schatzki,et al.  The site of the social , 2002 .

[11]  Emma Hinton,et al.  Review of the literature relating to comfort practices and socio-technical systems , 2010 .

[12]  Jerome Billeter,et al.  Annual Fuel Poverty Statistics report 2015 , 2015 .

[13]  R. Dear,et al.  Thermal adaptation in the built environment: a literature review , 1998 .

[14]  Interim Progress Report : Closing the gap between design and as-built performance , 2013 .

[15]  Darren Holloway,et al.  Water Consumption and the Built Environment: A Social and Behavioural Analysis , 2005 .

[16]  M. Aune Energy comes home , 2007 .

[17]  Clive M.J. Warren,et al.  Environmental sustainability: understanding the attitudes and behaviour of Australian households , 2010 .

[18]  David T. Harrje,et al.  Instrumentation for monitoring energy usage in buildings at Twin Rivers , 1978 .

[19]  Marilyn A. Brown,et al.  Understanding Residential Energy Conservation through Attitudes and Beliefs , 1983 .

[20]  Tracey Crosbie,et al.  Household Energy Studies: The Gap between Theory and Method , 2006 .

[21]  上園 昌武,et al.  国内外の環境問題のとりくみ ECEEE 2007 Summer Study 'Saving energy--just do it !'参加報告 , 2007 .

[22]  Marcia Hill Gossard,et al.  Lifestyle , Status and Energy Consumption , 2000 .

[23]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Evaluating housing performance in relation to human behaviour: new challenges , 2010 .

[24]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  STRUCTURAL-BEHAVIORAL DETERMINANTS OF RESIDENTIAL ENERGY USE: SUMMER ELECTRICITY USE IN DAVIS? , 1984 .

[25]  Ron Campbell,et al.  Time to reconsider UK energy and fuel poverty policies , 2011 .

[26]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[27]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[28]  Koen Steemers,et al.  Modelling domestic energy consumption at district scale: A tool to support national and local energy policies , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[29]  Loren Lutzenhiser,et al.  What's Missing in Theories of the Residential Energy User , 2010 .

[30]  Tim. Chatterton,et al.  An introduction to thinking about 'energy behaviour': A multi-model approach , 2011 .

[31]  H. Dowlatabadi,et al.  Models of Decision Making and Residential Energy Use , 2007, Renewable Energy.

[32]  T. Schatzki Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social , 1996 .

[33]  K. Steemers,et al.  A method of formulating energy load profile for domestic buildings in the UK , 2005 .

[34]  S. Owens,et al.  How to change attitudes and behaviours in the context of energy , 2008 .

[35]  Darren Robinson,et al.  A generalised stochastic model for the simulation of occupant presence , 2008 .

[36]  Loren Lutzenhiser,et al.  Social structures and economic conduct: Interpreting variations in household energy consumption , 1991 .

[37]  Olivia Guerra-Santin,et al.  Monitoring the performance of low energy dwellings: Two UK case studies , 2013 .

[38]  Hom B. Rijal,et al.  Developing occupancy feedback from a prototype to improve housing production , 2010 .

[39]  Tim Jackson,et al.  Missing carbon reductions? Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households , 2010, Energy Policy.

[40]  Alan Murie,et al.  Housing Policy and Practice , 1982 .

[41]  E. Shove,et al.  Contracting knowledge: the organizational limits to interdisciplinary energy efficiency research and development in the US and the UK , 1999 .

[42]  Jerome Billeter,et al.  Warm Homes, Greener Homes - A strategy for household energy management , 2010 .

[43]  Mark Martin,et al.  Post-occupancy evaluation: benefits and barriers , 2001 .

[44]  D. M. Gann,et al.  Closing the loop between design and use: post-occupancy evaluation , 2001 .

[45]  Darren Robinson,et al.  Stochastic Simulation of Occupant Presence and Behaviour in Buildings , 2007 .

[46]  Post-Occupancy – Squaring the Circle : A Case Study on Innovative Social Housing in Aberdeenshire , Scotland , 2004 .

[47]  Loren Lutzenhiser,et al.  The "Average American" Unmasked: Social Structure and Differences in Household Energy Use and Carbon Emissions , 2008 .

[48]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Assessing building performance in use 3: energy performance of the Probe buildings , 2001 .

[49]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  THE PROBE OCCUPANT SURVEYS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS , 1999 .

[50]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[51]  Michael I. Gentry,et al.  Central heating thermostat settings and timing: building demographics , 2010 .

[52]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Two Theories of Home Heat Control , 1986, Cogn. Sci..

[53]  Jacqueline C. Vischer,et al.  Towards a user-centred theory of the built environment , 2008 .

[54]  D. Jenkins,et al.  The value of retrofitting carbon-saving measures into fuel poor social housing , 2010 .

[55]  Sarah C. Darby,et al.  Social learning and public policy: Lessons from an energy-conscious village , 2006 .

[56]  Gail Brager,et al.  Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference , 1998 .

[57]  Jing Liu,et al.  An investigation of thermal comfort adaptation behaviour in office buildings in the UK , 2014 .

[58]  N. Eyre,et al.  Lessons from energy efficiency policy and programmesin the UK from 1973 to 2013 , 2014 .

[59]  M. McMichael A social capital approach to household energy consumption , 2007 .

[60]  Kirsten Gram-Hanssen,et al.  Standby Consumption in Households Analyzed With a Practice Theory Approach , 2009 .

[61]  Simon Guy,et al.  The Sociology of Energy, Buildings and the Environment: Constructing Knowledge, Designing Practice , 2001 .

[62]  H. Klein,et al.  The Social Construction of Technology: Structural Considerations , 2002 .

[63]  S. Sorrell,et al.  Improving the evidence base for energy policy: the role of systematic reviews , 2007 .

[64]  Mark W. Newman,et al.  Learning from a learning thermostat: lessons for intelligent systems for the home , 2013, UbiComp.

[65]  Toby Harris,et al.  Energy and Social Policy (Routledge Revivals) , 2014 .

[66]  Gert Spaargaren,et al.  Theories of practices: Agency, technology, and culture. Exploring the relevance of practice theories for the governance of sustainable consumption practices in the new world-order , 2011 .

[67]  Koen Steemers,et al.  Thermal performance of a naturally ventilated building using a combined algorithm of probabilistic occupant behaviour and deterministic heat and mass balance models , 2009 .

[68]  Wolfgang F.E. Preiser and Ulrich Schramm A conceptual framework for building performance evaluation , 2006 .

[69]  Mike Hazas,et al.  The significance of difference:understanding variation in household energy consumption , 2011 .

[70]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  Users, Technologies and Expectations of Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience , 2003 .

[71]  Loren Lutzenhiser,et al.  Sticky Points in Modeling Household Energy Consumption , 2010 .

[72]  Jorge Martínez Gil,et al.  Realistic User Behavior Modeling for Energy Saving in Residential Buildings , 2014, 2014 25th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications.

[73]  Loren Lutzenhiser,et al.  A theory-based approach to market transformation , 2000 .

[74]  Michael E. Stone,et al.  Social Housing in the UK and US: Evolution, Issues and Prospects , 2003 .

[75]  David Corne,et al.  Social networks save energy: optimizing energy consumption in an ecovillage via agent-based simulation , 2010 .

[76]  Ardeshir Mahdavi,et al.  TOWARD EMPIRICALLY-BASED MODELS OF PEOPLE ' S PRESENCE AND ACTIONS IN BUILDINGS , 2009 .

[77]  P. Stern New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior , 2000 .

[78]  J. Hills,et al.  Ends and Means: The Future Roles of Social Housing in England , 2007 .

[79]  Julian Padget,et al.  Modelling UK domestic energy and carbon emissions: an agent-based approach , 2011 .

[80]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[81]  Jonathan Bradshaw,et al.  Social policy options and fuel poverty , 1983 .

[82]  Gavin Killip,et al.  Building Expertise: Renovation as Professional Innovation , 2013 .

[83]  Robert Cohen,et al.  Mandating transparency about building energy performance in use , 2015 .

[84]  Paul S Phillips,et al.  Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour to investigate the determinants of recycling behaviour: a case study from Brixworth, UK , 2004 .

[85]  Isaac A. Meir,et al.  Post-Occupancy Evaluation: An Inevitable Step Toward Sustainability , 2009 .

[86]  Ray Galvin,et al.  Introducing the prebound effect: the gap between performance and actual energy consumption , 2012 .

[87]  Alex Summerfield,et al.  Carbon Reduction in Buildings (CaRB) - Understanding the social and technical factors that influence energy use in UK buildings , 2006 .

[88]  Charles Vlek,et al.  Essential psychology for environmental policy making , 2000 .

[89]  Gavin Killip,et al.  Building Expertise : Identifying policy gaps and new ideas in housing eco-renovation in the UK and France , 2013 .

[90]  Carol Propper,et al.  Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion , 2001 .

[91]  S. Barr,et al.  The household energy gap: examining the divide between habitual- and purchase-related conservation behaviours , 2005 .

[92]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 1: A portfolio of feedback techniques , 2005 .

[93]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Incentives, Morality, Or Habit? Predicting Students’ Car Use for University Routes With the Models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis , 2003 .

[94]  G. J. Levermore,et al.  Occupants' assessments of indoor environments: Questionnaire and rating score method , 1994 .

[95]  Michael A. Humphreys,et al.  ADAPTIVE THERMAL COMFORT AND SUSTAINABLE THERMAL STANDARDS FOR BUILDINGS , 2002 .

[96]  Paul C. Stern,et al.  Blind spots in policy analysis: What economics doesn't say about energy use , 1986 .

[97]  Steven K. Firth,et al.  Carbon emissions and the case for joined-up research: Adding value to household and building energy datasets , 2006 .

[98]  Tianzhen Hong,et al.  Occupant behavior modeling for building performance simulation: Current state and future challenges , 2015 .

[99]  R. Cole,et al.  Re-contextualizing the notion of comfort , 2008 .

[100]  W. Kempton,et al.  The consumer's energy analysis environment , 1994 .

[101]  Ardeshir Mahdavi Patterns and Implications of User Control Actions in Buildings , 2009 .

[102]  Tracey Crosbie,et al.  Potential for reducing electricity demand for lighting in households: An exploratory socio-technical study , 2009 .

[103]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Building evaluation: practice and principles , 2010 .

[104]  Kevin J. Lomas,et al.  Carbon reduction in existing buildings: a transdisciplinary approach , 2010 .

[105]  G. Hitchcock,et al.  An integrated framework for energy use and behaviour in the domestic sector , 1993 .

[106]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 3: Case studies of the use of techniques in the feedback portfolio , 2005 .

[107]  S. Sorrell,et al.  Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review , 2009 .

[108]  Kirsten Gram-Hanssen,et al.  Residential heat comfort practices: understanding users , 2010 .

[109]  A. Carlsson-kanyama,et al.  Energy efficiency in residences - Challenges for women and men in the North , 2007 .

[110]  Rajat Gupta,et al.  Understanding the Gap between ‘as Designed’ and ‘as Built’ Performance of a New Low Carbon Housing Development in UK , 2013 .

[111]  Kirsten Gram-Hanssen,et al.  Understanding change and continuity in residential energy consumption , 2011 .

[112]  K. Steemers,et al.  Household energy consumption: a study of the role of occupants , 2009 .

[113]  Sarah C. Darby,et al.  Energy feedback in buildings: improving the infrastructure for demand reduction , 2008 .

[114]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[115]  Jillian Leigh Anable Mobility management in the leisure sector : the application, psychological theory and behavioural segmentation , 2002 .

[116]  Jing Liu,et al.  A method to weight three categories of adaptive thermal comfort , 2012 .

[117]  A. Warde Consumption and Theories of Practice , 2005 .

[118]  Chris Watson,et al.  Review of Building Quality Using Post Occupancy Evaluation , 2003 .

[119]  T. Oreszczyn,et al.  Two models for benchmarking UK domestic delivered energy , 2010 .

[120]  Andreas Reckwitz Toward a Theory of Social Practices , 2002 .

[121]  Lee Schipper,et al.  Linking Life-Styles And Energy Use: A Matter Of Time , 1989 .

[122]  Kirsten Gram-Hanssen,et al.  New needs for better understanding of household's energy consumption – behaviour, lifestyle or practices? , 2014 .

[123]  Wolfgang F.E. Preiser and Jacqueline C. Vischer,et al.  The evolution of building performance evaluation: an introduction , 2006 .

[124]  C. Zimring,et al.  Post-Occupancy Evaluation , 1980 .

[125]  Robert Lowe,et al.  Lessons from Stamford Brook: understanding the gap between designed and real performance , 2008 .

[126]  John Law,et al.  Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity , 1992 .

[127]  P. Stern What psychology knows about energy conservation. , 1992 .

[128]  Guy St John Hitchcock The human dimension of domestic energy use : an integrated approach , 1995 .

[129]  Mithra Moezzi,et al.  Is Efficiency Enough? Towards a New Framework for Carbon Savingsin the California Residential Sector , 2005 .

[130]  Andreas Reckwitz Theorizing Toward a Theory of Social Practices : A Development in Culturalist , 2002 .

[131]  P Pieter-Jan Hoes,et al.  User behavior in whole building simulation , 2009 .

[132]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  Relating Attitudes to Residential Energy Use , 1981 .