The stiffness of unsaturated railway formations

The rational design of a substructure to support a rail track requires an estimation of the stiffness value of the formation on which it is to be built. Stiffness values derived from back-analyses of deformations of the ground beneath the track have been found by the authors to be much higher than those predicted from laboratory element testing on saturated specimens. This may be because of differences in compaction between field and laboratory, or because suctions created by lack of saturation play a key role in controlling stiffness, and therefore the performance of the track when in use. To test the latter hypothesis a laboratory study has been carried out on material representative of that found in South African railway formations. This was tested at constant dry density and various water contents, with matric suctions determined using different established techniques, and very-small-strain stiffness levels obtained from resonant column testing. A suction stress characteristic curve was developed to identify the contribution of suction to the overall effective stress for this material. The results show that suction can indeed be an important contributing factor to the magnitude of stiffness. For material tested at constant dry density, the stiffness initially increases with reducing compaction water content, and therefore with increasing suction. It subsequently reduces back towards the saturated value as the compaction water content approaches zero, even though the matric suction continues to increase. The relative increase in very-small-strain stiffness due to suction depends, to a large extent, on the net normal stress during the stiffness measurement. The effect of matric suction is proportionately greatest at the low net normal stress levels that apply for shallow infrastructures such as rail formations. Also, the operational stiffness depends not only on the current water content (and therefore suction), but also on the water content at which the material has been compacted.

[1]  C.R.I. Clayton,et al.  Deformation measurement on a heavy haul track formation. , 2005 .

[2]  K. Stokoe,et al.  Shear Modulus: A Time-Dependent Soil Property , 1978 .

[3]  J. Burland,et al.  Suction and volume changes of a bentonite-enriched sand , 1999 .

[4]  P. J. Grabe,et al.  Effects of Principal Stress Rotation on Permanent Deformation in Rail Track Foundations , 2009 .

[5]  R. J. Chandler,et al.  The filter-paper method of suction measurement , 1986 .

[6]  John Burland,et al.  A new instrument for the measurement of soil moisture suction , 1993 .

[7]  P. R. Vaughan,et al.  The general and congruent effects of structure in natural soils and weak rocks , 1990 .

[8]  C.R.I. Clayton,et al.  The Stokoe resonant column apparatus: effects of stiffness, mass and specimen fixity , 2009 .

[9]  Ning Lu,et al.  Suction Stress Characteristic Curve for Unsaturated Soil , 2006 .

[10]  C.R.I. Clayton,et al.  Stiffness at small strain: research and practice , 2011 .

[11]  C. Chan,et al.  RESILIENCE CHARACTERISTICS OF SUBGRADE SOILS AND THEIR RELATION TO FATIGUE FAILURES IN ASPHALT PAVEMENTS , 1962 .

[12]  A. d'Onofrio,et al.  Small strain behavior of a silty sand in controlled-suction resonant column torsional shear tests , 2002 .

[13]  J. D. Frost,et al.  A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE MOIST TAMPING TECHNIQUE , 2003 .

[14]  Dingqing Li,et al.  Resilient modulus for fine-grained subgrade soils , 1994 .

[15]  K. Terzaghi Theoretical Soil Mechanics , 1943 .

[16]  Ernest T. Selig,et al.  Method for Railroad Track Foundation Design. II: Applications , 1998 .

[17]  John T Harvey,et al.  Normalizing the behavior of unsaturated granular pavement materials , 2004 .

[18]  Harianto Rahardjo,et al.  Factors affecting the filter paper method for total and matric suction measurements , 2002 .

[19]  C.R.I. Clayton,et al.  Effects of Principal Stress Rotation on Resilient Behavior in Rail Track Foundations , 2014 .