Improved Prediction of Stream Flow Based on Updating Land Cover Maps with Remotely Sensed Forest Change Detection

The water balance in a watershed can be disrupted by forest disturbances such as harvests and fires. Techniques to accurately and efficiently map forest cover changes due to disturbance are evolving quickly, and it is of interest to ask how useful maps of different types of disturbances over time can be in the prediction of water yield. We assessed the benefits of using land cover maps produced at annual vs. five-year intervals in the prediction of monthly streamflows across 10 watersheds contained entirely within the US National Forest System. We found that annually updating land cover maps with forest disturbance data significantly improved water yield predictions using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT; p < 0.01 improvement for both the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency measure and the ratio of the root mean square error to the standard deviation of the measured data). Improvement related to using annually updated land cover maps was directly related to the amount of disturbance observed in a watershed. Our results lay a foundation to apply new high-resolution disturbance datasets in the field of hydrologic modeling to monitor ungauged watersheds and to explore potential water yield changes in watersheds if climate conditions or management practices were to change forest disturbance processes.

[1]  Chengquan Huang,et al.  Long-Term Post-Disturbance Forest Recovery in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem Analyzed Using Landsat Time Series Stack , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[2]  Shuguang Liu,et al.  Projecting the land cover change and its environmental impacts in the Cedar River Basin in the Midwestern United States , 2013 .

[3]  Charles A. Troendle,et al.  The Effect of Timber Harvest on the Fool Creek Watershed, 30 Years Later , 1985 .

[4]  Brad Quayle,et al.  Establishing a nationwide baseline of historical burn-severity data to support monitoring of trends in wildfire effects and national fire policies. , 2010 .

[5]  Xuexia Chen,et al.  Using lidar and effective LAI data to evaluate IKONOS and Landsat 7 ETM+ vegetation cover estimates in a ponderosa pine forest , 2004 .

[6]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Introducing a new open source GIS user interface for the SWAT model , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[7]  S. Goward,et al.  An automated approach for reconstructing recent forest disturbance history using dense Landsat time series stacks , 2010 .

[8]  M. Adams,et al.  Long-term impacts of forest treatments on water yield: a summary for northeastern USA , 1993 .

[9]  L. M. Risse,et al.  Modeling phosphorus in the Lake Allatoona watershed using SWAT: II. Effect of land use change. , 2009, Journal of environmental quality.

[10]  Naresh Pai,et al.  SWAT2009_LUC: A Tool to Activate the Land Use Change Module in SWAT 2009 , 2011 .

[11]  Zhe Zhu,et al.  Mapping forest change using stacked generalization: An ensemble approach , 2018 .

[12]  Wenzhao Liu,et al.  Impacts of land use change and climate variability on hydrology in an agricultural catchment on the Loess Plateau of China , 2009 .

[13]  M. D. Nelson,et al.  Conterminous U.S. and Alaska Forest Type Mapping Using Forest Inventory and Analysis Data , 2008 .

[14]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations , 2007 .

[15]  D. Wittwer,et al.  Aerial detection surveys in the United States , 2008 .

[16]  Xing Ma,et al.  Response of hydrological processes to land‐cover and climate changes in Kejie watershed, south‐west China , 2009 .

[17]  Andrew W. Western,et al.  A review of paired catchment studies for determining changes in water yield resulting from alterations in vegetation , 2005 .

[18]  Kangsheng Wu,et al.  Hydrologic comparison between a forested and a wetland/lake dominated watershed using SWAT , 2008 .

[19]  Idris A. Eckley,et al.  changepoint: An R Package for Changepoint Analysis , 2014 .

[20]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  Effects of land cover change on streamflow in the interior Columbia River Basin (USA and Canada) , 2000 .

[21]  J. Arnold,et al.  Development of a snowfall-snowmelt routine for mountainous terrain for the soil water assessment tool (SWAT) , 2002 .

[22]  T. A. Black,et al.  Evapotranspiration and canopy characteristics of two lodgepole pine stands following mountain pine beetle attack , 2014 .

[23]  J. Wickham,et al.  Completion of the 2001 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States , 2007 .

[24]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  SWAT: Model Use, Calibration, and Validation , 2012 .

[25]  Assefa M. Melesse,et al.  EVALUATION OF THE SWAT MODEL'S SNOWMELT HYDROLOGY IN A NORTHWESTERN MINNESOTA WATERSHED , 2005 .

[26]  E. Engman.  Principles of Forest Hydrology , 1983 .

[27]  Bernard A. Engel,et al.  HYDROLOGIC PARAMETERIZATION OF WATERSHEDS FOR RUNOFF PREDICTION USING SWAT 1 , 1998 .

[28]  G. Ghaffari,et al.  SWAT‐simulated hydrological impact of land‐use change in the Zanjanrood basin, Northwest Iran , 2010 .

[29]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Status of Automatic Calibration for Hydrologic Models: Comparison with Multilevel Expert Calibration , 1999 .

[30]  Evan B. Brooks,et al.  How Similar Are Forest Disturbance Maps Derived from Different Landsat Time Series Algorithms , 2017 .

[31]  Lu Zhang,et al.  Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale , 2001 .

[32]  G. Schwarz,et al.  State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) Data Base for the Conterminous United States , 1995 .

[33]  Mingteh Chang,et al.  Forest Hydrology : An Introduction to Water and Forests, Third Edition , 2012 .

[34]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing of the Canopy Structure and Biophysical Properties of Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forests , 1999 .

[35]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[36]  Hans R. Zuuring,et al.  Hydrologic Calibration and Validation of SWAT in a Snow‐Dominated Rocky Mountain Watershed, Montana, U.S.A. 1 , 2008 .

[37]  Dinámica del uso de la tierra y de la oferta hídrica en la cuenca del río Guacerique, Tegucigalpa, Honduras , 2005 .

[38]  Chaopeng Shen,et al.  Evaluating the impacts of land use changes on hydrologic responses in the agricultural regions of Michigan and Wisconsin , 2011 .

[39]  Z. Holden,et al.  Climate Change, Forests, Fire, Water, and Fish: Building resilient landscapes, streams, and managers , 2015 .

[40]  Assefa M. Melesse,et al.  EFFECTS OF STATSGO AND SSURGO AS INPUTS ON SWAT MODEL'S SNOWMELT SIMULATION 1 , 2006 .

[41]  R. Reedy,et al.  Impact of land use and land cover change on groundwater recharge and quality in the southwestern US , 2005 .

[42]  Debra K. Meyer,et al.  Completion of the National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 1992–2001 Land Cover Change Retrofit product , 2009 .

[43]  C. Justice,et al.  High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change , 2013, Science.

[44]  Mazdak Arabi,et al.  ROLE OF WATERSHED SUBDIVISION ON MODELING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES WITH SWAT 1 , 2006 .

[45]  Scott L. Powell,et al.  Bringing an ecological view of change to Landsat‐based remote sensing , 2014 .

[46]  G. S. Dwarakish,et al.  A Review on Hydrological Models , 2015 .

[47]  W. Cohen,et al.  Comparison of Tasseled Cap-based Landsat data structures for use in forest disturbance detection , 2005 .

[48]  Robert E. Wolfe,et al.  An Algorithm to Produce Temporally and Spatially Continuous MODIS-LAI Time Series , 2008, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[49]  Woonsup Choi,et al.  Assessing hydrological impact of potential land use change through hydrological and land use change modeling for the Kishwaukee River basin (USA). , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[50]  Yongping Yuan,et al.  Assessing impacts of Landuse and Landcover changes on hydrology for the upper San Pedro watershed , 2011 .

[51]  T. Brown,et al.  Spatial Distribution of Water Supply in the Coterminous United States 1 , 2008 .

[52]  Rebecca Logsdon Muenich,et al.  Comparing two tools for ecosystem service assessments regarding water resources decisions. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[53]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  A GIS‐Coupled Hydrological Model System for the Watershed Assessment of Agricultural Nonpoint and Point Sources of Pollution , 2004, Trans. GIS.