A Framework for Analyzing and Measuring Usage and Engagement Data (AMUsED) in Digital Interventions: Viewpoint

Trials of digital interventions can yield extensive, in-depth usage data, yet usage analyses tend to focus on broad descriptive summaries of how an intervention has been used by the whole sample. This paper proposes a novel framework to guide systematic, fine-grained usage analyses that better enables understanding of how an intervention works, when, and for whom. The framework comprises three stages to assist in the following: (1) familiarization with the intervention and its relationship to the captured data, (2) identification of meaningful measures of usage and specifying research questions to guide systematic analyses of usage data, and (3) preparation of datasheets and consideration of available analytical methods with which to examine the data. The framework can be applied to inform data capture during the development of a digital intervention and/or in the analysis of data after the completion of an evaluation trial. We will demonstrate how the framework shaped preparation and aided efficient data capture for a digital intervention to lower transmission of cold and flu viruses in the home, as well as how it informed a systematic, in-depth analysis of usage data collected from a separate digital intervention designed to promote self-management of colds and flu. The Analyzing and Measuring Usage and Engagement Data (AMUsED) framework guides systematic and efficient in-depth usage analyses that will support standardized reporting with transparent and replicable findings. These detailed findings may also enable examination of what constitutes effective engagement with particular interventions.

[1]  K. Wallston,et al.  The Validity of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scales , 2005, Journal of health psychology.

[2]  F. Mair,et al.  Intervention planning for a digital intervention for self-management of hypertension: a theory-, evidence- and person-based approach , 2017, Implementation Science.

[3]  J. Wyatt,et al.  Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  Brian G Danaher,et al.  Defining Participant Exposure Measures in Web-Based Health Behavior Change Programs , 2006, Journal of medical Internet research.

[5]  M. Johnston,et al.  From Theory to Intervention: Mapping Theoretically Derived Behavioural Determinants to Behaviour Change Techniques , 2008 .

[6]  L. Yardley,et al.  Measuring barriers to adherence: validation of the problematic experiences of therapy scale , 2014, Disability and rehabilitation.

[7]  J. Raftery,et al.  An internet-delivered handwashing intervention to modify influenza-like illness and respiratory infection transmission (PRIMIT): a primary care randomised trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[8]  Howard Leventhal,et al.  The common-sense model of self-regulation of health and illness. , 2003 .

[9]  C. Abraham,et al.  The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions , 2013, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[10]  A. Baum,et al.  Assessment of Preferences for self-treatment and information in health care. , 1980, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[12]  Seth Wolpin,et al.  Validation and testing of the Acceptability E-scale for web-based patient-reported outcomes in cancer care. , 2011, Applied nursing research : ANR.

[13]  H. Christensen,et al.  e-CBT (myCompass), Antidepressant Medication, and Face-to-Face Psychological Treatment for Depression in Australia: A Cost-Effectiveness Comparison , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[14]  S. Murphy,et al.  The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): new methods for more potent eHealth interventions. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[15]  G. Eysenbach The Law of Attrition , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[16]  L. Yardley,et al.  Using an Analysis of Behavior Change to Inform Effective Digital Intervention Design: How Did the PRIMIT Website Change Hand Hygiene Behavior Across 8993 Users? , 2016, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[17]  J. Richardus,et al.  Title Perceived Threat , Risk Perception , and Efficacy Beliefs Related to SARS and Other ( Emerging ) Infectious Diseases : Results of an International Survey , 2009 .

[18]  Amy Przeworski,et al.  A review of technology-assisted self-help and minimal contact therapies for drug and alcohol abuse and smoking addiction: is human contact necessary for therapeutic efficacy? , 2011, Clinical psychology review.

[19]  T. Kowatsch,et al.  Engagement Within a Mobile Phone–Based Smoking Cessation Intervention for Adolescents and its Association With Participant Characteristics and Outcomes , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[20]  Lyndsay A. Nelson,et al.  Patterns of User Engagement with Mobile- and Web-Delivered Self-Care Interventions for Adults with T2DM: A Review of the Literature , 2016, Current Diabetes Reports.

[21]  L. Yardley,et al.  The Person-Based Approach to Intervention Development: Application to Digital Health-Related Behavior Change Interventions , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[22]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Health Behavior Change: Moving from Observation to Intervention. , 2017, Annual review of psychology.

[23]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[24]  Emily Gerth-Guyette,et al.  Impact of mHealth Chronic Disease Management on Treatment Adherence and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[25]  Keith Petrie,et al.  The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) , 2002 .

[26]  Cecily Morrison,et al.  Analyzing Engagement in a Web-Based Intervention Platform Through Visualizing Log-Data , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[27]  Floor Sieverink,et al.  Clarifying the Concept of Adherence to eHealth Technology: Systematic Review on When Usage Becomes Adherence , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[28]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  From Theory-Inspired to Theory-Based Interventions: A Protocol for Developing and Testing a Methodology for Linking Behaviour Change Techniques to Theoretical Mechanisms of Action , 2017, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[29]  S. Michie,et al.  Using the Internet to Promote Health Behavior Change: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Impact of Theoretical Basis, Use of Behavior Change Techniques, and Mode of Delivery on Efficacy , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[30]  Floor Sieverink,et al.  Opening the Black Box of Electronic Health: Collecting, Analyzing, and Interpreting Log Data , 2017, JMIR research protocols.

[31]  C. Humby,et al.  Process Mining: Data science in Action , 2014 .

[32]  Parisa Rashidi,et al.  The Behavioral Intervention Technology Model: An Integrated Conceptual and Technological Framework for eHealth and mHealth Interventions , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[33]  Lucy Yardley,et al.  Developing and Evaluating Digital Interventions to Promote Behavior Change in Health and Health Care: Recommendations Resulting From an International Workshop , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[34]  H. Raat,et al.  Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of eHealth Interventions in Somatic Diseases: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[35]  Quazi Abidur Rahman,et al.  Patterns of User Engagement With the Mobile App, Manage My Pain: Results of a Data Mining Investigation , 2017, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[36]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Understanding and Promoting Effective Engagement With Digital Behavior Change Interventions. , 2016, American journal of preventive medicine.

[37]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis , 2016, Translational behavioral medicine.

[38]  D. Heaney,et al.  A comparison of a Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as an outcome measure of primary care consultations. , 1998, Family practice.

[39]  Catherine Georgina Russell,et al.  Assessing User Engagement of an mHealth Intervention: Development and Implementation of the Growing Healthy App Engagement Index , 2017, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[40]  A. O’Cathain,et al.  Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[41]  M. Weal,et al.  Comparing usage of a web and app stress management intervention: An observational study , 2018, Internet interventions.

[42]  M. Weal,et al.  Introduction to LifeGuide: Open-source Software for Creating Online Interventions for Health Care, Health Promotion and Training. , 2010 .

[43]  Lucy Yardley,et al.  A Visualization Tool to Analyse Usage of Web-Based Interventions: The Example of Positive Online Weight Reduction (POWeR) , 2015, JMIR human factors.

[44]  L. Yardley,et al.  Primary care randomised controlled trial of a tailored interactive website for the self-management of respiratory infections (Internet Doctor) , 2016, BMJ Open.

[45]  G. Eysenbach CONSORT-EHEALTH: Improving and Standardizing Evaluation Reports of Web-based and Mobile Health Interventions , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.