Understanding the design variables that contribute to the response of a prosthetic foot: Part I — Rig design

In this paper the design of a rig capable to simulate the dynamic response of an energy storing and returning composite prosthetic foot during amputee running is considered. It has been assumed that the amputee/prosthesis system can be modelled as a spring/mass system. Therefore the rig has been designed to allow the applied mass, input force and foot contact point of various feet designs to be varied to test this assumption. The rig will allow the design variables that contribute to the response of a prosthetic foot during running to be understood and optimised to improve the foot's performance.

[1]  Peter G Weyand,et al.  Foot speed, foot-strike and footwear: linking gait mechanics and running ground reaction forces , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[2]  Siamak Noroozi,et al.  Performance enhancement of bi-lateral lower-limb amputees in the latter phases of running events: an initial investigation , 2013 .

[3]  Siamak Noroozi,et al.  Modal analysis of composite prosthetic energy-storing-and-returning feet: an initial investigation , 2013 .

[4]  A A Zadpoor,et al.  Mass–spring–damper modelling of the human body to study running and hopping – an overview , 2011, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[5]  Quoc Hung Ly,et al.  Towards a footwear design tool: influence of shoe midsole properties and ground stiffness on the impact force during running. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Tao Liu,et al.  Development of a wearable sensor system for quantitative gait analysis , 2009 .

[7]  Magnus Lilja,et al.  Lower extremity leg amputation: An advantage in running? , 2008 .

[8]  Reinhard Blickhan,et al.  A movement criterion for running. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  B. Nigg,et al.  A mechanical model to determine the influence of masses and mass distribution on the impact force during running. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  B. Nigg,et al.  The effect of muscle stiffness and damping on simulated impact force peaks during running. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  S. Hasan,et al.  Relationship between vertical ground reaction force and speed during walking, slow jogging, and running. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[12]  R. Blickhan,et al.  Similarity in multilegged locomotion: Bouncing like a monopode , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[13]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of energy storing prosthetic feet: Flex Foot and Seattle Foot Versus Standard SACH foot. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet: Seattle Ankle/Lite Foot versus SACH foot. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  R. Alexander,et al.  A model of bipedal locomotion on compliant legs. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[16]  C. T. Farley,et al.  Hopping frequency in humans: a test of how springs set stride frequency in bouncing gaits. , 1991, Journal of applied physiology.

[17]  T. McGeer,et al.  Passive bipedal running , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.

[18]  John Michael,et al.  Energy Storing Feet : A Clinical Comparison by , 2009 .

[19]  T. McMahon,et al.  The mechanics of running: how does stiffness couple with speed? , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  R. Blickhan The spring-mass model for running and hopping. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  D. I. Miller,et al.  Ground reaction forces in running: a reexamination. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.