Aspects of root infinitives

Abstract This paper discusses the phenomenon of root infinitives (RIs) in child language, focussing on a distributional restriction on the verbs that occur in this construction, viz. event-denoting verbs, as well as on a related aspect of interpretation, viz. that RIs receive modal interpretations. The modality of the construction is traced to the infinitival morphology, while the eventivity restriction is derived from the modal meaning. In contrast, the English bare form, which is often taken to instantiate the RI-phenomenon, does not seem to be subject to the eventivity constraint, nor do we find a modal reference effect. This confirms the analysis, which traces these to the infinitival morphology itself, which is absent in English. The approach not only provides a precise characterization of the distribution of the RI-phenomenon within and across languages; it also explains differences between the English bare form phenomenon and the RI-construction in languages with genuine infinitives by reference to the morphosyntax of the languages involved. The fact that children appear to be sensitive to these distinctions in the target systems at such an early age supports the general thesis of Early Morphosyntactic Convergence, which the authors argue is a pervasive property of the acquisition process.

[1]  G. Haan,et al.  Missing subjects and objects in child grammar , 1988 .

[2]  B. D. Schwartz,et al.  Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar , 1994 .

[3]  Monika Rothweiler Spracherwerb und Grammatik , 1990 .

[4]  F. Antinucci,et al.  How children talk about what happened , 1976, Journal of Child Language.

[5]  J.K.S. van Ginneken De roman van een kleuter , 2022 .

[6]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  Underspecification and Lexical Learning in early child grammars , 1994 .

[7]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Some Notes on Linguistic Theory and Language Development: The Case of Root Infinitives , 1993 .

[8]  C. Foley,et al.  The development of functional categories : The acquisition of the subject in French , 1998 .

[9]  Jan-Wouter Zwart,et al.  Dutch syntax: A minimalist approach , 1993 .

[10]  Andrew Radford,et al.  Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax: The Nature of Early Child Grammars of English , 1990 .

[11]  Mürvet Enç Anchoring conditions for tense , 1987 .

[12]  H. Sinclair,et al.  Time, tense and aspect , 1973 .

[13]  Jürgen M. Meisel Two first languages : early grammatical development in bilingual children , 1990 .

[14]  Höskuldur Thráinsson,et al.  Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English , 1989, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.

[15]  R. Cann TIME, TENSE AND ASPECT , 1993 .

[16]  Paola Crisma,et al.  "On the Acquisition of WH-Questions in French" , 1992 .

[17]  M. Penke,et al.  The Acquisition of Agreement Morphology and its Syntactic Consequences: New Evidence on German Child Language from the Simone-Corpus , 1992 .

[18]  M. Guasti Verb Syntax in Italian Child Grammar: Finite and Nonfinite Verbs , 1993 .

[19]  J. Weissenborn Functional Categories and Verb Movement: The Acquisition of German Syntax Reconsidered , 1990 .

[20]  L. Haegeman Root Infinitives, Tense, and Truncated Structures in Dutch , 1995 .

[21]  P. Jordens The acquisition of verb placement in Dutch and German , 1990 .

[22]  K R Wagner,et al.  How much do children say in a day? , 1985, Journal of Child Language.

[23]  Jürgen M. Meisel,et al.  The Acquisition of verb placement : functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition , 1996 .

[24]  Nina Hyams,et al.  Missing heads in child language , 1996 .

[25]  N. Dittmar,et al.  Modality in language acquisition , 1993 .

[26]  L. Bloom,et al.  Semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflection in child language , 1980 .

[27]  Hans den Besten,et al.  On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules , 1983 .

[28]  Margaret Thomas,et al.  Generative perspectives on language acquisition (review) , 1999 .

[29]  Roy D. Pea World-Making and World-Revealing: Semantics and Pragmatics of Modal Auxiliary Verbs during the Third Year of Life. , 1982 .

[30]  David Lebeaux,et al.  Language acquisition and the form of the grammar , 2000 .

[31]  A. E. Pierce,et al.  Language Acquisition and Syntactic Theory: A Comparative Analysis of French and English Child Grammars , 1992 .

[32]  D. Poeppel,et al.  The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German , 1993 .

[33]  Jürgen Weissenborn,et al.  Routes to Verb Placement in Early German and French: The Independence of Finiteness and Agreement , 1992 .

[34]  K. Wexler,et al.  The Optional-Infinitive Stage in Child English: Evidence from Negation , 1996 .

[35]  L.C.J. Barbiers The syntax of interpretation , 1995 .

[36]  Fabio Pianesi,et al.  Tense and Aspect: From Semantics to Morphosyntax , 1997 .

[37]  C. Platzack Functional Categories and Early Swedish , 1992 .

[38]  C Snow,et al.  Child language data exchange system , 1984, Journal of Child Language.

[39]  J. Zwart The Minimalist Program , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[40]  Yasuhiro Shirai,et al.  The Acquisition of Tense-Aspect Morphology: A Prototype Account. , 1995 .

[41]  D. Ingram,et al.  Early syntactic acquisition in German: Evidence for the modal hypothesis , 1996 .

[42]  Jean-Yves Pollock Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP , 1989 .

[43]  M. C. Caselli,et al.  The acquisition of Italian morphology: implications for models of language development , 1992, Journal of Child Language.

[44]  Nina Hyams,et al.  The Underspecification of Functional Categories in Early Grammar , 1996 .