Diagnosis of fatty infiltration of the liver on contrast enhanced CT: limitations of liver-minus-spleen attenuation difference measurements

AbstractBackground: We investigated whether liver-minus-spleen (L-S) attenuation differences can accurately diagnose fatty infiltration of the liver on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). Methods: A group of 78 patients administered a fast injection (90-s duration) of 150 mL 60% ionic contrast was compared with 81 patients given a slow injection (152.5 s). The presence or absence of fatty infiltration of the liver was diagnosed by noncontrast CT. Results: The L-S attenuation differences varied significantly, depending on both injection rate and timing of measurements. For the fast-injection group, the optimal L-S threshold for diagnosing fatty infiltration ranged from −43 to −33 Hounsfield units (HU) for early (79 s) and late measurements (106 s), respectively. For the slow-injection group, the optimal threshold ranged from −31 to −25 HU (80 and 112 s, respectively). In addition, sensitivity was not very high (range = 0.54–0.71) for either injection protocol at any measurement time because of significant overlap of L-S values between normal and fatty infiltration patients. Moderate and severe fatty infiltration were more reliably diagnosed than mild fatty infiltration by this method. Conclusions: Contrast injection rate and timing of measurements significantly influence the optimal L-S threshold for diagnosing fatty liver. This limits the clinical usefulness of such measurements.

[1]  M Kormano,et al.  Dynamic contrast enhancement of the upper abdomen: effect of contrast medium and body weight. , 1983, Investigative radiology.

[2]  T. Chambers,et al.  Hepatic CT enhancement: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents in the same patients. , 1994, Radiology.

[3]  S. Saji,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of fatty liver by computed tomography in rabbits. , 1984, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  L. Berland,et al.  Comparison of contrast media injection rates and volumes for hepatic dynamic incremented computed tomography. , 1988, Investigative radiology.

[5]  T. Chambers,et al.  Hepatic CT enhancement. Part I. Alterations in the volume of contrast material within the same patients. , 1994, Radiology.

[6]  M. Bernardino,et al.  The Fatty Liver: Pitfalls in the CT and Angiographic Evaluation of Metastatic Disease , 1983, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  E. Keeler,et al.  Primer on certain elements of medical decision making. , 1975, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  F. Burgener,et al.  Contrast enhancement in abdominal CT: bolus vs. infusion. , 1981, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  T. Chambers,et al.  Hepatic CT enhancement. Part II. Alterations in contrast material volume and rate of injection within the same patients. , 1994, Radiology.

[10]  R C Nelson,et al.  Hepatic dynamic sequential CT: section enhancement profiles with a bolus of ionic and nonionic contrast agents. , 1991, Radiology.

[11]  J. McGahan,et al.  Spectrum of CT and sonographic appearance of fatty infiltration of the liver. , 1993, Clinical imaging.

[12]  H Y Kressel,et al.  The relation of liver fat to computed tomography numbers: a preliminary experimental study in rabbits. , 1979, Radiology.

[13]  O. Matsui,et al.  Focal sparing of segment IV in fatty livers shown by sonography and CT: correlation with aberrant gastric venous drainage. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  K. Okuda,et al.  Obesity-related nonalcoholic fatty liver: CT features and follow-up studies after low-calorie diet. , 1987, Radiology.

[15]  S S Sagel,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: comparison of contrast medium injection rates and uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols. , 1993, Radiology.

[16]  P. Dean,et al.  Hepatic CT contrast enhancement: effect of dose, duration of infusion, and time elapsed following infusion. , 1980, Investigative radiology.

[17]  S. Kollins Computed tomography of the liver, spleen, and pancreas. , 1978, Seminars in roentgenology.

[18]  W A Kalender,et al.  Bolus geometry and dynamics after intravenous contrast medium injection. , 1984, Radiology.

[19]  J. Peterson,et al.  Contrast-enhanced CT of the liver and spleen: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents. , 1989, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  D. Cosgrove,et al.  Focal sparing in fatty infiltration of the liver. , 1986, The British journal of radiology.

[21]  L Axel,et al.  Difference between liver and spleen CT numbers in the normal adult: its usefulness in predicting the presence of diffuse liver disease. , 1980, Radiology.

[22]  G. Bydder,et al.  Computed tomography attenuation values in fatty liver. , 1981, The Journal of computed tomography.

[23]  P. Sheedy,et al.  Computed tomography of the liver. , 1977, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  A. Rimm,et al.  Focal hepatic masses and fatty infiltration detected by enhanced dynamic CT. , 1986, Radiology.