Evaluation of whole‐body MR to CT deformable image registration

Multimodality image registration plays a crucial role in various clinical and research applications. The aim of this study is to present an optimized MR to CT whole‐body deformable image registration algorithm and its validation using clinical studies. A 3D intermodality registration technique based on B‐spline transformation was performed using optimized parameters of the elastix package based on the Insight Toolkit (ITK) framework. Twenty‐eight (17 male and 11 female) clinical studies were used in this work. The registration was evaluated using anatomical landmarks and segmented organs. In addition to 16 anatomical landmarks, three key organs (brain, lungs, and kidneys) and the entire body volume were segmented for evaluation. Several parameters — such as the Euclidean distance between anatomical landmarks, target overlap, Dice and Jaccard coefficients, false positives and false negatives, volume similarity, distance error, and Hausdorff distance — were calculated to quantify the quality of the registration algorithm. Dice coefficients for the majority of patients (>75%) were in the 0.8–1 range for the whole body, brain, and lungs, which satisfies the criteria to achieve excellent alignment. On the other hand, for kidneys, Dice coefficients for volumes of 25% of the patients meet excellent volume agreement requirement, while the majority of patients satisfy good agreement criteria (>0.6). For all patients, the distance error was in 0–10 mm range for all segmented organs. In summary, we optimized and evaluated the accuracy of an MR to CT deformable registration algorithm. The registered images constitute a useful 3D whole‐body MR‐CT atlas suitable for the development and evaluation of novel MR‐guided attenuation correction procedures on hybrid PET‐MR systems. PACS number: 07.05.Pj

[1]  A. Drzezga,et al.  First Clinical Experience with Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR: Comparison to PET/CT in Patients with Oncologic Diagnoses , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  B. Marinček,et al.  18F-FDG-PET und MRT bei Patienten mit malignen Leber- und Pankreasläsionen – Genauigkeit der retrospektiven PET/MRI-Registrierung durch Verwendung der CT-Komponente der PET/CT , 2010 .

[3]  Michael J Ackerman,et al.  Engineering and algorithm design for an image processing Api: a technical report on ITK--the Insight Toolkit. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[4]  A Boxwala,et al.  Core-based portal image registration for automatic radiotherapy treatment verification. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  W. Heiss,et al.  The potential of PET/MR for brain imaging , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[6]  E. Squillaci,et al.  Role of combined DWIBS/3D-CE-T1w whole-body MRI in tumor staging: Comparison with PET-CT. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[7]  Patrick Clarysse,et al.  Spatiotemporal motion estimation for respiratory-correlated imaging of the lungs. , 2010, Medical physics.

[8]  T. Yen,et al.  PET/CT and 3-T whole-body MRI in the detection of malignancy in treated oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[9]  Wei Lu,et al.  Tracking lung tissue motion and expansion/compression with inverse consistent image registration and spirometry. , 2007, Medical physics.

[10]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  B. Everitt,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[12]  J. Nuyts,et al.  Non-rigid registration with position dependent rigidity for whole body PET follow-up studies , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[13]  T van Walsum,et al.  Evaluation of a multi-atlas based method for segmentation of cardiac CTA data: a large-scale, multicenter, and multivendor study. , 2010, Medical physics.

[14]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  elastix: A Toolbox for Intensity-Based Medical Image Registration , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  A. Alavi,et al.  The Clinical Role of Fusion Imaging Using PET, CT, and MR Imaging. , 2008, PET clinics.

[16]  Xiaofeng Yang,et al.  MR∕PET quantification tools: registration, segmentation, classification, and MR-based attenuation correction. , 2012, Medical physics.

[17]  Ilja Bezrukov,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for Whole-Body PET/MRI: Quantitative Evaluation of Segmentation- and Atlas-Based Methods , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  A Siegel,et al.  Does performing image registration and subtraction in ictal brain SPECT help localize neocortical seizures? , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[20]  Indrin J Chetty,et al.  Analysis of deformable image registration accuracy using computational modeling. , 2010, Medical physics.

[21]  P. Jaccard THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE FLORA IN THE ALPINE ZONE.1 , 1912 .

[22]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI: A Novel Approach Combining Pattern Recognition and Atlas Registration , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  Josien P. W. Pluim,et al.  Evaluation of Optimization Methods for Nonrigid Medical Image Registration Using Mutual Information and B-Splines , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[24]  W. Conover Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions , 1974 .

[25]  Wolfgang Birkfellner,et al.  Registration of DRRs and portal images for verification of stereotactic body radiotherapy: a feasibility study in lung cancer treatment. , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Nonlinear elastic registration of brain images with tumor pathology using a biomechanical model [MRI] , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  Maximilien Vermandel,et al.  Automatic segmentation of pelvic structures from magnetic resonance images for prostate cancer radiotherapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  Alan Y Chiang,et al.  Book Review: Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 3rd edition , 2005 .

[29]  Ursula Nestle,et al.  Nonrigid Versus Rigid Registration of Thoracic 18F-FDG PET and CT in Patients with Lung Cancer: An Intraindividual Comparison of Different Breathing Maneuvers , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  C. Whyne,et al.  Quantitative characterization of metastatic disease in the spine. Part I. Semiautomated segmentation using atlas-based deformable registration and the level set method. , 2007, Medical physics.

[31]  Gerald Antoch,et al.  Combined PET/MRI: a new dimension in whole-body oncology imaging? , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[32]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[33]  Guido Gerig,et al.  User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[34]  Oscar Camara,et al.  Generalized Overlap Measures for Evaluation and Validation in Medical Image Analysis , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[35]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Automated analysis of small animal PET studies through deformable registration to an atlas , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[36]  Eduard Schreibmann,et al.  MR-based attenuation correction for hybrid PET-MR brain imaging systems using deformable image registration. , 2010, Medical physics.

[37]  C Wu,et al.  Femur statistical atlas construction based on two-level 3D non-rigid registration , 2009, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[38]  Benoît Macq,et al.  Comparison of 12 deformable registration strategies in adaptive radiation therapy for the treatment of head and neck tumors. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[39]  Arno Klein,et al.  Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[40]  V.R.S Mani,et al.  Survey of Medical Image Registration , 2013 .

[41]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Morphometric analysis of white matter lesions in MR images: method and validation , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[42]  Umut Koçak,et al.  Simultaneous surface registration of ictal and interictal SPECT and magnetic resonance images for epilepsy studies , 2006, Nuclear medicine communications.

[43]  G. V. von Schulthess,et al.  18F-FDG-PET and MRI in patients with malignancies of the liver and pancreas , 2010, Nuklearmedizin.

[44]  Wolfgang A Tomé,et al.  The utilization of consistency metrics for error analysis in deformable image registration , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[45]  Joshua D. Lawson,et al.  Evaluation of automatic atlas-based lymph node segmentation for head-and-neck cancer. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[46]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Evaluation of Registration Methods on Thoracic CT: The EMPIRE10 Challenge , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[47]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Design and performance evaluation of a whole-body Ingenuity TF PET–MRI system , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[48]  Josien P. W. Pluim,et al.  Semi-automatic Reference Standard Construction for Quantitative Evaluation of Lung CT Registration , 2008, MICCAI.

[49]  Joe Y. Chang,et al.  Validation of an accelerated ‘demons’ algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[50]  H. Zaidi,et al.  An outlook on future design of hybrid PET/MRI systems. , 2011, Medical physics.

[51]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Computed tomography calcium score scan for attenuation correction of N-13 ammonia cardiac positron emission tomography: effect of respiratory phase and registration method , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[52]  J. Timonen,et al.  Monitoring bone growth using quantitative ultrasound in comparison with DXA and pQCT. , 2008, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.