Transfer Learning for a Multimodal Hybrid EEG-fTCD Brain–Computer Interface

Humans can transfer knowledge previously acquired from a specific task to new and unknown ones. Recently, transfer learning (TL) has been extensively used in brain–computer interface (BCI) research to reduce the training/calibration requirements. BCI systems have been designed to provide alternative communication or control access through computers to individuals with limited speech and physical abilities (LSPA). These systems generally require a calibration session in order to train the BCI before each usage. Such a calibration session may be burdensome for the individuals with LSPA. In this article, we introduce a multimodal hybrid BCI based on electroencephalography (EEG) and functional transcranial Doppler ultrasound (fTCD) and present a TL approach to reduce the calibration requirements. In the hybrid BCI, EEG, and fTCD are used simultaneously to measure the electrical brain activity and cerebral blood velocity, respectively, in response to motor imagery (MI) tasks. Using the data we collected from ten healthy individuals, we perform dimensionality reduction utilizing regularized discriminant analysis (RDA). Using the scores from RDA, we learn class conditional probabilistic distributions for each individual. We use these class conditional distributions to perform TL across different participants. More specifically, in order to reduce the calibration requirements for each individual, we choose the recorded data from other individuals to augment the training data for that specific individual. We choose the data for augmentation based on the probabilistic similarities between the class conditional distributions. For the final classification, we use the RDA scores after TL as features input to three different classifiers: quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and support vector machines (SVMs). Using our experimental data, we show that TL decreases the calibration requirements up to $87.5\%$. Also by comparing SVM, LDA, and QDA, we observe that the SVM provides the best classification performance.

[1]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  High-speed spelling with a noninvasive brain–computer interface , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Guy Vingerhoets,et al.  Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography Monitoring of Cerebral Hemodynamics During Performance of Cognitive Tasks: A Review , 2000, Neuropsychology Review.

[3]  Gernot R. Müller-Putz,et al.  Control of an Electrical Prosthesis With an SSVEP-Based BCI , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Gary Garcia High frequency SSVEPs for BCI applications , 2007 .

[5]  G. Prasad,et al.  Applying a brain-computer interface to support motor imagery practice in people with stroke for upper limb recovery: a feasibility study , 2010, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[6]  Tom Chau,et al.  A Brain-Computer Interface Based on Bilateral Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound , 2011, PloS one.

[7]  Amit Konar,et al.  Performance analysis of LDA, QDA and KNN algorithms in left-right limb movement classification from EEG data , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Systems in Medicine and Biology.

[8]  Murat Akcakaya,et al.  A brain-computer interface based on functional transcranial doppler ultrasound using wavelet transform and support vector machines , 2018, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[9]  G A Clark,et al.  Restoring motor control and sensory feedback in people with upper extremity amputations using arrays of 96 microelectrodes implanted in the median and ulnar nerves , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[10]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  A Large Clinical Study on the Ability of Stroke Patients to Use an EEG-Based Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface , 2011, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[11]  Keum-Shik Hong,et al.  fNIRS-based brain-computer interfaces: a review , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[12]  Qiang Yang,et al.  A Survey on Transfer Learning , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[13]  Yogendra Kumar Jain,et al.  Min Max Normalization Based Data Perturbation Method for Privacy Protection , 2011 .

[14]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  A feasibility study on SSVEP-based interaction with motivating and immersive virtual and augmented reality , 2017, ArXiv.

[15]  P. Welch The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms , 1967 .

[16]  Annabelle Blangero,et al.  Exploiting individual primary visual cortex geometry to boost steady state visual evoked potentials , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[17]  Yuanqing Li,et al.  Control of a Wheelchair in an Indoor Environment Based on a Brain–Computer Interface and Automated Navigation , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[18]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  T RANSFER OF LEARNING , 1992 .

[19]  L. Thompson,et al.  Knowledge Transfer , 2015 .

[20]  M. Diamond,et al.  Primary Motor and Sensory Cortex Activation during Motor Performance and Motor Imagery: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Clinical study of neurorehabilitation in stroke using EEG-based motor imagery brain-computer interface with robotic feedback , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[22]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines , 2002, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[23]  L. Parsons,et al.  Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET , 1995, Nature.

[24]  Agnes Flöel,et al.  Determining the hemispheric dominance of spatial attention: A comparison between fTCD and fMRI , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[25]  M. Jeannerod Mental imagery in the motor context , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  J. Friedman Regularized Discriminant Analysis , 1989 .

[27]  M. Peters,et al.  Applications of mental rotation figures of the Shepard and Metzler type and description of a mental rotation stimulus library , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[28]  Febo Cincotti,et al.  Towards Noninvasive Hybrid Brain–Computer Interfaces: Framework, Practice, Clinical Application, and Beyond , 2015, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[29]  Murat Akcakaya,et al.  An EEG and fTCD based BCI for control , 2016, 2016 50th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[30]  David Eichmann,et al.  Knowledge transfer: what, how, and why , 2013 .

[31]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Motor imagery activates primary sensorimotor area in humans , 1997, Neuroscience Letters.

[32]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  To transfer or not to transfer , 2005, NIPS 2005.

[33]  Gert Pfurtscheller,et al.  Characterization of four-class motor imagery EEG data for the BCI-competition 2005 , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[34]  Masahiro Suzuki,et al.  Transfer learning based on the observation probability of each attribute , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[35]  Xingyu Wang,et al.  A new hybrid BCI paradigm based on P300 and SSVEP , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[36]  D F Hanley,et al.  Validation of transcranial Doppler ultrasound with a stereotactic neurosurgical technique. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.

[37]  Emilio Soria Olivas,et al.  Handbook of Research on Machine Learning Applications and Trends : Algorithms , Methods , and Techniques , 2009 .

[38]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Enhanced Performance by a Hybrid Nirs–eeg Brain Computer Interface , 2022 .

[39]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Learning From More Than One Data Source: Data Fusion Techniques for Sensorimotor Rhythm-Based Brain–Computer Interfaces , 2015, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[40]  Murat Akcakaya,et al.  Towards optimal visual presentation design for hybrid EEG-fTCD brain-computer interfaces. , 2018, Journal of neural engineering.

[41]  Yijun Wang,et al.  Enhancing Detection of SSVEPs for a High-Speed Brain Speller Using Task-Related Component Analysis , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  Reza Fazel-Rezai,et al.  A Review of Hybrid Brain-Computer Interface Systems , 2013, Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[43]  Sung-Hyuk Cha Comprehensive Survey on Distance/Similarity Measures between Probability Density Functions , 2007 .

[44]  Wei Wu,et al.  Frequency recognition based on canonical correlation analysis for SSVEP-based BCIs , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[45]  J. del R. Millán,et al.  Multimodal Fusion of Muscle and Brain Signals for a Hybrid-BCI , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[46]  Chun-Yi Su,et al.  Brain–Machine Interface and Visual Compressive Sensing-Based Teleoperation Control of an Exoskeleton Robot , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[47]  Byoung-Kyong Min,et al.  Neuroimaging-based approaches in the brain-computer interface. , 2010, Trends in biotechnology.

[48]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  EEG-Based Strategies to Detect Motor Imagery for Control and Rehabilitation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.