Supporting the development of science inquiry skills with special classes of software

Computers have been used with science learners to teach facts, aid in information processing, facilitate problem solving, and stimulate conceptual change. The hallmark of science learning, however, is independent student inquiry. Although there is ample evidence that computers can support various aspects of students' inquiry activities, such as conducting virtual experiments and visualizing data, there has been limited discussion of how certain classes of software can facilitate learners' development, over time, from simple to sophisticated forms of inquiry. This theory-based article describes how data analysis tools, simulations, and modeling software, when used in the proper instructional contexts, provide young learners with rich intellectual environments for inquiry. Arguments from the research literature support claims that even the youngest elementary school learners have the capacity to engage in inquiry, and that special classes of software can stimulate these capacities and aid the transition from identifying basic patterns in data to conducting systematic experiments and constructing viable models of natural phenomena.

[1]  Ellen B. Mandinach.  The Cognitive Effects of Simulation-Modeling Software and Systems Thinking on Learning and Achievement. , 1988 .

[2]  Robert Glaser,et al.  Model–based analysis and reasoning in science: The MARS curriculum , 1995 .

[3]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Causal Models and Experimentation Strategies in Scientific Reasoning , 1991 .

[4]  E. Goldenberg.  Multiple representations: A vehicle for understanding understanding. , 1995 .

[5]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  Exploring Children's Data Modeling , 1996 .

[6]  G. Forman,et al.  Constructivism in the computer age , 1988 .

[7]  Robert H. Rivers,et al.  Computer simulations to stimulate scientific problem solving , 1987 .

[8]  Vitor Duarte Teodoro,et al.  A Model to Design Computer Exploratory Software for Science and Mathematics , 1993 .

[9]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains , 1998 .

[10]  Johan de Kleer,et al.  A Qualitative Physics Based on Confluences , 1984, Artif. Intell..

[11]  John R. Jungck,et al.  Strategic Simulations and Post-Socratic Pedagogy: Constructing Computer Software to Develop Long-Term Inference through Experimental Inquiry , 1985 .

[12]  H. Schecker.  Learning physics by making models , 1993 .

[13]  James J. Kaput,et al.  Creating Cybernetic and Psychological Ramps from the Concrete to the Abstract: Examples from Multiplicative Structures , 1997 .

[14]  G. Salomon,et al.  Skill may not be enough: The role of mindfulness in learning and transfer , 1987 .

[15]  D. Perkins,et al.  Partners in Cognition: Extending Human Intelligence with Intelligent Technologies , 1991 .

[16]  Robert Karplus,et al.  Teaching for the development of reasoning , 1980 .

[17]  Harvey Mellar,et al.  Educational tools for computational modelling , 1993 .

[18]  B. White.  ThinkerTools: Causal Models, Conceptual Change, and Science Education , 1993 .

[19]  Stephen M. Alessi,et al.  Fidelity in the design of instructional simulations , 1988 .

[20]  B. Inhelder,et al.  If you want to get ahead, get a theory , 1975, Cognition.

[21]  John D. Coley,et al.  Perspectives on language and thought: Language and categorization: The acquisition of natural kind terms , 1991 .

[22]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Computer-based microworlds: A bridge between constructivism and direct instruction , 1992 .

[23]  Valerie J. Shute,et al.  A Large-Scale Evaluation of an Intelligent Discovery World: Smithtown , 1990, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[24]  Annette Karmiloff-Smith,et al.  The Child is a Theoretician, Not an Inductivist* , 1988 .

[25]  David Klahr,et al.  Dual Space Search During Scientific Reasoning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[26]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Growth Of Logical Thinking From Childhood To Adolescence: An Essay On The Construction Of Formal Operational Structures , 1958 .

[27]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Explanation and Verbalization in a Computer-Assisted Search Task , 1987 .

[28]  Kathleen E. Metz.  Reassessment of Developmental Constraints on Children’s Science Instruction , 1995 .

[29]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .

[30]  B. Brehmer,et al.  Experiments with computer-simulated microworlds: Escaping both the narrow straits of the laboratory and the deep blue sea of the field study , 1993 .

[31]  Carol L. Smith,et al.  Constructing Understanding in the Science Classroom: Integrating Laboratory Experiments, Student and Computer Models, and Class Discussion in Learning Scientific Concepts , 1997 .

[32]  Harvey Mellar,et al.  Reasoning supported by computational tools , 1992 .

[33]  Jon Ogborn,et al.  Sixth form students' ability to engage in computational modelling , 1994 .

[34]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games , 1996 .

[35]  Richard A. Thurman.  Instructional simulation from a cognitive psychology viewpoint , 1993 .

[36]  E. Markman,et al.  Categories and induction in young children , 1986, Cognition.

[37]  T. Andre,et al.  Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: the roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs , 1996 .

[38]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[39]  L. Schauble,et al.  Students' transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation , 1991 .

[40]  R. Gagne.  Conditions of Learning , 1965 .

[41]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[42]  A. Gopnik.  How we know our minds: The illusion of first-person knowledge of intentionality , 1993, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[43]  Susan Carey,et al.  On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge , 1993 .

[44]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[45]  Ron Good,et al.  The nature and use of prediction skills in a biological computer simulation , 1988 .

[46]  A. Zohar.  Reasoning about Interactions between Variables , 1995 .

[47]  James J. Kaput,et al.  Authentic Inquiry With Data: Critical Barriers to Classroom Implementation , 1992 .

[48]  Dorothea P. Simon,et al.  Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Problems , 1980, Science.

[49]  L. Schauble,et al.  Cross-Domain Development of Scientific Reasoning , 1992 .

[50]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  The effect of computer simulations on introductory thermodynamics understanding , 1993 .

[51]  Joan Bliss,et al.  Tools for Exploratory Learning , 1989 .

[52]  William F. Brewer,et al.  The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction , 1993 .

[53]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A learner-centered tool for students building models , 1996, CACM.

[54]  S. Gilbert.  Model building and a definition of science , 1991 .

[55]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[56]  Leslie W. Trowbridge,et al.  Teaching Secondary School Science: Strategies for Developing Scientific Literacy , 1995 .