The Choice of Critical Information Systems Research

Accompanying the development and diffusion of information technologies throughout organizations and society is the research challenge to examine the relationship between information systems and the organizations and societies within which they are embedded. As the field of information systems matures, it is fitting that consideration be given to the ways in which such an examination is carried out. Thus, there is a research need not only to examine and assess the ways in which information systems are used and affect people; there is also a research need to examine and assess the research approaches that are used to carry out these assessments. This paper examines the enactment of the critical tradition in IS research and the possibilities for new insights that can arise from shifting the lens from positivist or interpretive to critical. This consideration leads to a discussion of issues that arise from the choice of critical IS research, followed by some recommendations for addressing these issues.

[1]  R. Boland,et al.  Accounting in organizations: A union of natural and rational perspectives , 1983 .

[2]  David Knights,et al.  Markets, Managers, and Messages: Managing Information Systems in Financial Services , 1997 .

[3]  Tone Bratteteig,et al.  User Participation and Democracy: A Discussion of Scandinavian Research on System Development , 1995, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Frank LandVisiting.  Escalation in Decision Making: The Tragedy of Taurus , 1997 .

[5]  P. Asaro.  Transforming society by transforming technology: the science and politics of participatory design , 2000 .

[6]  D. Morgan,et al.  Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[7]  S. Lukes.  Power: A Radical View , 1974 .

[8]  T. G.,et al.  Logic in Practice , 1934, Nature.

[9]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning , 1997, MIS Q..

[10]  V. Fournier,et al.  At the Critical Moment: Conditions and Prospects for Critical Management Studies , 2000 .

[11]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Odd girl out: an individual differences perspective on women in the IT profession , 2002, Inf. Technol. People.

[12]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Designing Human Systems For New Technology: The Ethics Method , 1983 .

[13]  John Mingers,et al.  Technical, Practical and Critical OR: Past, Present and Future? , 1992 .

[14]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems as rational discourse: an application of Habermas's theory of communicative action , 1988 .

[15]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Peter Hoonakker,et al.  Job characteristics and quality of working life in the IT workforce: the role of gender , 2003, SIGMIS CPR '03.

[17]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[18]  M. D. Myers,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems: A Reader , 2002 .

[19]  R. Bhaskar,et al.  The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences , 1979 .

[20]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Critical Management Studies , 1993 .

[21]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  The Application of Neohumanist Principles in Information Systems Development , 1993, Human, Organizational, and Social Dimensions of Information Systems Development.

[22]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[23]  Christopher Grey,et al.  Management Education , 1995 .

[24]  Debra Howcroft,et al.  Paradoxes of participatory practices: the Janus role of the systems developer , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[25]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Women in Ireland’s Information Industry: Voices from Inside , 2017 .

[26]  Guy Fitzgerald,et al.  Research methods in information systems , 1985 .

[27]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Understanding Computer-Mediated Discussions: Positivist and Interpretive Analyses of Group Support System Use , 2000, MIS Q..

[28]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Realizing Emancipatory Principles in Information Systems Development: The Case for ETHICS , 1994, MIS Q..

[29]  Helen J. Richardson.  CRM in Call Centres: The Logic of Practice , 2003, Information Systems Perspectives and Challenges in the Context of Globalization.

[30]  Ramiro Montealegre,et al.  Organizational Information Systems in the Context of Globalization , 2003, IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing.

[31]  Melanie Wilson,et al.  Making nursing visible? Gender, technology and the care plan as script , 2002, Inf. Technol. People.

[32]  Bill Doolin,et al.  To reveal is to critique: actor–network theory and critical information systems research , 2002, J. Inf. Technol..

[33]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Examining gender differences in IT professionals' perceptions of job stress in response to technological change , 2003, SIGMIS CPR '03.

[34]  Michael Newman,et al.  Some fallacies in information systems development , 1989 .

[35]  M. Foucault,et al.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. , 1978 .

[36]  Lynette Kvasny.  Problematizing the digital divide : cultural and social reproduction in a community technology initiative , 2002 .

[37]  Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic,et al.  Organisational change mediated by e-mail and Intranet: An ethnographic study , 1999, Inf. Technol. People.

[38]  E. Trauth.  Qualitative Research in IS: Issues and Trends , 2001 .

[39]  R. D'amico.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison , 1978, Telos.

[40]  J. Law.  A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination , 1991 .

[41]  Carole Brooke,et al.  Critical perspectives on information systems: an impression of the research landscape , 2002, J. Inf. Technol..

[42]  Gregory E. Truman,et al.  Gender Differences in the Information Systems Managerial Ranks: An Assessment of Potential Discriminatory Practices , 1994, MIS Q..

[43]  M. Alvesson,et al.  On the Idea of Emancipation in Management and Organization Studies , 1992 .

[44]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Research on information systems development in Scandinavia—unity in plurality , 1998 .

[45]  Brian Fay,et al.  Social Theory and Political Practice , 1975 .

[46]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Making Sense of Management: A Critical Introduction , 1997 .

[47]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[48]  John Mingers,et al.  What is it to be Critical? , 2000 .

[49]  Daniel Robey,et al.  An investigation of user-led system design: rational and political perspectives , 1984, CACM.

[50]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[51]  Robin Williams,et al.  Social Shaping of Technology: Frameworks, Findings and Implications for Policy, with Glossary of Social Shaping Concepts , 2002 .

[52]  Cynthia Mathis Beath,et al.  The Contradictory Structure of Systems Development Methodologies: Deconstructing the IS-User Relationship in Information Engineering , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[53]  C. Avgerou.  Information Systems and Global Diversity , 2002 .

[54]  Dale Littler,et al.  Information technology and organizations : strategies, networks, and integration , 1997 .

[55]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  The impact of gender on career success of information systems professionals: A human-capital perspective , 1997, Inf. Technol. People.

[56]  R. Hepburn,et al.  BEING AND TIME , 2010 .

[57]  Duane P. Truex.  Three Issues Concerning Relevance in IS Research: Epistemology, Audience, and Method , 2001, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[58]  P. Adler.  Critical in the Name of Whom and What? , 2002 .

[59]  Knut H. Sørensen,et al.  Shaping technology, guiding policy: concepts, spaces and tools , 2002 .

[60]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  Handbook of Science and Technology Studies , 1995 .

[61]  H. Richardson,et al.  CRM in Call Centres: The Logic of Practice , 2003, Information Systems Perspectives and Challenges in the Context of Globalization.

[62]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Four paradigms of information systems development , 1989, CACM.

[63]  D. Cecez-Kecmanovic.  Doing critical IS research: the question of methodology , 2001 .

[64]  John Law,et al.  Shaping technology building society: studies in socio-technical change , 1993 .

[65]  D. Edge,et al.  The social shaping of technology , 1988 .

[66]  BILL DOOLIN,et al.  Information technology as disciplinary technology: being critical in interpretive research on information systems , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[67]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Explaining the it gender gap: australian stories , 2000 .

[68]  Alison E. Adam,et al.  Feminist Philosophy and Information Systems , 2001, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[69]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Users and computers: A contextual approach to design of computer artifacts , 1996, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[70]  H. Klein,et al.  Information systems research: contemporary approaches and emergent traditions , 1991 .

[71]  Allen S. Lee.  Rigor and relevance in MIS research: beyond the approach of positivism alone , 1999 .

[72]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..

[73]  Melanie Wilson,et al.  Paradoxes of Participatory Design: the end-user perspective , 1999 .

[74]  Elzbieta Klecun,et al.  Telehealth and information society: a critical study of emerging concepts in policy and practice , 2002 .

[75]  J. Wajcman.  Feminism Confronts Technology , 1991 .

[76]  Graham Button,et al.  Published in: Technology in Working Order: Studies of Work, Interaction, and Technology, , 2022 .

[77]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  The Impact of Job Performance on Career Advancement Prospects: An Examination of Gender Difference in the IS Workplace , 1995, MIS Q..

[78]  M. Hammersley.  The politics of social research , 1995 .

[79]  J. Forester.  On Fieldwork in a Habermasian Way: Critical Ethnography and the Extra-ordinary Character of Ordinary Professional Work , 2003 .

[80]  M. Alvesson.  Doing critical management research , 2000 .

[81]  B. Latour.  Technology is Society Made Durable , 1990 .

[82]  W. Bijker.  Sociohistorical technology studies , 1994 .