Comprehending animations: Effects of spatial cueing versus temporal scaling

Abstract In the present experiment the animation of the operating mechanism of a pendulum clock was used in order to compare the effects of spatial cueing with those of temporal scaling on the comprehension of the animation. The presentation speed of the clock mechanism (normal vs. fast) and signalling cues to three different parts of the mechanism (weight, pendulum, and an irrelevant gear as blinking elements) were used in a 2 × 3 between subjects design with 144 participants. It was found that compared to normal speed condition, understanding was improved in the fast speed condition, but was unaffected by any of the cueing conditions. The results indicate that, although guidance of attention to relevant parts of an animation is often seen as a key to effective instructional design, the way temporal manipulations affect understanding is independent from local attention guiding.

[1]  Richard K. Lowe.  Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning , 1999 .

[2]  W. Stroebe,et al.  Beyond Vicary's fantasies: The impact of subliminal priming and brand choice , 2006 .

[3]  P. Juslin,et al.  Visual perception of dynamic properties: cue heuristics versus direct-perceptual competence. , 2000, Psychological review.

[4]  F. Paas,et al.  Attention Cueing as a Means to Enhance Learning from an Animation , 2007 .

[5]  D. Simons,et al.  Change Blindness in the Absence of a Visual Disruption , 2000, Perception.

[6]  Eric Jamet,et al.  Attention guiding in multimedia learning , 2008 .

[7]  Richard K. Lowe,et al.  An Eye Tracking Comparison of External Pointing Cues and Internal Continuous Cues in Learning with Complex Animations , 2010 .

[8]  F. Paas,et al.  Attention guidance in learning from a complex animation: Seeing is understanding? , 2010 .

[9]  C Carello,et al.  Static Depiction of Movement , 1986, Perception.

[10]  Z. Šidák.  ON MULTIVARIATE NORMAL PROBABILITIES OF RECTANGLES: THEIR DEPENDENCE ON CORRELATIONS' , 1968 .

[11]  J. Freyd.  Dynamic mental representations. , 1987, Psychological review.

[12]  Z. Šidák.  On Probabilities of Rectangles in Multivariate Student Distributions: Their Dependence on Correlations , 1971 .

[13]  D. Leutner,et al.  Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis , 2007 .

[14]  F. Pollick,et al.  Exaggerating Temporal Differences Enhances Recognition of Individuals from Point Light Displays , 2000, Psychological science.

[15]  James T. Enns,et al.  Unique Temporal Change Is the Key to Attentional Capture , 2005, Psychological science.

[16]  Jennifer J. Freyd,et al.  Five hunches about perceptual processes and dynamic representations , 1993 .

[17]  Richard K. Lowe,et al.  A unified view of learning from animated and static graphics , 2008 .

[18]  D. Hestenes,et al.  A mechanics baseline test , 1992 .

[19]  J. Gibson.  The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[20]  D. Purves,et al.  The wagon wheel illusion in movies and reality. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Gernot Horstmann,et al.  The time course of intended and unintended allocation of attention , 2006, Psychological research.

[22]  Hanne Pedersen,et al.  Learning with animation , 2011 .

[23]  P. Chandler,et al.  The Role of Visual Indicators in Dual Sensory Mode Instruction , 1997 .

[24]  K. Duncker,et al.  On problem-solving , 1945 .

[25]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction , 1999 .

[26]  Darren Newtson,et al.  Variation in behavior perception and ability attribution. , 1979 .

[27]  S. Schwan,et al.  The cognitive representation of filmic event summaries , 2004 .

[28]  Stephan Schwan,et al.  Effects of presentation speed of a dynamic visualization on the understanding of a mechanical system , 2008 .

[29]  D. Simons,et al.  Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures , 1997 .

[30]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[31]  S. Ainsworth,et al.  Multiple Forms of Dynamic Representation. , 2004 .

[32]  D. Scully,et al.  Observational learning in motor skill acquisition: A look at demonstrations , 1998 .

[33]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up influences on learning from animations , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[34]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[35]  J. Cutting.  Representing Motion in a Static Image: Constraints and Parallels in Art, Science, and Popular Culture , 2002, Perception.

[36]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Eye Movements and Problem Solving , 2003, Psychological science.

[37]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Animation: can it facilitate? , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[38]  John M Kennedy,et al.  Metaphor in Pictures , 1982, Perception.

[39]  J. Winawer,et al.  A Motion Aftereffect From Still Photographs Depicting Motion , 2008, Psychological science.