Sentence Coding: Tests of the Address-Contents Model and the Fragmentation-Conceptual Focus Hypothesis

Predictions of the address-contents model of sentence coding (Broadbent, 1971, 1973) were contrasted in two experiments with predictions based on the fragmentation hypothesis (Jones, 1974, 1976, 1978) and the conceptual focus hypothesis (Tannenbaum and Williams, 1968a, b). Participants attempted to recall lists of active-voice subject-verb-object sentences in response to a noun cue from each sentence. For persons instructed to image the sentences in Experiment I, there was a subject cuing superiority for verb partial recalls, but there were no reliable cuing asymmeties for complete sentence or noun partial recalls. For persons instructed to repeat the sentences aloud, the subject superiority for verb partial recalls did not appear. In Experiment II, there was overall a subject superiority for verb partial recall and symmetry for complete and noun partial recalls. This pattern was not affected by whether a question following each sentence required the subject or the object as response. These results support the fragmentation-conceptual focus hypothesis.

[1]  C. Perfetti,et al.  Discourse functions of thematization and topicalization , 1975 .

[2]  P. Thorndyke.  Conceptual complexity and imagery in comprehension and memory , 1975 .

[3]  R. Freedle.  Discourse production and comprehension , 1978 .

[4]  A C Graesser,et al.  Tests of a holistic chunking model of sentence memory through analyses of noun intrusions , 1978, Memory & cognition.

[5]  S J Thios,et al.  Memory for general and specific sentences , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[6]  P Wright,et al.  Transformations and the Understanding of Sentences , 1969, Language and speech.

[7]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Semantics and comprehension , 1976 .

[8]  Gregory V. Jones.  A fragmentation hypothesis of memory: Cued recall of pictures and of sequential position. , 1976 .

[9]  Gregory V. Jones.  Tests of a structural theory of the memory trace , 1978 .

[10]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  On putting apples into bottles — A problem of polysemy , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  P. Tannenbaum,et al.  Generation of active and passive sentences as a function of subject or object focus , 1968 .

[12]  Donald E. Broadbent,et al.  Decision and stress , 1971 .

[13]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[14]  A. Wearing.  Remembering Complex Sentences , 1972 .

[15]  Robert A. Boakes,et al.  Prompted recall of sentences , 1967 .

[16]  M. Halliday.  NOTES ON TRANSITIVITY AND THEME IN ENGLISH. PART 2 , 1967 .

[17]  Allan Paivio,et al.  Integrative processing of concrete and abstract sentences , 1977 .

[18]  Donald Broadbent,et al.  In defence of empirical psychology , 1973 .

[19]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Thematization and sentence retrieval , 1974 .

[20]  P H Tannenbaum,et al.  Prompted Word Replacement in Active and Passive Sentences , 1968, Language and speech.

[21]  L. A. Marascuilo,et al.  Nonparametric and Distribution-Free Methods for the Social Sciences , 1977 .

[22]  Richard C. Anderson.  Substance Recall of Sentences , 1974 .

[23]  D. Legge,et al.  Estimates of concreteness and other indices for 200 transitive verbs. , 1976 .

[24]  Arthur L. Blumenthal,et al.  Promoted recall of sentences. , 1967 .

[25]  M. Gregory,et al.  Aspects of varieties differentiation , 1967, Journal of Linguistics.

[26]  G. Bower,et al.  Human Associative Memory , 1973 .

[27]  V. Raeburn.  The role of the verb in sentence memory , 1979 .