Reality-check and renewed challenges in earthquake engineering: Implementing low-damage structural systems - from theory to practice

SUMMARY: Earthquake Engineering is facing an extraordinarily challenging era, the ultimate target being set at increasingly higher levels by the demanding expectations of our modern society. The renewed challenge is to be able to provide low-cost, thus more widely affordable, high-seismic-performance structures capable of sustaining a design level earthquake with limited or negligible damage, minimum disruption of business (downtime) or, in more general terms, controllable socio-economical losses. The Canterbury earthquakes sequence in 2010-2011 has represented a tough reality check, confirming the current mismatch between societal expectations over the reality of seismic performance of modern buildings. In general, albeit with some unfortunate exceptions, modern multi-storey buildings performed as expected from a technical point of view, in particular when considering the intensity of the shaking (higher than new code design) they were subjected to. As per capacity design principles, plastic hinges formed in discrete regions, allowing the buildings to sway and stand and people to evacuate. Nevertheless, in many cases, these buildings were deemed too expensive to be repaired and were consequently demolished. Targeting life-safety is arguably not enough for our modern society, at least when dealing with new building construction. A paradigm shift towards damage-control design philosophy and technologies is urgently required. This paper and the associated presentation will discuss motivations, issues and, more importantly, cost-effective engineering solutions to design buildings capable of sustaining low-level of damage and thus limited business interruption after a design level earthquake. Focus will be given to the extensive research and developments in jointed ductile connections based upon controlled rocking & dissipating mechanisms for either reinforced concrete and, more recently, laminated timber structures. An overview of recent on-site applications of such systems, featuring some of the latest technical solutions developed in the laboratory and including proposals for the rebuild of Christchurch, will be provided as successful examples of practical implementation of performance-based seismic design theory and technology.

[1]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS FROM BIAXIAL TESTING OF A TWO-STOREY, TWO-BY-ONE BAY, REINFORCED CONCRETE SLOTTED BEAM SUPERASSEMBLY , 2012 .

[2]  Sri Sritharan,et al.  Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESSS five-story precast concrete test Building , 1999 .

[3]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  NMIT Arts & Media Building - Damage Mitigation Using Post-tensioned Timber Walls , 2011 .

[4]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  FOCUSING ON REDUCING THE EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE TO FACADE SYSTEMS , 2011 .

[5]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  Development of a Non-tearing Floor Solution for Jointed Precast Frame Systems , 2007 .

[6]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  Quasi‐static and pseudo‐dynamic testing of unbonded post‐tensioned rocking bridge piers with external replaceable dissipaters , 2009 .

[7]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  Emerging Solutions for High Seismic Performance of Precast/Prestressed Concrete Buildings , 2005 .

[8]  E. Au,et al.  The Mechanics and Design of a Non-tearing Floor Connection using Slotted Reinforced Concrete Beams , 2010 .

[9]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  Seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings in the September 2010 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake , 2010 .

[10]  Mervyn J. Kowalsky,et al.  Displacement-based seismic design of structures , 2007 .

[11]  STEFANO PAMPANIN,et al.  PERFORMANCE-BASED SEISMIC RESPONSE OF FRAME STRUCTURES INCLUDING RESIDUAL DEFORMATIONS. PART II: MULTI-DEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEMS , 2003 .

[12]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  Damage Mitigation Strategies of ‘Non-Structural’ Infill Walls: Concept and Numerical-Experimental Validation Program , 2011 .

[13]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  Code provisions for seismic design of multi-storey post-tensioned timber buildings , 2006 .

[14]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  Improved seismic performance of LVL post-tensioned walls coupled with UFP devices , 2007 .

[15]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS ON HIGH-PERFORMANCE JOINTED DUCTILE CONNECTIONS FOR PRECAST FRAMES , 2006 .

[16]  E. Miranda,et al.  Residual displacement ratios for assessment of existing structures , 2006 .

[17]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  Self‐centering structural systems with combination of hysteretic and viscous energy dissipations , 2010 .

[18]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  EFFICIENCY OF SIMPLIFIED ALTERNATIVE MODELLING APPROACHES TO PREDICT THE SEISMIC RESPONSE OF PRECAST CONCRETE HYBRID SYSTEMS , 2005 .

[19]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  Seismic design of multi-storey buildings using Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL) , 2005 .

[20]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  The Demountability, Relocation and Re-use of a High Performance Timber Building , 2011 .

[21]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  Considerations on the seismic performance of pre-1970s RC buildings in the Christchurch CBD during the 4th Sept 2010 Canterbury earthquake: was that really a big one? , 2011 .

[22]  José I. Restrepo-Posada Seismic behaviour of connections between precast concrete elements , 1992 .

[23]  R. C. Fenwick,et al.  Elongation and load deflection characteristics of reinforced concrete members containing plastic hinges , 1993 .

[24]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  EXPECTATION MEETS REALITY: SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF POST- TENSIONED PRECAST CONCRETE SOUTHERN CROSS ENDOSCOPY BUILDING DURING THE 22 ND FEB 2011 CHRISTCHURCH EARTHQUAKE , 2011 .

[25]  Weng Yuen KAM,et al.  Advanced flag-shaped systems for high seismic performance , 2006 .

[26]  Robert Park,et al.  Seismic design and construction of precast concrete buildings in New Zealand , 2002 .

[27]  Jeffrey Matthews,et al.  Hollow-core floor slab performance following a severe earthquake , 2004 .

[28]  John F. Stanton,et al.  A HYBRID REINFORCED PRECAST FRAME FOR SEISMIC REGIONS , 1997 .

[29]  Stefano Pampanin Damage-Control Self-Centering Structures: From Laboratory Testing to On-site Applications , 2010 .

[30]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  Dynamic Testing of Precast, Post-Tensioned Rocking Wall Systems with Alternative Dissipating Solutions , 2008 .

[31]  M. J. N. Priestley,et al.  The PRESSS program : Current status and proposed plans for phase III , 1996 .

[32]  T. Paulay,et al.  Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings , 1992 .