Opposing Wind Energy Landscapes: A Search for Common Cause

Although wind power is local, sustainable, affordable, and carbon free, mounting public opposition to the landscape changes it produces threatens its expansion. In an era when many countries are looking to renewable energy as an answer to questions about national security and the risks of climate change, it is important to explain the sources of this reaction. This article looks for similarities in public resistance to wind developments in four diverse settings: Palm Springs, California; Cape Cod, Massachusetts; the Isle of Lewis, Scotland; and Oaxaca State, Mexico. Despite the natural and cultural diversity among these places, there are five common threads in the opposition that has been experienced: immobility, the site specificity of the resource; immutability, an expectation of landscape permanence; solidarity, the close relationship between people and the land; imposition, a sense of marginalization; and place identity, a loss of security. Considering more deeply the relationship between land and life, in advance of the development of renewable energy resources, will help smooth the otherwise bumpy road toward a more sustainable future.

[1]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study , 2010 .

[2]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Visible technologies, invisible organisations: An empirical study of public beliefs about electricity supply networks , 2010 .

[3]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Trust and community: Exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy , 2010 .

[4]  Peter Cappers,et al.  The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values in the United States: A Multi-Site Hedonic Analysis , 2010 .

[5]  M. Slattery,et al.  Public attitudes of wind energy in Texas: Local communities in close proximity to wind farms and their effect on decision-making , 2010 .

[6]  Kira Gee,et al.  Offshore wind power development as affected by seascape values on the German North Sea coast , 2010 .

[7]  Charles R. Warren,et al.  Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland , 2010 .

[8]  Mhairi Aitken,et al.  Why we still don't understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literature , 2010 .

[9]  Dan van der Horst,et al.  Exploring the landscape of wind farm developments; local area characteristics and planning process outcomes in rural England , 2010 .

[10]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Near-shore Wind Power - Protected Seascapes, Environmentalists' Attitudes, and the Technocratic Planning Perspective , 2010 .

[11]  R. Phadke,et al.  Steel forests or smoke stacks: the politics of visualisation in the Cape Wind controversy , 2010 .

[12]  Jeremy Firestone,et al.  The Effect of Wind Power Installations on Coastal Tourism , 2010 .

[13]  J. Meyerhoff,et al.  Landscape externalities from onshore wind power , 2010 .

[14]  K. Brown,et al.  Wind Energy on the Isle of Lewis: Implications for Deliberative Planning , 2009 .

[15]  Mark J. Kaiser,et al.  A comparison of offshore wind power development in europe and the U.S.: Patterns and drivers of development , 2009 .

[16]  Janet Stephenson,et al.  Public perceptions of wind energy developments: Case studies from New Zealand , 2009 .

[17]  Jeremy Firestone,et al.  Public acceptance of offshore wind power projects in the USA , 2009 .

[18]  Walter J.V. Vermeulen,et al.  The relative importance of social and institutional conditions in the planning of wind power projects , 2009 .

[19]  C. Lant,et al.  Welcoming the Wind? Determinants of Wind Power Development Among U.S. States , 2009 .

[20]  Víctor-Andrés Cloquell-Ballester,et al.  Development and validation of a multicriteria indicator for the assessment of objective aesthetic impact of wind farms , 2009 .

[21]  Jeremy Firestone,et al.  Wind Power, Wildlife, and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act: A Way Forward , 2008 .

[22]  Loretta O’Connor,et al.  The land remembers: landscape terms and place names in Lowland Chontal of Oaxaca, Mexico , 2008 .

[23]  Gareth Harrison,et al.  Change in public attitudes towards a Cornish wind farm: Implications for planning , 2008 .

[24]  W. Vermeulen,et al.  Social barriers in wind power implementation in The Netherlands: Perceptions of wind power entrepreneurs and local civil servants of institutional and social conditions in realizing wind power projects , 2007 .

[25]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’ , 2007 .

[26]  M. Dale Strickland,et al.  Ecological Impacts of Wind Energy Development on Bats: Questions, Research Needs, and Hypotheses , 2007 .

[27]  G. Ellis,et al.  Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’: Applying Q-Methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals , 2007 .

[28]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Planning of renewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation , 2007 .

[29]  Dominic Moran,et al.  An economic assessment of windfarm power generation in Scotland including externalities , 2007 .

[30]  W. Williams,et al.  Cape Wind: Money, Celebrity, Class, Politics, and the Battle for Our Energy Future on Nantucket Sound , 2007 .

[31]  D. Horst.  NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies , 2007 .

[32]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .

[33]  W. Kempton,et al.  Public opinion about large offshore wind power: Underlying factors , 2007 .

[34]  Miguel Ferrer,et al.  Birds and wind farms: risk assessment and mitigation , 2007 .

[35]  Erik Lundtang Petersen,et al.  Environmental impacts of wind-energy projects , 2007 .

[36]  Bernd Möller,et al.  Changing wind-power landscapes: regional assessment of visual impact on land use and population in Northern Jutland, Denmark , 2006 .

[37]  Charles R. Warren,et al.  ‘Green On Green’: Public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland , 2005 .

[38]  Kristina Ek.  Public and private attitudes towards “green” electricity: the case of Swedish wind power , 2005 .

[39]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy , 2005 .

[40]  Jeremy Firestone,et al.  The Offshore Wind Power Debate: Views from Cape Cod , 2005 .

[41]  P. Devine‐Wright.  Local aspects of UK renewable energy development: exploring public beliefs and policy implications , 2005 .

[42]  M. Dale Strickland,et al.  Bat activity, composition, and collision mortality at a large wind plant in Minnesota , 2004 .

[43]  Yuriko Saito.  Machines in the Ocean: The Aesthetics of Wind Farms , 2004 .

[44]  Richard C. Dorf,et al.  Wind Power in View: Energy Landscapes in a Crowded World , 2002 .

[45]  W. Mitchell.  Landscape and power , 2002 .

[46]  Martin J. Pasqualetti,et al.  Wind Energy Landscapes: Society and Technology in the California Desert , 2001 .

[47]  Emily Hinshelwood,et al.  Power to the People: community‐led wind energy – obstacles and opportunities in a South Wales Valley , 2001 .

[48]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support , 2000 .

[49]  Martin J. Pasqualetti,et al.  Morality, Space, and the Power of Wind‐Energy Landscapes , 2000 .

[50]  Adam Rome,et al.  A Sense of Place, a Sense of Time by John Brinckerhoff Jackson (review) , 1997, Technology and Culture.

[51]  Martin J. Pasqualetti,et al.  Public reaction to wind development in California , 1987 .

[52]  Leo Marx,et al.  The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Ideal in America by Leo Marx (review) , 1965 .