The ethics of nuclear power: Social experiments, intergenerational justice, and emotions

In this paper we argue that traditional approaches to risk assessment should be supplemented by an explicit discussion of the moral acceptability of nuclear technology and the risks it poses. The introduction of nuclear energy in society should be seen as an ongoing social experiment, whose (moral) acceptability should continuously be addressed. Given the long-term risks of nuclear energy, intergenerational justice should be explicitly included in such an analysis. This will also have implications for nuclear power policies. Furthermore, emotions such as sympathy and feelings of responsibility can provide moral insights; they should be taken seriously in the debate about nuclear energy rather than being dismissed as irrational distractions as is currently the case. These proposed reforms would help society to move beyond the usual stalemate in the debate about nuclear power.

[1]  K. Shrader-Frechette Environmental Justice: Creating Equality, Reclaiming Democracy , 2002 .

[2]  Weston M. Stacey,et al.  Nuclear Power Reactors , 2007 .

[3]  David J Ball,et al.  The Feeling of Risk: New Perspectives on Risk Perception , 2010 .

[4]  Paul Slovic,et al.  “If I look at the mass I will never act”: Psychic numbing and genocide , 2007, Judgment and Decision Making.

[5]  Sabine Roeser,et al.  Moral Emotions and Intuitions , 2010 .

[6]  P. Nidditch,et al.  Enquiries: Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals , 1966 .

[7]  Principia Ethica , 1922, Nature.

[8]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  Philosophical Perspectives on Risk , 2004 .

[9]  T. Brickhouse The Fabric of Character: Aristotle’s Theory of Virtue , 1990 .

[10]  Sabine Roeser,et al.  Risk Communication, Public Engagement, and Climate Change: A Role for Emotions , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  C. D. Bowman,et al.  Accelerator-driven Systems (ADS) and Fast Reactors (FR) in Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycles: A Comparative Study , 2002 .

[12]  J. Brady,et al.  The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. , 2014, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[13]  F. Hippel Managing Spent Fuel in the United States: The Illogic of Reprocessing , 2007 .

[14]  Robert C. Solomon,et al.  The Passions: Emotions and the Meaning of Life , 1976 .

[15]  B. Kushner Descartes' error. , 1998, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[16]  M. W. Popejoy Book Review: What will work: Fighting Climate Change with Renewable Energy, Not Nuclear Power , 2012 .

[17]  Behnam Taebi,et al.  Intergenerational Risks of Nuclear Energy , 2012 .

[18]  Behnam Taebi,et al.  To Recycle or Not to Recycle? An Intergenerational Approach to Nuclear Fuel Cycles , 2007, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[19]  Charles W. Forsberg,et al.  Sustainability by combining nuclear, fossil, and renewable energy sources , 2009 .

[20]  K. Shrader-Frechette,et al.  Duties to Future Generations, Proxy Consent, Intra‐ and Intergenerational Equity: The Case of Nuclear Waste , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[21]  Dan M. Kahan,et al.  Cultural Cognition as a Conception of the Cultural Theory of Risk , 2008 .

[22]  Annette Rid,et al.  Handbook of Risk Theory: Epistemology, Decision Theory, Ethics and Social Implications of Risk , 2012 .

[23]  Mohammad Modarres,et al.  A historical overview of probabilistic risk assessment development and its use in the nuclear power industry: a tribute to the late Professor Norman Carl Rasmussen , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[24]  Ibo van de Poel,et al.  Nuclear Energy as a Social Experiment , 2011 .

[25]  General principles for the radiation protection of workers , 1997, Annals of the ICRP.

[26]  Behnam Taebi,et al.  The Morally Desirable Option for Nuclear Power Production , 2011 .

[27]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  Setting the Limit: Occupational Health Standards and the Limits of Science , 1998 .

[28]  P. Slovic Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[29]  Stephen M. Gardiner The Pure Intergenerational Problem , 2003 .

[30]  P. Schuck TWO CONCEPTIONS OF EMOTION IN RISK REGULATION , 2009 .

[31]  W. Wasike,et al.  Cost-benefit analysis and the environment , 1995 .

[32]  Brian Barry,et al.  Sustainability and Intergenerational Justice , 1997 .

[33]  Sabine Roeser,et al.  Nuclear Energy, Risk, and Emotions , 2011 .

[34]  D Okrent,et al.  On Intergenerational Equity and Its Clash with Intragenerational Equity and on the Need for Policies to Guide the Regulation of Disposal of Wastes and Other Activities Posing Very Long-Term Risks , 1999, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[35]  Aristotle,et al.  THE NICOMACHEAN ETHICS , 1990 .

[36]  Rafaela Hillerbrand,et al.  Handbook of risk theory : epistemology, decision theory, ethics, and social implications of risk , 2012 .

[37]  Niklas Möller The Concepts of Risk and Safety , 2012 .

[38]  S. Krimsky,et al.  Social Theories of Risk , 1992 .

[39]  Kristin Shrader-Frechette,et al.  Burying Uncertainty: Risk and the Case Against Geological Disposal of Nuclear Waste , 1993 .

[40]  J. Stainer,et al.  The Emotions , 1922, Nature.

[41]  Sabine Roeser Risk Communication, Moral Emotions and Climate Change. , 2012 .

[42]  Sabine Roeser,et al.  The Ethics of Technological Risk , 2009 .

[43]  David Hume A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects , 1972 .