A MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF THE CHEMOSTAT WITH A GENERAL CLASS OF FUNCTIONS DESCRIBING NUTRIENT UPTAKE

A model of the chemostat involving n microorganisms competing for a single essential, growth-limiting substrate is considered. Instead of assuming the familiar Michaelis-Menten kinetics for nutrient uptake, a general class of functions is used which includes all monotone increasing uptake functions, but which also allows uptake functions that describe inhibition by the substrate at high concentrations.The qualitative behaviour of this generalized model is determined analytically. It is shown that the behaviour depends intimately upon certain parameters. Provided that all the parameters are distinct (which is a biologically reaonable assumption), at most one competitor survives. The substrate and the surviving competitor (if one exists), approach limiting values. Thus there is competitive exclusion. However, unlike the standard model, in certain cases the outcome is initial condition dependent.

[1]  Arthur E. Humphrey,et al.  Dynamics of a chemostat in which two organisms compete for a common substrate , 1977 .

[2]  R. McGehee,et al.  Some mathematical problems concerning the ecological principle of competitive exclusion , 1977 .

[3]  C. Conley Isolated Invariant Sets and the Morse Index , 1978 .

[4]  A periodic attractor determined by one function , 1978 .

[5]  A. Humphrey,et al.  Dynamic and steady state studies of phenol biodegradation in pure and mixed cultures , 1975, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  A. Fredrickson Interactions of Microbial Populations in Mixed Culture Situations , 1983 .

[7]  V. Volterra Variations and Fluctuations of the Number of Individuals in Animal Species living together , 1928 .

[8]  E. Powell Criteria for the growth of contaminants and mutants in continuous culture. , 1958, Journal of general microbiology.

[9]  Paul Waltman,et al.  Bifurcation from a limit cycle in a two predator-one prey ecosystem modeled on a chemostat , 1981 .

[10]  James P. Keener Oscillatory Coexistence in the Chemostat: A Codimension Two Unfolding , 1983 .

[11]  Sze-Bi Hsu,et al.  A Mathematical Theory for Single-Nutrient Competition in Continuous Cultures of Micro-Organisms , 1977 .

[12]  A. Bush,et al.  The effect of time delay and growth rate inhibition in the bacterial treatment of wastewater. , 1976, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  Sze-Bi Hsu,et al.  Limiting Behavior for Competing Species , 1978 .

[14]  P. Taylor,et al.  Theoretical studies on the coexistence of competing species under continuous-flow conditions. , 1975, Canadian journal of microbiology.

[15]  D. Herbert,et al.  The continuous culture of bacteria; a theoretical and experimental study. , 1956, Journal of general microbiology.

[16]  Hal L. Smith The Interaction of Steady State and Hopf Bifurcations in a Two-Predator–One-Prey Competition Model , 1982 .

[17]  A. Novick,et al.  Description of the chemostat. , 1950, Science.

[18]  J. Monod,et al.  Recherches sur la croissance des cultures bactériennes , 1942 .

[19]  P. Hartman Ordinary Differential Equations , 1965 .

[20]  H. I. Freedman,et al.  Persistence in models of three interacting predator-prey populations , 1984 .

[21]  Competitive Predator-Prey Systems and Coexistence , 1983 .

[22]  H LAUDELOUT,et al.  KINETICS OF THE NITRITE OXIDATION BY NITROBACTER WINOGRADSKYI , 1960, Journal of bacteriology.

[23]  H. M. Tsuchiya,et al.  Interactions of Tetrahymena pyriformis, Escherichia coli, Azotobacter vinelandii, and Glucose in a Minimal Medium , 1973 .

[24]  On a nonlinear Volterra equation , 1972 .