Classification effects of real and imaginary movement selective attention tasks on a P300-based brain–computer interface
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Elena L. Glassman,et al. A wavelet-like filter based on neuron action potentials for analysis of human scalp electroencephalographs , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[2] B. Burle,et al. Electroencephalographic nogo potentials in a no-movement context: the case of motor imagery in humans , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.
[3] David G. Stork,et al. Pattern Classification , 1973 .
[4] N. Kanwisher. Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation , 1987, Cognition.
[5] Isabelle Guyon,et al. An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[6] E Gordon,et al. Is the target-to-target interval a critical determinant of P3 amplitude? , 1999, Psychophysiology.
[7] P Sandroni,et al. Readiness to respond in a target detection task: pre- and post-stimulus event-related potentials in normal subjects. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[8] D L Woods,et al. The recovery functions of auditory event-related potentials during split-second discriminations. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[9] J. Polich. Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[10] E. Donchin,et al. Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[11] J. Polich,et al. P300 amplitude is determined by target-to-target interval. , 2002, Psychophysiology.
[12] J. Polich,et al. P300, probability, and interstimulus interval. , 1990, Psychophysiology.
[13] J. Polich. Clinical application of the P300 event-related brain potential. , 2004, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.
[14] Christa Neuper,et al. A scanning protocol for a sensorimotor rhythm-based brain–computer interface , 2009, Biological Psychology.
[15] G. Pfurtscheller,et al. The BCI competition III: validating alternative approaches to actual BCI problems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.
[16] Klaus-Robert Müller,et al. The BCI competition 2003: progress and perspectives in detection and discrimination of EEG single trials , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[17] G. Pfurtscheller,et al. Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.
[18] D.J. McFarland,et al. The wadsworth BCI research and development program: at home with BCI , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.
[19] R. Barry,et al. Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: The P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[20] J. Polich,et al. P300 from auditory and somatosensory stimuli: probability and inter-stimulus interval. , 1991, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.
[21] J. Ford,et al. ERPs to response production and inhibition. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[22] Luca Citi,et al. Possible sources of perceptual errors in P300-based speller paradigm , 2004 .
[23] Dean J Krusienski,et al. A comparison of classification techniques for the P300 Speller , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.
[24] K L Shapiro,et al. Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[25] M Congedo,et al. A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.
[26] R. McCarley,et al. Button-pressing affects P300 amplitude and scalp topography , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[27] C. Gonsalvez,et al. Target-to-target interval, intensity, and P300 from an auditory single-stimulus task. , 2007, Psychophysiology.
[28] Rabab K Ward,et al. A survey of signal processing algorithms in brain–computer interfaces based on electrical brain signals , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.
[29] A. A. Wijers,et al. Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[30] E Donchin,et al. Sequential expectancies and decision making in a changing environment: an electrophysiological approach. , 1982, Psychophysiology.
[31] E. Donchin,et al. On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. , 1977, Psychophysiology.
[32] C. Cinel,et al. P300-Based BCI Mouse With Genetically-Optimized Analogue Control , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.
[33] John Polich,et al. Response mode and P300 from auditory stimuli , 1987, Biological Psychology.
[34] R. McCarley,et al. The NoGo P300 ‘anteriorization’ effect and response inhibition , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[35] H. Shibasaki,et al. Human auditory and somatosensory event-related potentials: effects of response condition and age. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[36] E. Donchin,et al. P300 and tracking difficulty: evidence for multiple resources in dual-task performance. , 1980, Psychophysiology.
[37] E. Donchin,et al. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[38] Koji Inui,et al. Effects of a go/nogo task on event-related potentials following somatosensory stimulation , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.