Environmentally responsible freight transport service providers' assessment under data-driven information uncertainty

PurposeFreight transportation practices accounted for a significant share of environmental degradation and climate change over the years. Therefore, environmentally responsible transport practices (ERTPs) become a serious concern of freight shippers and transport service providers. Past studies generally ignored the assessment of ERTPs of freight transport companies during a transport service contract. To bridge the above literature gap, this paper proposed a hierarchical framework for evaluating freight transport companies based on ERTPs.Design/methodology/approachIn a data-driven decision-making environment, transport firm selection is affected by multiple expert inputs, lack of information availability, decision-making ambiguity and background of experts. The evaluation of such decisions requires a multi-criteria decision-making method under a group decision-making approach. This paper used a data-driven method based on the intuitionistic fuzzy-set-based analytic hierarchy process (IF-AHP) and VIseKriterijumska Kompromisno Rangiranje (IF-VIKOR) method. The applicability of the proposed framework is validated with the Indian freight transport industry.FindingsThe result analysis shows that environmental knowledge sharing among freight transport actors, quality of organizations human resource, collaborative green awareness training programs, promoting environmental awareness program for employees and compliance of government transport emission law and practice have been ranked top five ERTPs which significantly contribute to the environmental sustainability of freight transport industry. The proposed framework also ranked freight transport companies based on ERTPs.Research limitations/implicationsThis research is expected to provide a reference to develop ERTPs in the emerging economies freight transport industry and contribute to the development of a sustainable freight transport system.Originality/valueThis study assesses the environmental responsibility of the freight transportation industry. The emerging economies logistics planners can use proposed framework for assessing the performance of freight transportation companies based on ERTPs.

[1]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Environmental sustainability and production: taking the road less travelled , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[2]  R. Chavez,et al.  Data-driven supply chain capabilities and performance: A resource-based view , 2017, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.

[3]  Chieh-Yu Lin,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON LOGISTICS SERVICE PROVIDERS' INTENTION TO ADOPT GREEN INNOVATIONS , 2008 .

[4]  Pei-Ju Wu,et al.  The data-driven analytics for investigating cargo loss in logistics systems , 2017 .

[5]  S.W.F. Omta,et al.  Dutch Logistics Service Providers and Sustainable Physical Distribution: Searching for Focus , 2012 .

[6]  M. Björklund,et al.  Matches and gaps in the green logistics market , 2012 .

[7]  Catrin Lammgård Intermodal train services: A business challenge and a measure for decarbonisation for logistics service providers , 2012 .

[8]  Seong-Tae Kim,et al.  Measuring Environmental Logistics Practices , 2011 .

[9]  Aalok Kumar,et al.  Evaluating the interrelationships among inhibitors to intermodal railroad freight transport in emerging economies: A multi-stakeholder perspective , 2020 .

[10]  Dan Andersson,et al.  Environmental considerations and trade-offs in purchasing of transportation services , 2014 .

[11]  R. Lieb,et al.  Environmental sustainability in the third‐party logistics (3PL) industry , 2010 .

[12]  Aalok Kumar,et al.  Location selection of multimodal freight terminal under STEEP sustainability , 2019 .

[13]  Aalok Kumar,et al.  Assessment of environmental and social sustainability performance of the freight transportation industry: An index-based approach , 2020 .

[14]  Anantha Lakshmi Paladugula,et al.  A multi-model assessment of energy and emissions for India's transportation sector through 2050 , 2018 .

[15]  Inger Beate Hovi,et al.  Energy efficiency of road freight hauliers—A Nordic comparison , 2014 .

[16]  Aalok Kumar,et al.  Development of social sustainability index for freight transportation system , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[17]  Yağmur Karabulut,et al.  A new group decision making approach with IF AHP and IF VIKOR for selecting hazardous waste carriers , 2019, Measurement.

[18]  Casper Boks,et al.  Increasing the benefits of product‐level benchmarking for strategic eco‐efficient decision making , 2007 .

[19]  Mohammad Yazdi,et al.  Risk assessment based on novel intuitionistic fuzzy-hybrid-modified TOPSIS approach , 2018, Safety Science.

[20]  M Bracale,et al.  Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Examining Healthcare Professionals’ Assessments of Risk Factors , 2010, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[21]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A new integrated intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making approach for product development partner selection , 2016, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[22]  P. Evangelista Environmental sustainability practices in the transport and logistics service industry: An exploratory case study investigation , 2014 .

[23]  Z. X. Guo,et al.  Performance measurement system and strategies for developing low-carbon logistics: A case study in China , 2017 .

[24]  J. Lam,et al.  Environmental sustainability of logistics service provider: an ANP-QFD approach , 2015 .

[25]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Big data: the management revolution. , 2012, Harvard business review.

[26]  Gyöngyi Kovács,et al.  Reducing transportation emissions : A reaction to stakeholder pressure or a strategy to increase competitive advantage , 2014 .

[27]  Stephan Vachon,et al.  Green supply chain practices and the selection of environmental technologies , 2007 .

[28]  L. Ellram,et al.  The role of legitimacy in pursuing environmentally responsible transportation practices , 2016 .

[29]  Antonio Espuña Camarasa,et al.  A meta-multiparametric framework: Application to the operation of bio-based energy supply chains , 2015 .

[30]  R. Thompson,et al.  Analyzing the Promoting Factors for Adopting Green Logistics Practices: A Case Study of Road Freight Industry in Nanjing, China , 2014 .

[31]  Jacques Leonardi,et al.  CO2 efficiency in road freight transportation: Status quo, measures and potential , 2004 .

[32]  Francesc Peters,et al.  Effects of small-scale turbulence on lower trophic levels under different nutrient conditions , 2010 .

[33]  S. Perotti,et al.  Building environmental sustainability: empirical evidence from Logistics Service Providers , 2013 .

[34]  Rakesh D. Raut,et al.  Linking big data analytics and operational sustainability practices for sustainable business management , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[35]  Muhd Zaimi Abd Majid,et al.  A global review of energy consumption, CO2 emissions and policy in the residential sector (with an overview of the top ten CO2 emitting countries) , 2015 .

[36]  Suhaiza Hanim Binti Dato Mohamad Zailani,et al.  Green Innovation Adoption among Logistics Service Providers in Malaysia: An Exploratory Study on the Managers’ Perceptions , 2011 .

[37]  Peter Oberhofer,et al.  Environmental Management in the Transport and Logistics Sector: Findings from a Qualitative Study , 2013 .

[38]  Anjali Awasthi,et al.  Green supplier development program selection using NGT and VIKOR under fuzzy environment , 2016, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[39]  Mohsen Ahmadi,et al.  The impact of knowledge management practices on organizational performance: A balanced scorecard approach , 2015, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[40]  Sini Laari,et al.  Environmental sustainability in shipper-LSP relationships , 2018 .

[41]  Paulo Antônio Zawislak,et al.  Towards the Innovation Function , 2008 .

[42]  M. Helms,et al.  Performance measurement for green supply chain management , 2005 .

[43]  Alessandro Creazza,et al.  Is environmental sustainability a strategic priority for logistics service providers? , 2017, Journal of environmental management.

[44]  L. Ellram,et al.  Adopting Environmental Transportation Practices , 2015 .

[45]  K. Isaksson,et al.  Understanding efficiencies behind logistics service providers' green offerings , 2013 .

[46]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Multi-expert performance evaluation of healthcare institutions using an integrated intuitionistic fuzzy AHP&DEA methodology , 2017, Knowl. Based Syst..

[47]  Jingmin Wang,et al.  The Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets on Evaluation of Risks in Projects of Energy Management Contract , 2012 .

[48]  David Simchi-Levi,et al.  Identifying Risks and Mitigating Disruptions in the Automotive Supply Chain , 2015, Interfaces.

[49]  David L. Ferguson CSR in Asian logistics: operationalisation within DHL (Thailand) , 2011 .

[50]  Heikki Liimatainen,et al.  Energy efficiency practices among road freight hauliers , 2012 .

[51]  Hau L. Lee Don't tweak your supply chain: Rethink it end to end , 2010 .

[52]  Marco Guerci,et al.  Deploying Environmental Management Across Functions: The Relationship Between Green Human Resource Management and Green Supply Chain Management , 2018 .

[53]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[54]  Robert de Souza,et al.  Data-driven risk measurement of firm-to-firm relationships in a supply chain , 2016 .

[55]  M. Björklund,et al.  Logistics service providers and corporate social responsibility: sustainability reporting in the logistics industry , 2015 .

[56]  Chieh-Yu Lin,et al.  Determinants of Green Practice Adoption for Logistics Companies in China , 2011 .

[57]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[58]  Jacques Leonardi,et al.  Improving computerized routing and scheduling and vehicle telematics : A qualitative survey , 2008 .

[59]  G. Micheli,et al.  Green supply chain practices and company performance: the case of 3PLs in Italy , 2012 .

[60]  Fatih Emre Boran,et al.  The Evaluation of Renewable Energy Technologies for Electricity Generation in Turkey Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS , 2012 .

[61]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[62]  K. Atanassov More on intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 1989 .

[63]  M. Grazia Speranza,et al.  Trends in transportation and logistics , 2018, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[64]  Riccardo Manzini,et al.  A hierarchical data architecture for sustainable food supply chain management and planning , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[65]  Changiz Valmohammadi,et al.  Strategic collaboration and sustainable supply chain management , 2019, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[66]  Qiang Wei,et al.  Providing an effective group-buying aggregation service: a data-driven approach , 2014, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[67]  Benjamin T. Hazen,et al.  Data quality for data science, predictive analytics, and big data in supply chain management: An introduction to the problem and suggestions for research and applications , 2014 .

[68]  G. Zsidisin,et al.  Environmental purchasing: a framework for theory development , 2001 .

[69]  R. Chavez,et al.  Data-driven supply chains, manufacturing capability and customer satisfaction , 2017 .

[70]  Tsan-Ming Choi,et al.  Big Data Analytics in Operations Management , 2018 .

[71]  Yongmei Bentley,et al.  The role of collaboration in the UK green supply chains: an exploratory study of the perspectives of suppliers, logistics and retailers , 2014 .

[72]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A new combined IF-DEMATEL and IF-ANP approach for CRM partner evaluation , 2017 .

[73]  Vasco Augusto Sanchez Rodrigues,et al.  The longer and heavier vehicle debate: A review of empirical evidence from Germany , 2015 .

[74]  Alev Taskin Gumus,et al.  An extended fuzzy TOPSIS–GRA method based on different separation measures for green logistics service provider selection , 2016, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[75]  Kim Copenhaver Fake news and digital literacy: The academic library’s role in shaping digital citizenship , 2018, The Reference Librarian.

[76]  Allen H. Tai,et al.  Optimising truckload operations in third-party logistics: A carbon footprint perspective in volatile supply chain , 2018, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[77]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Prioritising indicators in improving supply chain performance using fuzzy AHP: insights from the case example of four Indian manufacturing companies , 2017 .

[78]  Emilio Esposito,et al.  Developing the WH2 framework for environmental sustainability in logistics service providers: A taxonomy of green initiatives , 2017 .

[79]  C. Carter,et al.  Environmental Purchasing: Benchmarking Our German Counterparts , 1998 .

[80]  K. Govindan,et al.  Critical success factors for reverse logistics in Indian industries: a structural model , 2016 .

[81]  Fredrik Nilsson,et al.  Developing environmentally sustainable logistics. Exploring themes and challenges from a logistics service providers' perspective , 2016 .

[82]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  An Integrated Intuitionistic Fuzzy AHP and SWOT Method for Outsourcing Reverse Logistics Highlights , 2015 .

[83]  G. Büyüközkan,et al.  Sustainability performance evaluation: Literature review and future directions. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.

[84]  Jalal Ashayeri,et al.  Supply chain partners and configuration selection: An intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral operator based approach , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[85]  Davide Aloini,et al.  Technology assessment with IF-TOPSIS: An application in the advanced underwater system sector , 2017, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[86]  Rudolf O. Large,et al.  Procurement of logistics services and sustainable development in Europe: Fields of activity and empirical results , 2013 .

[87]  J. Baz,et al.  Third-party logistics providers (TPLs) and environmental sustainability practices in developing countries: The case of Morocco , 2017 .

[88]  S. Pathumnakul,et al.  Green initiatives for logistics service providers: An investigation of antecedent factors and the contributions to corporate goals , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[89]  Qingqi Long,et al.  A framework for data-driven computational experiments of inter-organizational collaborations in supply chain networks , 2017, Inf. Sci..

[90]  F. Larsson,et al.  Modal shift for greener logistics – the shipper's perspective , 2012 .

[91]  Lazim Abdullah,et al.  A new preference scale of intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in multi-criteria decision making problems , 2014, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[92]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Multicriteria Planning of Post‐Earthquake Sustainable Reconstruction , 2002 .

[93]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Predicting changing pattern: building model for consumer decision making in digital market , 2018, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[94]  Ming-Lang Tseng,et al.  Data-driven sustainable supply chain management performance: A hierarchical structure assessment under uncertainties , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[95]  Andreas G. F. Hoepner,et al.  Does stakeholder pressure influence corporate GHG emissions reporting? Empirical evidence from Europe , 2015 .