Steps toward a shared governance response for achieving Good Environmental Status in the Mediterranean Sea

The Mediterranean region is of fundamental importance to Europe given its strategic position. The responsibility for its overall ecosystem integrity is shared by European Union Member States (EU-MS) and other Mediterranean countries. A juxtaposition of overlapping governance instruments occurred recently in the region, with the implementation of both the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) for EU-MS and the Ecosystem Approach Strategy (ECAP) for all Mediterranean countries, including EU-MS. Both MSFD and ECAP are structured around vision-driven processes to achieve Good Environmental Status and a Healthy Environment, respectively. These processes have clear ecosystem-based, integrated policy objectives to guarantee the preservation and integrity of Mediterranean marine ecosystem goods and services. However, adoption of these instruments, especially those related to the new EUMS directives on marine policy, could result in a governance gap in addition to the well-known economic gap between the EU and the non-EU political blocs. We identify two complementary requirements for effective implementation of both MSFD and ECAP that could work together to reduce this gap, to ensure a better alignment between MSFD and ECAP and better planning for stakeholder engagement. These are key issues for the future success of these instruments in a Mediterranean region where discrepancies between societal and ecological objectives may pose a challenge to these processes.

[1]  A. Rosenberg,et al.  Strengthening Institutions for Stakeholder Involvement and Ecosystem-Based Management in the US Arctic Offshore , 2022 .

[2]  P. Ramírez-Monsalve,et al.  On unequal footing: Stakeholder perspectives on the marine strategy framework directive as a mechanism of the ecosystem-based approach to marine management , 2012 .

[3]  C. Humborg,et al.  Nutrient budgets for European seas: a measure of the effectiveness of nutrient reduction policies. , 2008, Marine pollution bulletin.

[4]  Karen L. McLeod,et al.  The many faces of ecosystem-based management: Making the process work today in real places , 2010 .

[5]  S. Mazzola,et al.  The ICZM Balanced Scorecard: A tool for putting integrated coastal zone management into action , 2014 .

[6]  I. Goulding,et al.  Potential economic impacts of achieving good environmental status in Black Sea fisheries , 2014 .

[7]  Eva Roth,et al.  Temporal constraints on ecosystem management:Definitions and examples from Europe's regional seas , 2014 .

[8]  Mark F. Forst The convergence of Integrated Coastal Zone Management and the ecosystems approach , 2009 .

[9]  E. Roth,et al.  Integrating the Common Fisheries Policy and the Marine Strategy for the Baltic: Discussion of Spatial and Temporal Scales in the Management and Adaptation to Changing Climate , 2011 .

[10]  A. Barausse,et al.  Trophic network model of the Northern Adriatic Sea: analysis of an exploited and eutrophic ecosystem. , 2009 .

[11]  Gianpiero Cossarini,et al.  Recent Trends Towards Oligotrophication of the Northern Adriatic: Evidence from Chlorophyll a Time Series , 2010 .

[12]  A. Barausse,et al.  Long-term changes in community composition and life-history traits in a highly exploited basin (northern Adriatic Sea): the role of environment and anthropogenic pressures. , 2011, Journal of fish biology.

[13]  T. Luisetti,et al.  Valuing the European 'coastal blue carbon' storage benefit. , 2013, Marine pollution bulletin.

[14]  J. Albaigés,et al.  Integrated assessment of chemical pollution in the Mediterranean Sea: Driver-Pressures-State-Welfare analysis , 2013 .

[15]  D. Trump The Prehistory of the Mediterranean , 1980 .

[16]  S. Cheong A new direction in coastal management , 2008 .

[17]  U. Brandt,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Systems Science for Managing Europe's Seas Detecting critical choke points for achieving Good Environmental Status in European seas , 2015 .

[18]  R. Costanza,et al.  Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making , 2009 .

[19]  T. Potts,et al.  Oceans of opportunity or rough seas? What does the future hold for developments in European marine policy? , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  S. Cozzi,et al.  River water and nutrient discharges in the Northern Adriatic Sea: Current importance and long term changes , 2011 .

[21]  Jacob Carstensen,et al.  Marine management--towards an integrated implementation of the European Marine Strategy Framework and the Water Framework Directives. , 2010, Marine pollution bulletin.

[22]  Laurence Mee,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Systems Science for Managing Europe's Seas Achieving good environmental status in the Black Sea: scale mismatches in environmental management , 2014 .

[23]  G. Malorgio,et al.  Price formation and geographic market integration: An empirical investigation of Adriatic small pelagic species , 2012 .

[24]  J. V. Tatenhove,et al.  EU Marine policy on the move: The tension between fisheries and maritime policy , 2009 .