Design substantiation of ceramic materials on fusion reactor confinement boundaries

Ceramic components will be used for electrical insulation and optical transparency on the heating and diagnostic systems of fusion reactors. As these form the boundary for the radioactive confinement, a defined procedure is required to demonstrate structural integrity. The established design codes are incompatible with ceramic materials for various reasons, predominantly the brittle nature of ceramics. CCFE and others have started to develop an in-house design code for the use of brittle materials in pressure vessels, this paper discusses the rationale behind the rules. The difficulty of reconciling the statistical nature of failure in ceramics with the deterministic nature in codes is addressed and it is suggested that the only way to achieve this is by a proof testing approach. The inherent weakness of the proof testing methodology, quantifying the strength loss during the qualification test is discussed. Further work is required to determine the validity of the rules experimentally.

[1]  L. Broutman,et al.  Effects of Combined Stresses on Fracture of Alumina and Graphite , 1970 .

[2]  J. Petrovic,et al.  Multiaxial loading fracture of Al2O3 tubes. I: Experiments , 2006 .

[3]  G. P. Pells,et al.  The effects of γ-irradiation on subcritical crack growth in alumina , 1998 .

[4]  Theo Fett,et al.  Ceramics: Mechanical Properties, Failure Behaviour, Materials Selection , 1999 .

[5]  Joseph Edward Shigley,et al.  Mechanical engineering design , 1972 .

[6]  H. Awaji,et al.  Fracture criteria of reactor graphite under multiaxial stesses , 1987 .

[7]  D. Krause,et al.  Determination of the multiaxial failure criteria for alumina ceramics under tension–torsion test , 2010 .

[8]  R. Morrell,et al.  Design with non-ductile materials , 1982 .

[9]  Anthony G. Evans,et al.  Application of Fracture Mechanics to Space‐Shuttle Windows , 1974 .

[10]  V. Svalbonas,et al.  Rules for design of nuclear graphite core components — Some considerations and approaches☆ , 1978 .

[11]  M. Stapelbroek,et al.  Fusion/fission neutron damage ratio for alumina , 1979 .

[12]  P. Becher,et al.  Mechanical reliability of ceramic windows in high frequency microwave heating devices , 1984 .

[13]  George Sines,et al.  Determination of Biaxial Compressive Strength of a Sintered Alumina Ceramic , 1976 .

[14]  Anthony G. Evans,et al.  Fatigue in ceramics , 1980 .

[15]  Noel P. O’Dowd,et al.  Mixed-mode fracture toughness of ceramic materials , 1990 .

[16]  Subra Suresh,et al.  Combined Mode I‐Mode III Fracture of Fatigue‐Precracked Alumina , 1987 .

[17]  H. L. Heinisch,et al.  Weakest Link Theory Reformulated for Arbitrary Fracture Criterion , 1978 .

[18]  P. B. Oates,et al.  Proof testing of ceramics , 1980 .

[19]  A. G. Evans,et al.  Crack propagation in ceramic materials under cyclic loading conditions , 1974, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B.

[20]  P. Becher,et al.  Mechanical reliability of ceramic windows in high frequency microwave heating devices , 1984 .

[21]  Detlef Löhe,et al.  Influence of the temperature on the strength and the subcritical crack growth rate of alumina , 2004 .

[22]  Sheldon M. Wiederhorn,et al.  Proof testing of ceramics , 1980 .